are likely to influence that would you be open to experimentation on yourself why would you and jack gene fix and tear self and take a risk for the sake of science. yes i mean i am i have been a guinea pig in the research. studies ever since my mother father essentially did mature research on me. which was probably within the law. but i would want to participate in the study that is a randomized clinical trial something that that has some chance of producing reproducible and useful information not so something where it's a one off on controlled study if we're just doing it to myself so do i understand correctly that you're already been subject to experiments with and i've been a research subject. experiments opposed to a lot of kind of spearmint like we're already changing what happened for example was a little more formal ones started in college and involved as in psychological works berman's was involved in nutrition experiments and. one of the main research subjects in the personal genome projects of so very beginning of the study that i started so have your eyes become blue after that

and oranges but to follow on charlie, took curiosity on mars 3 1/2 years to cover the same that gene and jackid on apollo 17 in three days and brought back 245 pounds of rocks and material. so again it puts -- you need both but it costs more, too. >> next question? >> a short question, but likely a bit controversial. you talk about competition and collaboration and it seems to me one of the big elephants in space might be china. i'm interested in your response in addressing the relationship in terms of space and china. >> why does everybody look at me? i'm the guy that shot him, again. >> most recently -- >> say what you will about president obama and the obama administration, in 2010, we thought we were on the verge of having another apollo soyuz but a shinjo shuttle or whatever you call it and it got shut down by the congress, so you know, all of you recognize, because a lot of your intellectual and academic partners are chinese. everybody, we got problems with everybody. you know, what makes us able to work on the international space station so incredibly well, it's mission focused. it's d

to follow charlie, it took a curiosity of mars 3 1/2 years to cover the same distance that gene cernan and jackid on apollo in three day, and they brought back that pounds of rocks. unique and cost more for dcerna. >>> and so you talk about collaboration and it seems to me that one of the big elephants in space might be china, and so i am interested in your response in addressing the relationship in terms of space and china. >> why does everybody look at me? am the guy that shot him. again. say what you will about president obama, and the obama administration, and in 2010, we thought that we were on the verge of having another apollo soy soyuz, but it was a shinjo shuttle and shot down by the congress. so all of you recognize, because a lot of your intellectual and academic partners are chinese. we have problems with everybody. the ability to work with the cosmos on the international space station is so well, that it is mission-focused to make the world a better place. when i was commanded to command the last space shuttle, george abby said go back to houston and fly another shuttle mission. i