jack kent would agree with that. i don't know if he would agree with the use of tariffs, as much as president trump has. i was skeptical when i came in, but i think -- the argument is he is shaking things up. the world trading system is broken, barriers have gone up, the world trading organization is broken, china is the biggest defender -- china is the biggest offender. property rights, intellectual rights, forced transfers of technology, rising tariffs, rising non-tariff barriers, this is all wrong. , and i thinkulprit potus is exactly right to go after them. you can think about tactics, but i don't know where can't -- kent would come out. as a free trader, i should be opposed to all tariffs? i don't know about that/. i don't like link it -- blanket tariffs. i still oppose the steel and aluminum national security tariffs. but the battle against china is correct. the use of tariffs in that battle is controversial, but i favorite. -- i favor it. other presidents have gone after china and unfair trading practices, but

jack kent would agree with that. i don't know if he would agree with the use of tariffs as much as president trump has. i don't know. was somewhat skeptical when i came in, but i think the argument is he is shaking things up. the world trading system is broken. barriers have gone up. the world trading organization is broken. china is the biggest offender. china property rights, , intellectual rights, forced transfers of technology, rising tariffs, rising non-tariff barriers. this stuff is all wrong. the biggest culprit, not the only one, but the biggest one and i think potus is exactly , right to go after them. you can argue about tactics. i understand that. but i do not know where kent would come out. as a free trader, i should be opposed to all tariffs? i don't know about that. i don't like blanket tariffs. to this day, i continue to oppose the steel and aluminum national security tariffs. but the battle against china is correct. the use of tariffs in that battle is i guess controversial, but i favor it. other pres

twitter will be represented by jack dorsey, facebook by sheryl sand berg. google is offering kentrichard bur rejected but the company will still make him available. this comes after last november all three companies testified before congress about russian meddling in the election and drew criticism for not sending their top executives since then they've been investing heavily and cracking down on election interference, facebook and twitter and google found coordinated activity coming from iran just yaesterday announcing they are suspending 500 additional ks back over to you >> julia, the fact that google is making a senior vice president available when you see the ceo of at which time are and coo of facebook. is there anything to be read into that as far as how seriously they are taking this >> it seems there's certainly a back and forth right now between the committee and google we've reached out multiple times to google with that very question they got back to us just this morning and said we're still making them available indicating that they are sticking with their plan for no

to that point, sheryl , anderg, jack dorsey perhaps someone from google, we don't know yet, will be testifying before congress next week. google said they would send kent walker and congress has said that is not adequate enough. some other senators had said they want the ceo, but they're not going to subpoena him. emily: why not? mark: i don't know. ceo love theal stuff. he loves getting in front and was partly the ceo and chairman to be that sort of person. sooner is much more in the mold of the google founders. he loves to be a part of the company and being set -- and loves being at the developer conferences. it is not love addressing the public or being grilled by senators. emily: kate, is google making a mistake by sending -- not sending their top executive? kate: i think they are missing an incredible opportunity. part of it is that seriousness that facebook and twitter are now showing, is well-received in washington and well-received by the public. we are part of the audience as well. it is a missed opportunity. one of the challenges for the --pany is that data has big in one of their biggest assets. from the shareholder point of view, they need