jackie spierer would have a word or two for you.e go. >> the real interesting part of this is we have a powerful woman asserting her power and it's make something men very uncomfortable. trish: are you uncomfortable. >> i'm real uncomfortable. i grew up in jackie spierer's district. she was a dummy back then and she is still a dummy. my genitalia does not tell me way can and can't say. i am an american citizen and i will say whatever i want. trish: curt, good to see you. ' be. >> there was no evidence given to us of an imminent threat that justified this level of action. >> i don't believe they met the level definition of imminent threat. >> there in fact was not evidence of an imminent detailed attack against the united states. trish: why can't democrats and the media be happy that a man who obama said was a terrorist and responsible for the killing of hundreds of americans. why can't they be happy he's gone? kt mcfarland is here and she'll try to figure that out with me after this. president trump: the republican party is the part

jackie spierer would have a word or two for you.heer we go. >> the real interesting part of this is we have a powerful woman asserting her power and it's make something men very uncomfortable. trish: are you uncomfortable. >> i'm real uncomfortable. i grew up in jackie spierer's district. she was a dummy back then and she is still a dummy. my genitalia does not tell me way can and can't say. i am an american citizen and i will say whatever i want. trish: curt, good to see you. ' be. >> there was no evidence given to us of an imminent threat that justified this level of action. >> i don't believe they met the level definition of imminent threat. >> there in fact was not evidence of an imminent detailed attack against the united states. trish: why can't democrats and the media be happy that a man who obama said was a terrorist and responsible for the killing of hundreds of americans. why can't they be happy he's gone? kt mcfarland is here and she'll try to figure that out with me after this. president trump: the republican party is th

intelligence and evidence than presented to members of congress so far, and listen to congresswoman jackie spierers who is a democrat, and she has reviewed some intelligence and not the more thorough stuff that is presented today and she said that it is vague. take a listen. >> i think that this is going to go down in history as a epic foreign policy blunder by the president of the united states. i can't say that it was persuadable. it was vague. >> vague. schiff says that he is the chairman of the intelligence committee, and what he has seen so far and he going to be seeing more detailed stuff now, but there is a lack of detail in terms of the plotting and the imminence, and what do you make of it so far? >> that is the big question, why now? we know that soleimani is a bad guy and terrorist, and even though he is a government official in iran was, and somebody who was being tracked back from the bush administration, but the option of exercising an assassination now after what? what was the imminent precipitating event that leads to this level of escalation followed by then the nation's chief dipl