[applause] >> thank you, jacob. i would now like to introduce monica hernandez, deputy director for housing community development. >> thank you. hi everyone. i love to see all these smiling faces. on behalf of governor gavin newsome and the california department of housing and community development, it's my pleasure to congratulate all of you and be here in celebration. this is a momentous occasion. it's mott just historic. it is a testament to the city of san francisco. leaders across san francisco. tndc, the mayor's office, to it all of you and a testament to the love for this community. and, it's a testament to partnership. partnership with city and state and the california housing accelerator which jacob mentioned. i'm going to tell you a little bit about that. we have been facing four decades of housing crisis and we were looking at about $3 billion of backlog in permit and shovel ready projects just sitting there that would have left projects like 180 jones in limbo. gavin newsome responding to our urgent need

jacob reese mogg, it sounds— until september.n, isn't he? raising taxes to socialist — opposition, isn't he? raising taxes to socialist levels and his cabinet ministers — to socialist levels and his cabinet ministers accusing him of dirty tricks — ministers accusing him of dirty tricks and _ ministers accusing him of dirty tricks and trying to rig the leadership race and the times talk about— leadership race and the times talk about the — leadership race and the times talk about the leadership race descending into vitriol _ about the leadership race descending into vitriol and it's really worth remembering that they do at some point _ remembering that they do at some point have — remembering that they do at some point have to come back together and convince _ point have to come back together and convince the electorate in the next 24 months — convince the electorate in the next 24 months that they are united party and really— 24 months that they are united party and really tearing each other apart is not. _ and really tearing eac

let's hear jacob from alabama, jacob, tuscaloosa, independent line. caller: hello, sir. i was actually calling -- i know it will be a bit of divisive topic considering the house bill proposal that's coming in today. i'm actually wanting to discuss and inform some of your watchers, there's actually a lot of stuff that, for example, congress doesn't talk about when it comes to the second amendment and what's covered under it. like, for example, there's the 16th american juris prudence second edition, 777, or late second edition, 256. it says if it's in any way against the constitutional or its amendments, that it's not valid law. so things like the n.s.a., the g.c.a., firearms protection act, hughes amendment, not the act itself but the hughes amendment wouldn't be valid because under things like new york state rifle and pistol association v. bruin they're not valid due to the fact there's no analogue historically. host: that's jacob there in alabama. arrests in front of the supreme court yesterday. arrests involving many and several members of congress. alexandria ocasio-

both marc short and greg jacob are two key players. when they began their cooperation with the january 6 select committee, it opened the door to a whole line of pressure that was put on vice president mike pence during that period of time. it provided insight into the push to have pence stand in the way of the certification of the election results on january 6th. efforts to get him to accept a false slate of electors. there are so many different connections that pence's office has to the attempts to stand in the way of the election e being certified for joe biden. and the fact that jacob and marc short, who were both very cooperative with the committee and told them a lot about what they knew during that period of time, it also would indicate that they would show the same level of cooperation with the department of justice as well. so, this is absolutely significant. it shows just how serious the department of justice is taking things, as their investigation speeds up in a major way. >> do we know why congresswoman laurie released this

kriti: jacob, let's talk about the european side.ents before you joined the program i saw you post on twitter about the fiscal issues, specifically germany hitting its debt limit. connect the dots, not just cost-of-living in the u.k. but, should russian gas get turned off as soon as next week, the implications of how dire the situation is fiscally for all of your. >> there is no doubt that such economic warfare by vladimir putin would have significant short-term locations. you would have to have significant immediate reductions in demand meaning partial shutdowns of areas across europe. chemicals and others. you would have retail customers asked to literally turn off the hot water, take shorter showers and the like. this will hit all of europe. it will ricochet onto the u.k.. you have an offshore potential strike that may be resolved in norway. ultimately, this u.k. is in a different situation when it comes to energy induced inflation already. basically, the short answer is, things will get worse in europe intentionally as of next we

thatcherites, jacob rees—mogg andl thatcherites, jacob rees—mogg and people _ thatcherites, jacob rees—moggherites, jacob rees—mogg and people like that, as a _ thatcherites, jacob rees—mogg and people like that, as a socialist, - people like that, as a socialist, though— people like that, as a socialist, though he _ people like that, as a socialist, though he is— people like that, as a socialist, though he is actually— people like that, as a socialist, though he is actually being - people like that, as a socialist, though he is actually being the | though he is actually being the balance — though he is actually being the balance the _ though he is actually being the balance the books _ though he is actually being the balance the books don't - though he is actually being the balance the books don't put. though he is actually being the balance the books don't put up though he is actually being the - balance the books don't put up taxes until you _ balance the books don't put up taxes until you can— balance the books don't put up taxes until you can pay— balance the books don't put up taxes u

greg jacob, martin short testifying for the federal grand jury, how significant? >> it's a big deal, especially in the big picture. remember, main criticism of the justice department so far has been that they are unduly focused are even exclusively focused on the small fish. the people that are inside the capitol, you know who trespass commit acts of violence, and not focused at all on something and larger offenses, the people closest to trump. this shows that this -- at the white house. plus, are part of at least three of the most important areas of inquiry. once the pressure on mike pence to violate his oath and stop the certification of the election. the fake electors scheme and the effort to corrupt the justice department. they know about all of that, the fact that the justice department is now, has those people in the grand jury suggest that that's what they're investigating. >> this is no question, the justice department, do they need to re-interview before a grand jury everybody who testified before the january six committee, or the main players? will they

making the threat jacobs says making the threat normative, right?y, an atomic attack. you cannot show film of two children, right? it's too horrifying. so instead, using that medium of animation. they portray that bright light, right? the light is described as a bright flash, brighter than the sun. and then it transitions into the animation, where, clearly, the atomic bomb is. and the narrator is saying this is very calm tones, smashing through buildings. causing a burn worse than your worst sunburn. these are all ways to take this knowledge and convey it, but in a way that maybe children would understand it would be a part of their world. the other side is, not just conveying what it is you're actually seeing, knowing that you're doing this or being a part of this, but what to do. the narrative there also takes a kind of domestication tone, right? it talks about responding to a bomb is not unlike responding to a fire, right? or an automobile accident, right? these are all things that could happen in your daily life, just at atomic bomb to the list.

if not greg jacobs as well. we are getting at the stage now where you have adversarial witnesses who made talks and we will learn more about with the investigation is doing and its direction. >> very significant to chat with the cnn reporter, where he was talking with aaron burnett or he made significant comments. susan, we've seen so much movement with the 1-6 committee and the investigation in georgia. does it seem like the federal investigation is picking it up? >> you, know the punditry about grand juries is a dangerous game, don. i would say it's clearly significant to be interviewing marc short and greg jacobs, because there are very important witnesses who directly saw the pressure campaign that donald trump mounted on his own vice president, mike pence, and by some accounts, when we ultimately find out which marc short testified, but he has told others that pence dozens of times made clear to his advisers he was not going to go along with trump's, frankly, scheme, this idea and notion that was being pres

that would be greg jacob, pence's legal counsel.h men, of course, had a front row seat to the extraordinary pressure campaign on mike pence by trump and his allies, people like john eastman, to get pence to stop the certification of president joe biden's election victory on january 6th. wall street journal reports these stunning details about their testimony. quote, one area of interest to prosecutors was a january 4th, 2021, oval office meeting where conservative lawyer john eastman pushed pence in trump's presence to either reject the electoral votes outright or suspend the proceedings and asked several state legislatures to re-examine the results. greg jacob testified to the january 6th select committee about that meeting as well. when he did so, he said that john eastman knew that his plan was a violation of federal law. watch. >> so during that meeting on the 4th, i think i raised the problem that both of mr. eastman's proposals would violate several provisions of the electoral count act is. mr. eastman acknowledged that that w

jacob, how did vice president pence and mrs. pence react to that? >> with frustration. >> with frustration. yeah, i think that he was probably a little frustrated from that situation. >> now today, more news. abc news reporting that cassidy hutchinson, of course you know her from the hearings. the star witness of last month's jaw-dropping, surprise committee hearing. also cooperating with the department of justice in some capacity. they reportedly reached out to her specifically in response to that testimony. i mean the department of justice did. hutchinson testified that trump chief of staff mark meadows was warned of potential violence on the six. that there were white house discussions about the seditious gains like the oath keepers and proud boys who had been charged with sedition. and the damning revelations that trump knew the crowd was armed before he sent them to the capitol. and that he wanted to go with him. >> i was in the vicinity of a conversation when i overheard the president say something to the effect of, you know, i don't care that

you know jacobs.l me a little bit about what they're testifying to in that grand jury. >> i feel like there's no one more apropos to testify to what they witnessed in the days that lead up to january 6th -- , what was going on internally in the white house. what the president was trying to do -- webb eastman was trying to do. what greg jacob -- him and i worked very closely together, he is a man of integrity. and he believes very much so in the rule of law in this country. so i have no doubt that they talked about the amount of pressure placed on the pence team and on mike pence himself. >> shan, why haven't we heard from mike pence? i know there are people in the line. help people understand. why not the proverbial? why not that person? >> two issues. they are politically, which i'm not the expert on. he probably does not want to go on record -- , keep that as little as possible. >> no witness wants to do that -- we don't care about that in doj. >> doj is going to be slightly concerned with what is t

>> barragan, kahele and jacobs, they will vote yes on the green amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north dakota seek recognition? >> as the member designated by timmons taylor and gonzalez, they will vote no. >> as the member designated by miss rice, that member will vote aye on the green amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition. >> as the member designated by mr. up ton, he will vote nay. and as the member designated by mr. katko, he will vote no on amendment 448. >> mr. speaker as the member designated by mr. crist ms. wasserman schultz, they will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bentz, i inform the house that he will vote on amendment 448. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. brown of maryland, he will vote. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the

jacob died at the scene. tina is now on life support at loma linda children's hospital after suffering several broken bones and a severed spinal cord. the chp is investigating saying they believe the suspect vehicle is a bright orange 2021. polaris, razor turbo asked or has 4. it was too hard for jacob's father to come and speak on the death of his son. so we wrote a message for his daughter, jacob sister, cassandra, to read j cope. >> daddy loves you very we will stop >> jacob's dad saying he was a straight a honor roll student with so much to live for. >> my heart is crushed beyond repair. he did not deserve what happened to him. please help bring justice to my son. ever you are stop being a coward and do what's right in step forward. if you know who did this, please report them. if you are related to this coward, please report them reporting in loma linda. i'm shelby nelson. >> bay area music legend carlos santana is recovering after he collapsed on stage. the 74 year-old musician was performing at pine mu

jacobs of new york, i inform the house that mr. jacobs will vote yea on h.r. 521. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by the following members, barragan, roybal-allard, cardenas, speier, kahele and peters, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 521. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. katko of new york, i inform the house that mr. katko will vote yea on h.r. 521. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by mr. brown, i inform the house that mr. brown will vote yes on the motion to suspend. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by mr. thompson and mr. kelly, both of pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. thompson and mr. kelly will vote yes on h.r. 521. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the ge

there's also one that greg jacob described in his testimony to the january 6 committee. he said that on january 5 he had another conversation with eastman in which he said, look, we're going to lose 9-0 in the supreme court if we take up this idea of yours. and so these are key conversations that prosecutors would be interested in because we know, again, we know from the attorney general this is the most important investigation in the history of the justice department and it is looking directly at the issue of the effort to overturn the election, to discard the results and to keep the former president in power. this is the closest, as you pointed out, the closest we've heard of criminal prosecutors of the justice department, getting into the trump white house. and it directly, at least indicates they would have been talking to people who had direct conversations with the former president. a very big deal. >> a very big deal indeed. evan perez, appreciate the reporting to continue the conversation to share the reporting and insights, jeff zeleny, 'the former federal prose

the other thing that jacobs talks about is the way in which this film acknowledges and now we're kind of transitioning to attitudes towards education, right? so the idea that you would have to respond as a child by yourself to an atomic bomb rather than through a teacher or some authority figure right is a real shift. it's a shift in traditional social roles that is really part and parcel of the new atomic world, right? so what the film does is they assure children that grown-ups will be around. so i'm quoting from the film. now older people will help us by the way. it's a adult narrator pretending to be a child, right? older people will help us like they always do but there might not be any grown-ups around when the atomic bomb explodes. then you're on your own. right so they can help you get across the street. they can help you find a shelter. but in that moment, what are you going to do to respond? and so really kind of trying to heighten the alert of the children when you're on your own be aware of of when this is when this is happening so places like you can see the girl carrying

the goal of this film, bo jacobs talked about in his article, atomic kids, it's to teaching children atomic attack by themself. that's important, right? part of what is going on here -- there's two parts to what is going on here. on one hand, you have to inform children what it is they are actually see, and if they see a nuclear attack. so, we see a, kind of, i am going to talk about this as kind of domesticate,-ing but beau jacobs says making the threat normative, right? something is scary, an atomic attack. you cannot show film of two children, right? it's too horrifying. so instead, using that medium of animation. they portray that bright light, right? the light is described as a bright flash, brighter than the sun. and then it transitions into the animation, where, clearly, the atomic bomb is. and the narrator is saying this is very calm tones, smashing through buildings. causing a burn worse than your worst sunburn. these are all ways to take this knowledge and convey it, but in a way that maybe children would understand it would be a part of their world. the other side is, not

cnn reported earlier today that marc short, greg jacobs testimony shows how the investigation inside the trump white house. but the post tonight going even further with that, ryan, give me some details on conversations with trump. how does this all fit together, sir? >> well, you know, don, for a long time there has been at least some criticism of merrick garland and the attorney generals office that they have not done enough to specifically linked the events of january six to donald trump. but their actions over the past two weeks or so show that garland's investigation is getting increasingly closer to trump itself. and the post reporting tonight, coupled with what we have reported about the grand jury testimony and the different people who have come before and answered questions about this investigation showed that garland and his team are not just satisfied with this band of advisers around trump, who were influencing him and basically telling him what he wanted to hear as related to the election and the role mike pence could play. but that they are specifically interested in tru

jacobs covered. one of them is the knowledge of illegality and of the eastman plot and all of the great jacobs testimony, and eastman says we might do 7-2 and he says no, no, no, you're right. how much -- to what degree are short and jacobs fact witnesses to knowledge of criminality that trump was leaded down a path that he was alerted to was illegal. >> i want to be careful here because there are multiple crimes being considered in this investigation for what i will just loosely refer to as team trump, but mark short and greg jacob are very important fact witnesses to pieces. there are a lot of fact pieces to the way in which trump pulled levers and used his officialdom. his office, the white house machinery to try to push the big lie and block joe biden from ascending to his rightful place in the white house from the votes of the american people. pence's two senior aides have a lot of firsts testimony to provide. they were in the room with president trump. they were on the phone with their boss and

if not, greg jacobs as well. so they're getting at the stage where you had adversarial witnesses who may talk. and we will learn a lot more about what the investigation is doing in this direction. >> we have some very significant to chat with the cnn supporter, we're talking to erin burnett, real talk about that later remain some significant comments. susan, we have seen so much movement with the 16 committee and the committee in georgia. that's a scene with the federal investigation is picking up? >> you know, punditry about the grand jury is a dangerous game, don. i would say that it is clearly the significant to be interviewing marc short and greg jacobs, because they are very important witnesses who directly sought the pressure campaign that donald trump mounted on his own vice president, mike pence. by some accounts, it is interesting to see when we ultimately find out what marc short testified, that he has told others that pence dozens of times made clear on his advisers that he was not going to go along wi

the grand jury, also reportedly heard from pence's top legal adviser, a man by the name of greg jacoby recognize who previously testified before the january six committee. he had a big sort of showdown with eastman, about pence's ability of unilaterally changing the election. their testimony signals the attorney general's investigation, and the department of justice investigation which has been quite unfolding in the background, and has further expanded its scope, from the actual insurrection itself, and the people that were in the building, to the plotting of the coup attempt. democratic congresswoman elaine luria of virginia sits on the january six committee, and joins me now. congresswoman, let me just start on that news. obviously, i know these are completely parallel tracks, and you have no special vision into whatever the department of justice is into. but given the fact that your investigation has made public the role of greg jacob in resisting the eastman legal theory, which would've essentially 100 american democracy. are you encouraged by the fact that short and jacob, high-

two hours of l boris johnson, jacob reese mogg and borisjohnson, jacob reese mogg and they are backingis competing for the overall victory but is particularly competing for the right of the conservative party. i've sat with her in cabinet now for some _ i've sat with her in cabinet now for sometime — i've sat with her in cabinet now for some time and i'm very aware that sometime and i'm very aware that she is_ some time and i'm very aware that she is a _ some time and i'm very aware that she is a very— some time and i'm very aware that she is a very strong brexiteer than both of— she is a very strong brexiteer than both of us — she is a very strong brexiteer than both of us. she has consistently argued — both of us. she has consistently argued for— both of us. she has consistently argued for the policies and am particularly concerned about the 14 million _ particularly concerned about the 14 million people who voted for a manifesto and voted for a government that the _ manifesto and voted for a government that the candidate that we select and for— that the candidate that we select and

>> as the member designated by congress members barragan, cardenas, kahele, jacobs and jacobs, they will vote yes on h. con. res. 45. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler of pennsylvania, he will vote yes on house resolution 45. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, mrs. jayapal, mr. defazio and mr. pascrell, mr. payne and mr. sires, these members will vote yes on h. con. res. 45. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from utah seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. chris stewart, i inform the house that mr. stewart will vote yes on h. con. res. 45. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. pingree, mr. pappas, ms. kelly and ms. kell leger fernandez, these members will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

also testifying, pence's former white house counsel greg jacob. both were subpoenaed by the justice department, but nbc news camera set up for steve bannon's trial recorded short and his attorney leaving the federal courthouse last friday. just showing up. and short and jacob are the highest ranking trump administration officials known to have cooperated with the doj probe. both gave testimony to the january 6 committee and jacob, you will recall, was a live witness during a key hearing last month. meanwhile, member of the january 6 select committee congresswoman elaine luria revealed new testimony showing how former president trump edited a speech that was meant to condemn the insurrection. she tweeted this. it took more than 24 hours for president trump to address the nation again after his rose garden video on january 6 in which he affectionately told his followers to go home in peace. there were more things he was unwilling to say. here is some of the video testimony. >> i'm not sure when those conversations began because they could have start

and jacobs was there for 10, almost decades. because, you know, the last decades it takes at least not a 10. yes. to get back to where he sponsors, and that's normally, you know, we, i, 6 of the kind of, so it's i to looking at other competitors of developing countries and, you know, how they go out of production of, in, according to corruption, how long it takes to get out of it. so if you look at an african situation, you know, some african grayson lucas's independence. not at the moment. you know, if it comes to spend 5 or 10? yes, systemic caracas apart. you think it takes about 10 to, to even some cases. 20 yes, and then of course i've seen some countries. i'm never gotten out of the corruption where the buck where i'm so you can't get out of the space if the company is still there. so what we need, we need a step down actually off the governing party. i get new people to come in. i mean, that's really the only way to renew the company to state farm. the society countries, our culture, dakota, not much confidence from other

i think, you know, very sad because do not understand that you know, the corrections i did is jacob's president, she was systemic. i mean, you know, there was a corruption not having to states cross enough policy is cross and rhetoric of ideas. you know, procurements or sort of corruption of the policy of the governing party. now normally a society is once you get that kind of systemic corruption. and jacobs was there for 10, almost decades because you know, the last decades it takes at least not a 10. yes. to get back to where his thoughts are, and that's normally, you know, we, i, certain kind of, so it's i to looking at other competitors of developing countries and you know, how they go out of production. and when they got in a collection how long it takes to get out of it. so if you look at african situation, you know, some african grayson lucas is independence. not at the moment. you know, if it comes to spend 5 or 10? yes, systemic caracas apart. you think it takes about $10.00 to $2.00, even some cases? 20. yes. and then of course i've seen some countries. i'm never gotten out

quickly because in addition to the legislation today we will have a moment of silence for officers jacob chestnut and gibson who were killed protecting the congress in 1998, on a date that ms. pelosi: good morning. exciting day for us, we have important legislation on the floor. may have to lee more quickly because in addition to the legislation today we will have a moment of silence for officers jacob chestnut and gibson who were killed protecting the congress in 1998, on a date that occurs over the weekend. between the motion to recommit and the vote on final passage we'll be honoring them. we followed the lead of their families in terms of how they want it to be observed. this is their request for this year. on my way here i learned that our president has covid. i way hert our president has covid. i understand the symptoms are light. i hope they continue to be so. that was my experience. and i hope that that's the case for the president. yesterday we had the first lady of ukraine address members of congress. i was so pleased we had such a bipartisan turnout, house and senate, leader m

jacobs, a co-lead on this legislation.he speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from california is recognized. ms. jacobs: thank you, mr. chairman, for making sure this bill could come to the floor so swiftly. thank you to my friend, congresswoman manning, for your partnership on co-leading this bill with me. and thank you to speaker pelosi for her continued leadership in this post-roe reality. madam speaker, this bill could not be more important. because for me and for tens of millions of americans these threats from justice thomas and the supreme court to take away our right to contraception are not abstract. i have lived my entire life with this constitutional right to contraception, and it's a right i have exercised for decades. whether it was the birth control pills i used when i was a teenager to address debilitating cramps, the i.u.d. i relied on for years, or plan b i used at times that was thankfully available over the counter when i needed it. i'm probably the first person ever to speak about using plan b on the hou

. >> marc short and greg jacob, both appearing in front of a federal grand jury testifying as part ofminal investigation that has expanded to examine attempts to prevent the certification of the 2020 election. >> i can confirm i did receive a subpoena for the federal grand jury and i complied. under advice of counsel, i can't say much more than that. >> short was mike pence's chief of staff, jacob his chief counsel. both were key witnesses to the house january 6th select committee. jacobs testifying publicly about the pressure campaign on pence and the buildup to the capitol riot. >> mr. eastman was opine that there were two legally viable arguments as to authorities that the vice president could exercise two days later on january 6th. >> the attorney general himself making it clear that no one, including donald trump, is beyond the reach of their prosecution, and they are specifically concerned about attempts to overturn the 2020 election. >> we will hold accountable anyone who was criminal responsible for attempting to interfere with the legitimate, lawful, transfer of power from on

— bring an end to it after brexit, jacob reese mike initially set a target — jacob reese mike initiallyget all— target of i think five or six years to get all this legislation and things— to get all this legislation and things changed are stopped or ended and liz— things changed are stopped or ended and liz truss is talking about getting — and liz truss is talking about getting it inside three, which was impossible before you started talking — impossible before you started talking about shrinking the size of the civil— talking about shrinking the size of the civil service. actually shrinking the civil service by 90.000 _ shrinking the civil service by 90,000 which is about a fifth of its workforce _ 90,000 which is about a fifth of its workforce will make it absolutely impossible. but what you got here and he _ impossible. but what you got here and he is — impossible. but what you got here and he is right is she's not talking to us_ and he is right is she's not talking to us and — and he is right is she's not talking to us and what's possible. she is doing much— to us and what's possibl

and both marc short and greg jacobs have given testimony before the january six committee.it. it was live, a lot of that testimony, about just how crazy this plot was, and trump's aiding and abetting and encouragement of it. so all that is now being tied up, presumably, to the grand jury. it's a very big deal, you know, in ordinary times, the idea that a white house official would be brought before a grand jury's big, huge news. we are learning of it a little bit, just because we are hearing so much of trump's wrongdoing, and so much. but this is a very substantial step. >> yamiche, you've covered the former guy for quite some time. and we've seen it, time and again, when someone speaks out against him who was part of his circle, he always says, they are our coffee boy -- i don't know them. they were irrelevant. short and jacobs, how significant are they? how senior were they, at least in mike pence world? >> they were incredibly significant, and incredibly senior in the trump white house. of course mark short was chief of staff to vice president mike pence. before, that wa

jacobs were both interviewed as well. that is all bearing fruit. now the question is, does the department have the goods right now? do they need more? do they try to flip a chinese man or dreadfully clark or mark meadows? none of these are guys who are particularly known for being particularly strong or stable so they all may be targets. the other big question is what is the justice department going to bring former vice president mike pence before a grand jury? i think they have to. i'd be very curious about andrew weizmann's views on, up to me that's part of the story. pence's aides have heard the story, but i think everybody should hear from him himself. >> that's a good point, because the grand jury is a totally different appointment from the -- it's 100 percent private. the vice president's testimony is absolutely secret and can only be revealed in a later court proceeding, whether might be a statement from the grand jury that is quoted. and so, there is no spectacle aspect to it, but there is a huge historic influx to the point that we do is s

greg jacob and marc short testimony fits into that mosaic perfectly.y themselves it would be harder to plot the trajectory, but when you connect all the dots it really points to liability. that is not a guarantee of charges or conviction. and you have to put it together with something else we've discussed a lot, the georgia investigation where there is an even faster acceleration. so you see a pincer's movement on donald trump and perhaps this will be the occasion in which he cannot dodge criminal liability. >> yeah, look, i mean, people obviously -- we do want to pump the brakes before making any assumptions but people point out that an indictment of an ex-president is unprecedented, so is what he is credibly accused of which is interfering, trying to overturn an election. i think folks who have had an interest in the outcome of an indicted president which isn't good for the country i think have been frustrated but have not appreciated the fact that the doj can and should be operating at its own pace beneath the surface of things. there are folks -- l

with us, one of the lawmakers arrested yesterday, california congresswoman sara jacobs.ith us. why did you and your colleagues decide to go out and commit civil disobedience, as you put it? >> for me, representing california where i'm proud to still have the right to access an abortion, for now, i felt it was really important for me to go out and show that we are not backing down and we're not going to stop fighting until every person across this country has the same right to access abortion. this fight is currently being fought on people's bodies across this country. we are hearing horrific stories of people in doctors' offices, emergency rooms that can't get the care they need. it om felt right for those of us in congress, for those that have power, to put our bodies on the line to fight and protect for those who can't do that right now. >> is this the first time you've been arrested for doing something like this? and would you be willing to do it again, if you had to? >> it was my first time. i got some very angry text messages from my parents after, but, look, i thin

jacobs, a co-lead on this legislation.he speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from california is recognized. ms. jacobs: thank you, mr. chairman, for making sure this bill could come to the floor so swiftly. thank you to my friend, congresswoman manning, for your partnership on co-leading this bill with me. and thank you to speaker pelosi for her continued leadership in this post-roe reality. madam speaker, this bill could not be more important. because for me and for tens of millions of americans these threats from justice thomas and the supreme court to take away our right to contraception are not abstract. i have lived my entire life with this constitutional right to contraception, and it's a right i have exercised for decades. whether it was the birth control pills i used when i was a teenager to address debilitating cramps, the i.u.d. i relied on for years, or plan b i used at times that was thankfully available over the counter when i needed it. i'm probably the first person ever to speak about using plan b on the hou

host: i was interested when jacob read said he was supporting the liz truss.proper brexiteer and sufficiently euro skeptic. for people watching outside of the u.k., to what degree is being a prophet -- proper brexiteer still important thing? reporter: what is really important about that statement is it shows how far we have potentially moved from the referendum itself. we have heard comments like that made about liz truss who voted remain. we have also seen tory mp's opposed to him critique the brexit credentials of rishi sunak, saying he is not strong enough when it comes t brexit. we are seeing the faultlines shift. now there is certainly an element to this contest that is about the ongoing negotiations around brexit will be handled. trading agreements with northern island which has been a point of tension over the last few years within the tory party. one of the key things which jacob talks a lot about is brexit's opportunities, that was his role in the cuent cabinet. there is a lot of talk today in various leadership bids about what levels of deregulation

jacob is a joke, obviously for somebody week as well. if i cheat, i got it. go run on others, how much is cut off the how much use way onto the what's the result? ok, dr. trevino have leaking? sure. hard job that i thought was just because of the jordan. how may you make sure that coach gonna welcome letter? he will be honeycup, but do you know whether it was calling on behalf checks on the news leader before we don't get the student was the bus obviously it has, you know, thought a good bunch of other students, you know, walking after that's what you got on the air dot issue my, you know that about that about of the way i would talk to you a couple that i see she was going to be done about that before he did. but alan bar as possible on the jeff, why our lean bar as bottom magma shot the shot than most like you better my touch later. key. next sentiment some by semi eat from shaw the long saga. immediate shot that he bought our lean more as the one is about him action. even better models. i mean, look at this one of the lindsay come, they do the chase of dil

. >> after the intent to reverse roe v wade was first leaked san diego congresswoman sara jacobs strap did the my body my day to act with the bill. she aims to create a new national standard to protect personal reproductive health data overseen by the federal trade commission. this is some of our most sensitive and personal data are and reproductive health data. >> and it deserves the highest level of privacy and protection that the u.s. government can provide. jacobs proposal would limit information that companies can retain to what is strictly necessary to provide their service and prohibit them from selling it or the user could sue if passed, would protect people from having that data disclosed to law enforcement where abortion or contraceptive services have been outlawed. privacy is a foundational concern for san francisco based nonprofit electronic frontier foundation which endorsed the my body by day to act. >> so this is a very strict rule that should limit how businesses are processing people's reproductive health data. this will increase their privacy against the businesses. b

jacob, is a joke. obviously somebody because of the when she, they got it, they go round on others and how much is cut off the how much use way? sure. what's the result? okay, doctor, about that a child have leaky. should you high job that i thought of the visual because of the joint on how make you my goose, the coach going on? i hope that he will be funny. but do you know whether it was i'm calling on behalf of the leader before we didn't get the student was the bus was obviously it said that it has your daughter. good. we're going to bunch of other students. you know what? that's what you're the only daughter should my database, well that about this you know more way or i would tell you a couple that i see she was going to be done about that before you come by tomorrow . but alan bar as possible on the why our lean board as magma shot the shot than most like you better my touch, the key next sediment some but i me eat from sure. the long saw the medium shot that he bought. our board as the one is ab

jacob recalled what he said to eastman about a vice president being able to name who won the electionjohn, back in 2000, you weren't jumping up and saying al gore had this authority to do that. you would not want kamala harris to be able to exercise that kind of authority in 2024 when, i hope, republicans will win the election, and i know you hope that, too, john." and he said, "absolutely. al gore did not have a basis to do it in 2000. kamala harris shouldn't be able to do it in 2024. but i think you should do it today." ( audience boos ) >> stephen: it's just a classic case of "do as i say, not as i coup." ( laughter and applause ) really? ( laughing sheep sound ) really? ( laughing sheep sound ) okay. then they played footage of jacob explaining what the president knew about the crime, and when he knew it: >> did john eastman ever admit, as far as you know, in front of the president, that his proposal would violate the electoral count act? >> i believe he did, on the 4th. >> stephen: okay, the 4th. but that's two whole days before the 6th. and everyone knows the president's got the