well, so far we've heard from the former president jacob seumas lawyers and they're arguing why he should remain out on medical role. and that so ruling by the high court to december should be overturned. the i quoted found that he, he's a release on medical parole was invalid because it hadn't gone through a parole board, which is the normal process. and in fact, had been issued by the former head of correctional services at the time, who is known to be an ally of the former presidents. but his lawyers are saying that they have been questioned about whether not the form of president has a terminal illness. but much of the arguments we're hearing in the court behind us really have to do with the president, the former president's condition, and the reasons why he should stay out on medical parole and not return to court. if we look back, he was sentenced to 15 months in prison for contempt of court, often not appearing as a commission of inquiry into corruption. and those who, again, or against the former president's release, such as an opposition party in various civil society groups, is