maybe they turn on the tv to watch something else that got preemed like jalalabad or something and theyere like oh, damn, it's on every channel. we're just going to watch. they are like it's probably a great show. every episode is like, how do you think he died? probably a suicide bomb. that's usually what it. and then there is like one guy would comes in, i guess you could say is phone was really blowing up. wow! man. i'm not surprised that even the taliban was talking about the debate because everyone is still talking about this debate. and not even really the debate as a whole. it's just this one moment in the debate that hillary set up like a pro. >> one of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest, he loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. and he called this woman miss piggy. then he called her miss housekeeping because she was latina. donald, she has a name, her name is alecia machado. >> where did you find her? >> and she has become a u.s. citizen. >> oh really? >> and you can bet shetion's going to vote this november. >> okay, okay.

it discredited already very contestable government in jalalabad and the government was not able to stay. we just watched the fighting take place. a key problem for the afghan government has in for it the decade and a half, governments and local aids. for many afghans, it is a brutal and thuggish entity, but they provide more stable and predictable governance than governance that is constantly contestable, governance that is weak and handed over to the alc, or governance that is outright discriminatory. for a decade and a half, it was one of the most politically problematic, vicious places in afghanistan and it has not been difficult and the city has been taken from the taliban. the issue of pakistan is very important, but it is almost used as an excuse to not improve politics and government that they need to improve themselves. the convenient distraction on both sides for perpetuating policies that -- targeting needs to become a political. while it makes perfectly good sense to try to take away the central safety from the telnet and pakistan, we need to be asking about the political imp

clear terrain and want to make sure it's safe from the taliban coming up from the southwest because jalalabad had several car bombs and several pressures on the population. the united states did not plan this. coalition did not plan this. this was their effort. we advised them a little bit on some operations but they did it. they went forward with a tactical command and control element, the corps commander and a small staff forward, set up a base and had three brigades maneuver into battle space that was attacked and contested by both isil, k.p. and the taliban. their first operation in 48 hours, they cleared 167 i.e.d.'s by themselves with no fatalities. >> this is in the spring or summer of 2015? col. vowell: summer of last year. so from the perspective of leaving in may of 2011 when they us to go with them on every mission and operation just about to afghan security forces leading a combined arms tactical effort in the field without much coalition assistance, they were using their own d-30 howitzers, their own aviation, and ground maneuver to include engineers, infantry, etc., in concert t

it discredited already very contestable government in jalalabad and the government was not able to stay. we just watched the fighting take place. a key problem for the afghan government has in for it the decade and a half, governments and local aids. it is a brutals, and thuggish entity, but they provide more stable and predictable governance than governance that is constantly istestable, governance that alc,and handed over to the or governance that is outright discriminatory. half, it wasand a one of the most politically places inc, vicious afghanistan and it has not been difficult and the city has been taken from the taliban. the issue of pakistan is very usedtant, but it is almost as an excuse to not improve politics and government that they need to improve themselves. convenient distraction on both sides for perpetuating needses that -- targeting to become a political. while it makes perfectly good sense to try to take away the central safety from the telnet and pakistan, we need to be asking about the political implications of that. ask about if we kill this taliban commander, whet

clear terrain and want to make sure it's safe from the taliban coming up from the southwest because jalalabad had several car bombs and several pressures on the population. the united states did not plan this. coalition did not plan this. this was their effort. we advised them a little bit on some operations but they did it. they went forward with a tactical command and control element, the corps commander and a small staff forward, set up a base and had three brigades maneuver into battle space that was attacked and contested by both isil, k.p. and the taliban. their first operation in 48 hours, they cleared 167 i.e.d.'s by themselves with no fatalities. >> this is in the spring or summer of 2015? colonel vowell: summer of last year. so from the perspective of leaving in may of 2011 when they needed us to go on every mission and operation just about to afghan security forces leading a combined arms tactical effort in the field without much coalition assistance, they were using their own d-30 how witser, their own aviation, and ground maneuver to include engineers, infantry, etc., in concert