james acton is one of the world's leading experts on nuclear security. and that's one example of is phenomenal, that the growing entanglement between the nuclear and the nuclear give entanglements is important. it needs to be incredibly sensitive area of nuclear weapons is no longer separation off in its own bubble. it's become mixed in with masses of conventional warfare. and that's multitasking means that the systems are more likely to be a target in a crisis or a contract atlas or it could have a potential incentive to attack these. julie use a mom, the control aspect of a nuclear and the nuclear operations potentially, they do not in order to disrupt us, can venture was tied to, but that would have the fact of degrading us and you click on the control architecture. so there are more reasons to attack these targets. and on top of that comes the 2nd big change. they've entered the digital age, opening them up to the prospect of cyber attack systems and now rely on digital signals as opposed to analog signals. increasingly relying on things like ip base

james acton is one of the world's leading experts on nuclear security. and that's one example of this phenomenon that the growing entanglement between the nuclear i'm the new to this idea of entanglement is important. it needs to be incredibly sensitive area of nuclear weapons, is no longer separation off in its own bubble. it's become mixed in with masses of conventional warfare. and that's multitasking means that the systems are more likely to be a target in a crisis or a concept atlas, or it could have a potential incentive to attack these jews used to mom the control assets. so the nuclear no new care operations potentially, they do not in order to disrupt us convention was tied to, but that would have the effect of degrading the us nuclear bombs of control architecture. so there are more reasons to attack these targets. and on top of that comes the 2nd big change. they've entered the digital age, opening them up to the prospect, the cyber attack systems, and now relying on digital signals as opposed to analog signals. increasingly relying on things

existence as being a knowledge by the us government are used exclusively for their operational, james acton, each one of the world's leading experts on nuclear security. and that's one example of this phenomenon that the growing entanglement between the nuclear and the don't give entanglements is important. it needs to be incredibly sensitive area of nuclear weapons is no longer separation off in its own bubble. it's become mixed in with masses of conventional warfare. and that's multitasking means that these systems are more likely to be a target in a crisis or a concept atlas, or it could have a potential incentive to attack these jewels used to mom to control the use of a nuclear, you know, new care operations potentially. they do not in order to disrupt us, can venture was tied to, but that would have the effect of degrading us new click on the control architecture. so there are more reasons to attack these targets. and on top of that comes the 2nd big change. they've entered the digital age, opening them up to the prospect of cyber attack systems and now relying on digital signals as o

in the house of assistant police on james acton, explains what happens next. if you find malicious towed in your network, it's very hard to know what that code does. it takes a long time to analyze the code, understand what the other site is doing. and this makes it very hard to know whether malicious code is just or is also for a sensitive opperation as well. and it just isn't crisis. yeah, had a chance. even if that code is used for the purposes, there is a danger that the u. s. might conclude that it's preparations for an attack on an early morning. s a malware sprint. the u. s. also has to work out and planted. that's a process called attribution time. and it is not easy. adding pressure to this fear and di did various countries that could have incentives to the side, the f, b, or path to cyber attacks by searching malware against us. so the warning system korea would haven't, instead of doing china would have an incentive doing. russia would have an incentive for doing it, maybe others took a me all that on certainty with the latvian crisis on going, russ