senator james buckley of new york that was sent out to likely the entire senate, the third paragraph of it reads, a majority of the senate has now hart proposal hart proposal that the judge would be directed to appoint a successer. whereas the president seems intent on appointing a prosecuter under the direct supervision of the attorney general. it would appear that the president's pr postal, without more, is unsatisfactory to both a majority of the people and of the senate. at the same time, i believe that the bay-hart approach would fundamentally alter the delicate balance of authority and division of function which are the great glory of the separation of powers. this is underlined and in the senator's handwriting it says correct on both counts. to a researcher that -- i want rested in this topic, that's information that could only be found on this document. one of the other major initiatives that he was known for was his work on nuclear nonproliferation. in specifically the senator saw a grave national threat to the united states in terms of national security. in securing fiscal

the next morning, james buckley the incumbent senator had a press conference and congratulated him ando debating him. they had differences on the issues. that used to be what people did on the morning after a primary victory at or -- your opponent winning the primary. that shows how far we've come. of course, you get out there -- i mean, gillum was impressive, he was outspent massively by three other candidates i think. >> yep. >> he won. if i were ron desantis, as a matter of clinical calculation, wouldn't it look for gracious, i'm looking forward to debating him on a million issues. i want to say that was an impressive primary campaign. i look forward to the campaign. no, we're in such a crazy partisan hyper political trumpy, not just trumpy, but political world that you've got to begin the attack the morning after the primary. >> yeah. well, you said it. >> socialist, really? that's a little childish, isn't it? >> the whole thing is just -- the people don't know when they're racist. we'll be right back. we'll talk about it. alright guys let's go! let's do this directions to the gree

in this letter from senator james buckley from new york that was sent out to the entire senate, the third paragraph reads, a majority of the senate has endorsed the bay hard proposal that judge sirotka would be moved to appoint a successor to archibald coxe. the president seems to -- contented appointed prosecutor under the direct supervision of the attorney general, this portion is underlined by the , it would appear the president's hopeful is unsatisfactory to the majority of the people and the senate. at the time i believe that the bay hard approach would delicately alter the balance of authority in executive functions which are the great glory of the principal separation of powers. this is underlined by the senator and in his handwriting below it it's is correct on both accounts -- it says, correct on both accounts. to researcher interested in this topic, that is information that can only be found by this unique document. one of the other tips that he was known for was his work on nuclear nonproliferation. specifically the president saw a grave national threat to the united states in

james burnham is a very authoritarian. he had been a trustee and he is a authoritarian thinker. your comments strongly and interestingly bring out buckley'smbivalent relationship with all of this and your notion of their desire for -- consort -- coercive conformity. this is a bigger image as a authoritarian. it's a powerful insight to me to merge from your comments of this panel. >> i would argue buckley is not seeking to use the power of big government to hearse conformity. he wants the south to be left alone and work out its own destiny. that implies an absence of the government and nationalism goes ballistic what eisenhower sends troops to little rock. >> [indiscernible]. >> that's true. this is the state's right of the conservative -- conservatism of the period. maybe the state is your friend and represents the people. there is this sense -- as far as the other aspect, buckley wanted a co-first that would come from society itself. the norm of society -- it kept pushing the society. it's always pushing for change and unsettling of the status quo. also disturbing the weight the american people should be and want it to be. he thought the