the killers of two—year—old james bulger were named after their trial. two-year-old james bulger were their trial. defendants, i adults, defendants children... after their trial. defendants, - adults, defendants children... the man who led _ adults, defendants children... iie: man who led that prosecution believes it is rightjenkinson and ratcliffe's identities are made public. ratcliffe's identities are made -ublic. , ratcliffe's identities are made ublic. , . . ., public. there is much, much good to follow if these _ public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases _ public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases are _ public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases are examined i follow if these cases are examined very fully — follow if these cases are examined very fully and the public know what went wrong in that particular familx — went wrong in that particular family. only then can we ask ourselves_ family. only then can we ask ourselves the question, could this happen— ourselves the question, could this happen in— ourselves the question, could thi

the killers of two—year—old james bulger were named after their trial. defendants, adults... the man who led that prosecution believes it's rightjenkinson and ratcliffe's identities are made public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases are examined very fully, and the public know what went wrong in that particular family. only then can we ask ourselves the question, "could this happen in ourfamily?" because at the moment we don't know what went wrong. the naming and shaming of them is a barrier— the naming and shaming of them is a barrierto— the naming and shaming of them is a barrier to rehabilitation. we know that it _ barrier to rehabilitation. we know that it creates troubles for their safety _ that it creates troubles for their safety in — that it creates troubles for their safety in prison, but also upon release — safety in prison, but also upon release because these are children at the _ release because these are children at the end — release because these are children at the end of the day and they need to he _ at the end of the day and they need to be

james bulger . happened to this child. james bulger. people had seen these two children take him. started to become this ridiculously big story. started to become this ridiculously big story . and i ridiculously big story. and i then became the voice of liverpool throughout the world. not that i wanted to be, but i was chosen because i broke story. i then got involved with denise. i got involved with ralph. i went to the trials when they were found and i went on they were found and i went on the marches to keep them in prison. i've heard the stories about them coming out. venables in particular, and telling everybody who he is . there's everybody who he is. there's been whispers that he's been by, um, denise s home, which is petrified her and she's lived how she has lived through the torturous times . and because he torturous times. and because he appears to be a dreadfully bad person, i think people should know if he's going to get married , who he should marry, or married, who he should marry, or who you are marrying. >> well, this is pete. can i just say this brings me this bnn

the killers of two—year—old james bulger named after their trial.were named after their trial. defendants, adults. defendants, children... the man who led that prosecution believes it's rightjenkinson and ratcliffe�*s identities are made public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases are examined very fully, and the public know what went wrong in that particular family. only then can we ask ourselves the question, "could this happen in ourfamily?" because at the moment we don't know what went wrong. scarlettjenkinson and eddie ratcliffe are just 16 years old. the decision to release their names will have implications for them and their families for the rest of their lives. but brianna's family see the end of the legal fight as a relief. justice for brianna, who lived a life, like her tiktok videos, loud and proud of who she was. nick garnett, bbc news. studio: rowan, the court is still sitting today, what is going on? this morning we have been hearing from the defence and prosecution ahead of sentencing, which is likely to take place this

the killers of two—year—old james bulger were named after their trial. - defendants, children... the man who led that prosecution believes it's rightjenkinson and ratcliffe�*s identities are made public. there is much, much good to follow if these cases - are examined very fully, _ and the public know what went wrong in that particular family. only then can we ask . ourselves the question, "could this happen in our family?" because at the moment, - we don't know what went wrong. scarlettjenkinson and eddie ratcliffe are just 16 years old. the decision to release their names will have implications for them and their families for the rest of their lives. but brianna's family see the end of the legal fight as a relief. justice for brianna, who lived a life, like her tiktok videos, loud and proud of who she was. nick garnett, bbc news. we'll pick up on that in a moment, but ijust want we'll pick up on that in a moment, but i just want to bring we'll pick up on that in a moment, but ijust want to bring you some live pictures from dover air force base in the u

. —— abducted and murdered james bulger. if family. -- abducted and murdered james ltulger-_ family.hese are children at the end of the day and they need to be given the space to grow and move beyond the crime. throughout the trial brianna ghey's were anonymous, now they are named, if one day they are safe to leave jail, they might be given a secret new identities but for now everyone knows what scarletjenkinson and eddie ratcliffe did. former chief crown prosecutor for north west england, welcome. ithink crown prosecutor for north west england, welcome. i think everyone will be struck by the mother of brianna ghey, esther, so many thoughts will be with that family and what they are trying to cope with now, remarkable words. i and what they are trying to cope with now, remarkable words. i don't know if! with now, remarkable words. i don't know if i could _ with now, remarkable words. i don't know if i could do _ with now, remarkable words. i don't know if i could do it, _ with now, remarkable words. i don't know if i could do it, you _ with now, remarkable words. i don't know if i co

it's interesting , isn't it, because the, um, the james bulger murderers , um, were james bulger murderersost on a daily basis to videos than it was of a disgusting nature and a very , disgusting nature and a very, very violent nature. >> those boys were used to watching that sort of stuff . watching that sort of stuff. mhm. um, and you can't help but ask what sort of backgrounds those kids come from . those kids come from. >> yes. well, maybe we shall find out at some point . find out at some point. >> but on the other hand, i mean , those boys. yes. uh killed and murdered brianna most terribly. but look what they've done to their own families. mhm i mean, their own families. mhm i mean, their families are probably going to have to move or change their names or would you want anything to do with one of those murderers ? now, if you were murderers? now, if you were related in any way , it's, it's related in any way, it's, it's just terrible . just quite get just terrible. just quite get your head around it. >> can you. well we'll be talking live to sophie reaper. uh, a little bit later on

, appears killed james bulger, one appears to absolutely.hasn't. >> and the other one hasn't. >> and they they >> and that's it. and they they need. of those two boys who need. so of those two boys who committed same crime, there committed the same crime, there have been two very, very different outcomes. it's different outcomes. so it's worth remember two worth always remember that two paths possible. but but paths are possible. but but equally board that set equally the board that set before reviewed cases before them reviewed their cases and freed and ultimately freed them made a mistake . mistake with venables. >> again they released >> time and again they released him twice. he had to be him at least twice. he had to be called back in because every single time got it wrong, he single time he got it wrong, he went to old ways. went back to his old ways. >> right. let's change tack. went back to his old ways. >> ringe_et's change tack. went back to his old ways. >> ringe have:hange tack. went back to his old ways. >> ringe have ?ange tack

and then if we look at james bulger's killers, venables , these guys venables especially, these guysey know there were ten when they committed but eight committed the murders, but eight years and venables years is nothing. and venables was recalled to jail . he's was recalled twice to jail. he's now in jail. he was given a new identity, he was very proud identity, but he was very proud of his and was telling of his crimes and was telling people real names. why people his real names. so why should give people new should we give people new identities? it's you're supposed. >> forgive me, paul, that that's our failing, it? um, in our failing, isn't it? um, in the sense that i'm not. i'm not trying to, um , uh, advocate on trying to, um, uh, advocate on behalf of venables at all. however um, if he's come out proud of what he's done, i mean, the rehabilitate in the system , the rehabilitate in the system, um, hasn't worked in his case, has it? >> but why are we bothering as a country to spend a fortune on, um, trying to rehabilitate people that can't be rehabilitate . and it's been a reha

referenced in our report so did the high- profile death of inmate jeffrey epstein in 2019 and james woody bulger in 2018 as we detailed in those public reports that were issued. when the public wonders whether the treatment of those two high profile inmates was unique, the answers, sadly, from our desk in custody report is that it was not. many of the desk we discussed in the report were the result of similarly serious management and operational failures. these include long-standing management and operational challenges that involve serious staffing shortages including correctional and healthcare positions. single selling of inmates, inappropriate mental healthcare designations of inmates. ineffective contraband interdiction and outdated camera security systems. staff failure to follow b.o.p. policies and procedures for and and ineffective untimely staff disciplinary process. indeed, one or more of these challenges was a contributing factor in many of the inmate deaths. and these long-standing challenges continue to present eccentric and critical threat to the b.o.p. safe and humane management o

mary bell killed two toddlers, jon venables and robert thompson murdered james bulger.ad a smile on his face. you know, i was speaking to ann on the saturday morning. the next time i saw ann, i was standing over her body in a mortuary. with...with eight stab wounds. whenjames bulger�*s murderers were tried, the case against them was led by sir richard henriques. after being found guilty, they were also named. now he says it's right the public know who brianna's killers really are for the greater good of society. there is much, much good to follow if these cases are examined very fully and the public know what went wrong in that particular family. only then can we ask ourselves the question, could this happen in ourfamily? because at the moment we don't know what went wrong. not everyone's in favour of courts identifying young offenders. the naming of them and the shaming of them is a barrier to rehabilitation. we know that it creates troubles for their safety in prison, but then also upon release, because these are children at the end of the day. and they need to be abl

ideology that ideology with something that motivates, example, motivates, for example, the murderers james bulgerg it. >> no, no no, no. but what you're saying is that because she's we need treat you're saying is that because she in we need treat you're saying is that because she in the we need treat you're saying is that because she in the same we need treat you're saying is that because she in the same manner! treat you're saying is that because she in the same manner as treat her in the same manner as someone who committed someone else who committed a murder bolger murder like of jamie bolger under think it's slightly under 16. i think it's slightly different because what motivated her was religious ideology, different because what motivated her that's religious ideology, different because what motivated her that's reconcerndeology, different because what motivated her that's reconcern.deol