management agreement with pacific cruise ship terminals, llc and passenger fee increase for the james r. herman cruise terminal. >> good afternoon, i'm john dull, planning division. this is an informational presentation, there is no action required this afternoon and it serves as prelude to an item we would hope to bring later this month on your management agreement between the port and metro. this is another step in a long circuitous effort and a balancing act to deliver a new primary cruise terminal to the city of san francisco. it has taken about 20 years, so you are right. sibs the new cruise terminal was proposed at piers 30-32, upon a failure the port commission performed an analysis on a cruise terminal and berth alternatives throughout the port in 1998 and resolved that the port would require a new cruise terminal and authorized an rfp for a developer to construct a two-berth cruise terminal at piers 30-32. while that pier 30-32 public-private partnership ultimately failed to produce a cus terminal, the portion that was faied, the watermark project, did generate $20 million in condo fee