you're watching bbc news — i'm james reynolds.w on the news that prime minister says she is sorry and accepts responsibility for the mistakes that have been made in her tax cutting plans — as her new chancellor announced he was tearing almost all of them up. in an interview tonight with our political editor chris mason — liz truss acknowledged that her plans had gone "too far and too fast" but insisted she wasn't going anywhere and said she would lead the conservatives into the next general election. the prime minister has been speaking to our political editor chris mason. prime minister, who is to blame for this mess? first of all i do want to accept responsibility and say sorry for the mistakes that have been made. i wanted to act but to help people with their energy bills, to deal with the issue of high taxes but we went too far and too fast. i have acknowledged that, i have put in place a new chancellor with a new strategy to restore economic stability, and now what i'm focused on is delivering for the public. with the deliver

and art of the problem on the supreme court was justice james mcif reynolds. he was one of the four horsemen. he was a wilson appointee. he was in the wilson administration with fdr. and as attorney general, mcreynolds had drafted, in effect, a court-packing plan. when cummings found that and told it to roosevelt, they both thought it was just such an incredibly wonderful, karmic thing to take on mcreynolds with the mcreynolds proposal, if you will, that i think they got too attached to the idea, and that kind of held their enthusiasm in february and march and into the springtime before, finally, recalibration starts. >> so we've got another question here. from hi wife, she wants to know what determines how many justices can be on court? if does congress have the power to change that number, and can they change it down? as you said earlier, it's been five, it's been seven, you know? basically -- >> that is entirely a statutory matter. it's an ex-judiciary act, if you will. it could create a supreme court seat, or the one became vacant, it could abolish one. i

and art of the problem on the supreme court was justice james mcif reynolds. he was one of the four horsemen. he was a wilson appointee. he was in the wilson administration with fdr. and as attorney general, mcreynolds had drafted, in effect, a court-packing plan. when cummings found that and told it to roosevelt, they both thought it was just such an incredibly wonderful, karmic thing to take on mcreynolds with the mcreynolds proposal, if you will, that i think they got too attached to the idea, and that kind of held their enthusiasm in february and march and into the springtime before, finally, recalibration starts. >> so we've got another question here. from hi wife, she wants to know what determines how many justices can be on court? if does congress have the power to change that number, and can they change it down? as you said earlier, it's been five, it's been seven, you know? basically -- >> that is entirely a statutory matter. it's an ex-judiciary act, if you will. it could create a supreme court seat, or the one became vacant, it could abolish one. i

part of the problem on the supreme court was justice james make reynolds. he was one of the four horsemen. he was a wilson appointee. he had been in the wilson administration with fdr. as attorney general, mick reynolds had drafted, in effect, a court packing plan. when cummings found that in told it to roosevelt they both thought it was such an incredibly wonderful car mixing to take on mick reynolds. i think they got too attached to the idea. that held their enthusiasm in february, march, and into the springtime finally before recalibration started. >> we have another question from my wife, what's determines what's level of justices are on the court? does congress have the power to change that number? could they change it down? as you said earlier, it's been five, it's been seven. you know, is that? >> it is entirely a statutory manner. it is an axe judiciary act, if you will. to create a supreme court seat, if one became vacant and could've all-ish one. i do not think a law can abolish a sitting justice. the constitution protects against that. also in ol

reynolds goes to buford's aid. as he's bringing in the solomon meredith's iron brigade. turns around is hitting the back of the head with a bullet fired by some volley of probably james j. archer's brigade. who knows? and he falls to the ground dead. and we know the rest of the story the rest of the first core comes up eventually are committed to a fight abner doubleday is now the senior in command and i tell you i i have to feel for abner doubleday here. i don't i don't i don't come to his aid when he is sacked by mead because mead gets too reports from two different officers. that really don't aren't very complementary of doubleday. and mead has he can't convene committees to discuss this or try a case or anything else? yes. just make a decision. and he calls in john newton and puts him in the place of after doubleday, but doubleday. had had been told by reynolds. and he wrote a very fine article in battles and leaders after the war. he was told by reynolds that reynolds was going to go up to gettysburg was going to try to get the enemy to collect in front of him and the minute the enemy did he was to fall back to emmitsburg. that's what double day says. now this corr