jamie stewart. a defendant in the drugs trial. both guilty of contempt of court for discussing the case midtrial on facebook. despite clear rules forbidding jurors from talking to others, by this time jamie stewart had been acquitted but wanted to know what the jury thought of another defendant in the trial. what is happening with the other charge she asked. the juror replied can't get anyone to go. no one budging. please don't say anything because jamie, they could call a mistrial. i know i wouldn't do that to you. don't worry. in another exchange don't worry about that charge, no way it can stay hung for me. this is the second time isn't it. at least then you are all home and dry. the defendant replied you are mad. i really appreciate everything. and added later, keep in touch and i will get you a nice present. >> she has made legal history as the first juror guilty of contempt of court for using the internet, a modern twist on an old crime, one where the court is increasingly worried about. >> what i expect will emerge from the