we usually all have a list, now let's name the list here or there, any name , al-janah or janah. and the second faction, now depending on the current political conditions, their acceptance may be less , but sometimes they still have a lot of votes , they don't have a few votes, but they don't have any seats in the parliament anymore, and being proportional helps to let's say ok, if for example one person in tehran won with one million votes, that person won't be the first person , the political current ruling the public opinion should be the political current determining the seats in the parliament, because in the end the people themselves are choosing, in that case the people will choose, but well you have one share to one, well, no, for example, suppose that instead of 30 people, we may say that you vote for one person for each citizen, then we will come and vote for one person one by one, instead of saying yes, i understand what you mean. yes, i think this method is much better. yes, yes, the people chose the president do it or the people's assembly, well, no, in that case, th

janah also, for example, my inclinations may be against the representatives of faction d, for example a, and i don't have a representative, who do i turn to in the province, but if there is a proportional combination of two factions, they will vote. most of them are provincial a two-proportional proportional city has another problem with it. if you explain it, the people of tehran give each list, for example, 20% to a, 80% to b, list a approves 20% of the seats, the list is more than 80. how do you want the people who directly voted for me to go to my list, and i, who is below our list, for example, 400,000 voters, come to the top of the list, whose top is, for example, 300,000 voters, for example, how do you want, sam? 300 people are bad, if it is 400 people, look, you have to judge by the criteria of the majority. let me say on the headline, biki, that single vote is completely relevant in a majority system, and now you are in the same stream of senders. for example, if the tendencies of a stream are such that 80 % of them have a tendency to go to the first a list or the so-called s