talking about jane fonda -- asked him about it, and he said i profoundly disagree with what jane fonda did. i would get wounded again to give her the right to do it. the rights to disagree, to express one's opinions, whether in form or correct or not is a wonderful ride that many americans have given their lives for and fought for. i am proud to have contributed in some way to preserving america's freedom and americans right to disagree. host: philip, we will come back to you. if the volume is down. caller: police officers become policemen, and it is their responsibility to serve. as soldiers, they make the choice, if there is not a draft. that being said, i would like to see perhaps the u.s. government maybe not accepting oil, if that indeed was not their motivation to go there. it is quite evident from a good majority of folks believe that was the reasoning behind the invasion. guest: philip, i am sorry that so many people think that that was in fact the case. if that was the case, it was an enormously poor decision. the invasion actually increase the global price of oil and decrease

i've learned more about jane fonda last couple of months than i thought i ever would. [laughter] but i just wanted -- i just wanted -- 70 million people, what's with them, you know? they looked around and did research and we were from public television and they had good experience with public television and bad experiences with commercial groups said they gave permission we wanted and i made it clear i'm not here to look at your nuclear power plants. i am not here -- i'm not mike wallace. we are just going to learn about your culture and society and what motivates your people. so we could do anything we wanted. i guess, not everything because we had certain concerns because i wanted to see people being nonconformist and not kissing up to the society and i wanted to go to the clubs for instance and see how young people quote. blog owners are in favor what we are doing building understanding and have things mellowed out between the countries but they didn't want our camera because if they are letting people take their scarves off and hold hands they could close their lic

jane fonda, that ph.d. genius, taught us that nuclear power was so dangerous, that what we have done instead of using nuclear power we've begun relying on overseas oil and gas and burning coal. then remember the acid rain? that was a near high pitch. that's what we hear about global warming. ronald reagan stood up, put his hand and said, no, we are going to have a scientific research on this acid rain issue before we commit all sorts of regulations and taxes that will destroy our economy. luckily rage did that and when a $500 million study was complete, it verified the fact that acid rain was a minimal problem, not a major problem and minimal problem that didn't justify any of the draconian and raises in taxes and controls that were being suggested by those environmental alarmists. then, of course, the granddaddy of them all was many of the same people are now talking about global warming, were then talking about global cooling back in the early 1970's. some of the very same people, yes, and what happened t

i think a lot of the question of what to do with waste, i used to think it was driven by jane fonda and "the china syndrome" movie. that's old people. the younger people are thinking of simpson coming in and blowing up the city of springfield and think of that as nuclear energy. there's 13, 15, or more plants on the drawing board right now. it may take 20 years. what do i do if i don't have coal? i could use gas and oil. those are kind of bad. we tried to get the refinery done in indiana to handle canadian tar sands. another one over by detroit. they are going to be tied up for 10, 15 years. they were half of e.p.a. discharge. rahm emanuel and others are going we can't build that refinery. we don't want any in america. what are we -- i make 58% of the r.v.'s. what are you going to do put a little fan on the roof? international designs 800 people design the big trucks in my district. how are we going to deliver goods to market? the rail is already jammed. the canals are jammed. rivers are jammed. if we can't use trucks, which take up about 40% of the energy on our roads, how are we