. >> my name is jane marn, i'm with the california nurse's association and on the board that's a member for the coalition of healthcare planning. there's a huge problem with the environmental impact report and that's that it fails to analyze the healthcare applications of the plan. we support the primarily better alternative with a clinical anchor. that is environmental superior in terms of traffic in the analysis that's done and better for healthcare. the e.i.r. does not analyze the burden on city services for the services cpmc will no longer provide. cpmc has closed over 70% of psychiatric services despite a growing need for those services and instead those psyche patients are shifted to other providers. cpmc plans to close long-term care for the disabled and elderly. all of these would impact on the city's healthcare system. the e.i.r. does not analyze sutter's regionallization. sutter's business plan would entail ridding itself of 1,300 hospital beds in the bay area in a way that anticipates a transfer of patients between cities. cpmc's plan is part of the same business plan as sutt