conception occasioned roe v wade, that's crazy and i went online and i just sort of started googling and i saw that the pro-life movement was sort of desperate to find this person. norma jane rowe had given the child up for adoption and they looked at this person he or she as the serving living incarnation of their argument against abortion. they said they would say that had roe already been ruled upon when norma gave birth. they want to be able to say it's not abstract. but this human being you would have murdered and so it was sort of a very important anonymous person for them. and so i said, i'd like to find that person and i just had an inkling and i turned out to be right that he or she knew who they'd been bored to that somehow. they would have found out who their birth mother was well. i sent a note to norma. i found her name. it's okay. i have a four year old and a six year old. i'm used to insanity. yeah, this is nothing. i i got a note to to norma and and i identified myself and said, you know would it would you speak to me about what's going on? would you speak to me about the who the identity of your third child if you know who she is. and she said she didn't w

ashamed — the violence and intimidation, cynical manoeuvres like paying norma mccorvey, the real jane roedeath, said that she only said that because of the money given by the opposition movement. mr schenck says even the way in which the christian anti—abortion movement signed a sort of faustian pact with donald trump, he said that was shaming, too. do you have any sense of shame? well, you'll notice that i am not he, and i'm not a pastor. i'm not somebody who went from pro—life to pro—choice. perhaps because he was engaged in those things, that's all he saw. i don't know, i never knew him. i can say my own conversion came for authentic reasons, and out of love and justice, not because i want to manipulate or anything. wilberforce, in your own country, had similar motives of many people in the pro—life movement here, in the midst of all sorts of discrimination, and all sorts of refusing to see that speaking the truth to power is an important thing to do. so in the case of donald trump, the same. the idea that... are you putting your money behind donald trump running in 202a? you backed hi

ashamed — the violence and intimidation, cynical manoeuvres like paying norma mccorvey, the real jane roed that she only said that because of the money given by the opposition movement. mr schenck says even the way in which the christian anti—abortion movement signed a sort of faustian pact with donald trump, he said that was shaming, too. do you have any sense of shame? well, you'll notice that i am not he, and i'm not a pastor. i'm not somebody who went from pro—life to pro—choice. perhaps because he was engaged in those things, that's all he saw. i don't know, i never knew him. i can say my own conversion came for authentic reasons, and out of love and justice, not because i want to manipulate or anything. wilberforce, in your own country, had similar motives of many people in the pro—life movement here, in the midst of all sorts of discrimination, and all sorts of refusing to see that speaking the truth to power is an important thing to do. so in the case of donald trump, the same. the idea that... are you putting your money behind donald trump running in 202a? you backed him in 2016.

texas, which produced jane roe of roe v.pon an all male supreme court to make abortion legal 49 years ago. that's the state that has outlawed abortion completely, beginning at conception with no exception for rape or incest and the same with gay marriage. you would have thought again, this issue was settled. texas leadership is trying to turn back the clock. now, that is not us. i want the people in america outside of texas to know this. it is not who we are. it's not democrats, republicans or independents in the state. it is those who hold power today. the best way to challenge this, check this and overcome it is to win political power on november 8th. that's why we're in this race to get texas back to a place where we can all be proud of it. ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: we have to take a quick break. back with more beto o'rourke, everybody, stick around. ( cheers and applause ) ( band playing ) oh! you're doing it wrong, man. what's wrong with action figures? nothing. capital one shopping instantly searches for avai

they could file a lawsuit against the state of texas. did this in the seventieth year on behalf of jane roelogue of the designation of a party in a lawsuit, borrowed from roman law and a proper name for designation is unknown. let's say, if you were talking about a place, and not about a person, then you would call it a city. the defendant was the district attorney general. oh, the court ruled in favor of the woman, but did not cancel the existing laws, the case came to the supreme court, the validity of the consideration was not obvious. after all , the supreme court decides only real disputes woman by this time, she had given birth to a girl. they gave it up for adoption. this means that the conflict was settled to speak on behalf of all women, the norm could not, but based on the social importance of the matter. this is not the first time the court has made an exception. in history. after all, the situation could be repeated, the result in the trial was the decision that the right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy is guaranteed by the us constitution, she can have an abortion until the

jane roe was for abortion, but in 1995 became pro-life after getting religion. have not heard this on news, but i know that news knows and i was quite a bit of tv and read the paper -- host: thanks for your input. but as far as faith in institutions or your level of faith in institutions, how would you characterize that? caller: if they would tell the whole story and not shorten up things in the house of representatives and the senators, i think it would be good, but they just tell bits and pieces of it, and that is why you do not have a lot of faith in it. host: by the way, to the previous caller's highlight of television news, that category just above congress as far as people's level of trust, 11% when it comes to the poll taken in 2022, compared to 16% television, people who show a great deal of faith in television news. we have been showing you this poll, and to show you some highlights again, this is what gallup says are the level of trust in institutions that people have. u.s. institutions. a wide range, with small business, military, and police ranking u

as midterms are lacking for democrats, candidates plan to go hard on the issue of jane resets riot and overturning of roet he sees as that behavior. >> president biden: how quickly we forget the people were hurting and what did that crud want to do? forget it. >> efforts by officials across the country. >> mike: this rhetoric could backfire on democrats and bring the republican base to the polls and big numbers. ceo of the foundation for liberty and american greatness. former democratic state senator. welcome. >> happy fourth of july. >> mike: seem to. polling shows that 64% are saying president biden is too old to be president and 71% flat out say he should not run for a second term. then there is former obama secretary jeh johnson says that the president should make a decision in a hurry. >> i don't know that joe biden has definitively made up his mind to run in 2024. i'm sure at some point he will have that conversation with his family. my advice would be unconventional. if you are not running, make the announcement sooner rather than later. >> mike: it's the harper and on your side of the aisle? >> i

issued a safety report regarding jane's revenge, the same domestic terrorist organization responsible for posting flyers around d.c. that read the night scotus overturns roe v. wade hit the streets, you said you'd riot to our oppressors. if abortions aren't safe, you're not either. so, we've had that happen. since dobbs decision late on basic, and over 100 pro-life institutions have been recipients of threats, desecration, vandalism and arson. i ask unanimous consent to submit a list for the record from susan b anthony, pro-life america, issuing the recent violence. >> without objection. >> so, when we look at all the things that have happened, and i'm thinking, where is the outrage at the intimidation and coercion and violence for these? oh, i guess, ms. hawley, what should leaders like president biden and speaker pelosi and leader schumer be doing to hold these perpetrators accountable for the violence they are either threatening or causing around our nation? >> well, violence against anyone, especially against pregnancy care centers, especially against sitting justices of the united states supreme court, should be appropriately punished. they should be

wh was not as rtant as it' but it's the story of the jane collective, which is a group of women in chicago in the years leading up to 1973 when roego. before -- when it was illegal, before roe came to pass. and i can't believe that we're 50 years later back to that moment again where these women and this kind of collective energy is necessary to give people the health care that they need. the story is really about a woman whose life depends on an abortion, but how once you sort of make an exception for that woman really all these -- any woman who's in that situation i think believes that her life depends on it. >> anthony: who are your co-stars in this film? >> sigourney weaver, kate mara, chris messina. it's an incredible film. it comes out at the end of october. i'm really excited. >> anthony: end of october. >> yeah. [ cheers and applause ] >> anthony: all right, thanks to elizabeth. "press your luck" airs thursdays at 8:00 p.m. on abc. we'll be back with the bachelorettes gabby and rachel. [ cheers and applause ] with relapsing forms of ms, there's a lot to deal with. not just unpredictable relapses, all these other things, t

jane. can they fix that? it's a question many are asking just four months out from the mid term -- biden's numbers are low, and some are frustrated by his response to roethere's more mass shootings and inflation. friday, i'm a peacock show, i spoke with dan fight for who served as white house communications director during the obama administration. he's also the author of battle in the big lie, how fox, facebook, and maga media are destroying america. he tried to answer those questions. >> nobody messaging can stop the supreme court, whose majority have been reported -- from doing what they're doing. when you have to do, is you can't just take a vote. i think it's important to tell people to go vote for a plan. how do we get there? how do we fix what's this dead? i think the president did this very specifically, it took a little time to get there, but he says give me good to senators, i will support getting rid of the filibuster to codify roe v. wade. we're gonna use executive actions, we're going to campaign and work in states where we can protect abortion access for people. have an actual plan to do it. i think this is a good -- you can say just go a

jane's due process, an organization that works to achieve equality for women. you were at a houston women's clinic helping to escort patients seeking abortions at that facility when the news came out that roewade was overturned. what was your reaction to this ruling by the texas supreme court? i guess you're not that surprised, but the law going all the way back to 1925 now, it's just extraordinary. >> it is extraordinary. but i wasn't really surprised. i wouldn't expect anything good, abortion rights or civil rights of any kind, to come out of the texas supreme court. it's dominated 9-0 by republicans. and the chief judge himself is well-known as a very vocal opponent of abortion rights for a long time. >> this back and forth with the lower court blocking the ban, and now the texas supreme court allowing it. as a lawyer, do you feel like you're out of options now, particularly after what the supreme court did? >> well, you know, i'm not the lawyer on that case. i'm sure that the aclu and the center for reproductive rights are looking at options, you know, beyond the texas supreme court. the only other option is to look at the federal courts. it looks bleak, there's no doubt about it, beca