she said janet yellow don't miss the net 0 grand reset. price tag will be a $150.00 trillion dollars, which was how 0 hedge tweeted about it. they covered at the exact quote janet ellen said was quote, it's a global transition for which we have an estimated price tag. some have put the global figure between a 100 and a 150 trillion over the next 3 decades. 0 hedge then a few days later max, they quoted that they have a piece from eric peters, who is a c i o of one river asset management. he's a hedge fund manager. so hedge funds, c i o, once you say a $150.00 trillion dollars a few times, it honestly doesn't seem so big. says she at 1st said her statement said a 100 to a 150 trillion her following paragraph. this is how you shift the overton window. these programs are exciting, she said. but as big as the public sector effort is across all our countries, the 100 trillion dollar plus price tag to address climate change globally is far bigger. and you see the cost already appeared rather smaller. so 1st she said 100150 trillion. then the next

and we also heard from janet yellow and the us treasury secretary, calling for a wholesale transformation of the carbon intensive economy, saying that has to happen now. we're not preparing for future generations. the climate crisis is with us. right now, but i can tell you some developing countries are a little skeptical that those very strong words are going to be matched by action, because they've heard all of these words before. they've heard words, for example, back in paris, and particularly the commitment of a $100000000000.00 every year from the developing developed countries to the developing world. that was commitment 1st made in 2009. it was supposed to stop that annual payment in 2020 and it hasn't happened now. they're talking about 2023 . and i think that the tension between the developing and develop world is one of those tensions that you will have below the surface. now, as this conference moves to slightly different phase, the leaders have done that bit. they've started events, they've given it a boost at the beginning. now it's the hard, detailed technical negotiations

the us treasury secretary janet yellow and she said they should be a wholesale transformation of the carbon intensive global economy. it sounds very good. then you speak to some of the developing economists. and they're a little bit skeptical about all of this because they say they've heard similar things in the past. they heard them during the paris conference. remember the important pledge that was made in 2009, the figure a $100000000000.00 to go from the developed world to the developing world to help those developing countries to help them deal with the effects of climate change to help them transform their economies to green economies, while that money that they announced in 2009 was supposed to start flowing that $100000000.00 a year in 2020. and it hasn't happened. they've got no one year under 1000000000. and we're now told that 2023 is the target. and i think that i think signals one of the, one of the tension points in the summit, which now moves to a new phase because the global leaders, most of them are leaving now. and it's that very detailed technical negotiations in n

not sure it will help with that, but treasury secretary janet yellow and said recently that such a move is under consideration. so here's the question for you. would removing tariffs actually impact prices prob, probably not as greatly as one would imagine. the 1st reason being that a significant portion of the tariff cost, which would have been ordinarily passed through to us consumers was actually absorbed by the chinese manufacturers and supply chain through greater efficiencies and production. so paradoxically, the tariffs have the effect of forcing greater productivity and chinese manufacturing, a sort of counter intuitive result. so the, the tower of student flow through, in their entirety to the u. s. consumer. and as a result, if they were withdrawn, it would not have a significant impact. we need to distinguish, however, between the trump impose tariffs, which were on top of the existing base of tariffs and the, the existing base of tariffs do differentiate significantly between one type of product or one class of goods and another. so overall i would say though, the answer to

she said janet yellow than midst the net 0 grand reset. price tag will be a $150.00 trillion dollars, which was how 0 hedge tweeted about it. they covered it. the exact quote janet yon said was, quote, is a global transition for which we have an estimated price tag. some have put the global figure between a 100 and a 150 trillion over the next 3 decades. 0 hedge then a few days later, max, they quoted, they have a piece from eric peters who is a c i o of one river asset management. he's a hedge fund manager. so hedge fund c i o, once you say a $150.00 trillion dollars a few time, james, it honestly doesn't seem so big, says she at 1st said her statement said a 100 to a 150 trillion her following paragraph. this is how you shift the overton window. these programs are exciting, she said. but as big as the public sector effort is across all our countries, the 100 trillion dollar plus price tag to address climate change globally is far bigger. and you see the cost already appeared rather smaller. so 1st she said 100150 trillion. then the next s