method dispute what happened to the big diamond but let the authorities investigate but it's not a jarman of justice the united states department of justice traces. that money to the purchase of that pink diamond pendant and they have conversations between the jeweler your wife joel clearly. giving evidence that he bought your wife a twenty six seven million dollar a big diamond with one indeed money you know as far as i'm concerned when it was presented initially to me it was presented as a gift from months ok if i knew it was coming from one money i wouldn't accept it at all but mr g. who would know where it came from who paid for it you know we would have given that your annual official income is less than seventy thousand dollars a year were you not concerned that this was going to look really bad. there's a culture in the beliefs that expensive presents are given but twenty seven million dollars you wouldn't bet you we didn't know the value of the money ok or the present and i can tell you what your wife didn't know if i knew of it because she'd been with joe no to the jeweler and an

it so best method dispute what happened to the big letter thought this investigate let's not get jarman of justice the united states department of justice traces. that money to the purchase of that pink diamond pendant and they have conversations between the jeweler your wife joel clearly. giving evidence that he bought your wife a twenty six seven million dollar a pink diamond with one indeed money you know as far as i'm concerned when it was presented initially to me it was presented as a gift from months ok if i knew it was coming from one money i wouldn't accept it at all but mr who would know where it came from who paid for it you know we would have given that your annual official income is less than seventy thousand dollars a year were you not concerned that this was going to look really bad. there's a culture in the beliefs that expensive presents are given but twenty seven million dollars human we did an order of the money ok or the president and i can tell you what your wife or even know if i knew of it because she'd been with joe no to the jeweler and and looked at this tried

joining us now is ben jarman. away this point of having fundamental disagreements. it does not tell us there is much of a circuit breaker. ben: no, there is not. of revisions in terms of tariffs does seem inevitable. u.s. will end up terror thing all chinese imports. we push that through our forecasts and it does mean we will be needing to see more of a policy response in china to offset the drags we expect to come through channels. .eidi: we did see the policy that did not manage to support sentiment in the markets. do you expect to see more aggressive intervention on the fx side? we do expect to see people here. that they come earlier. it was more forceful than we thought. we expect on top of that, points nextasis year. locale already seeing government body issuance ramp-up. a devaluation in the yuan another 8%. china's rest property sector was a bright spot when we had this instability. we are seeing protests erupt because property prices seem to have fallen too much. emanaterld the risks from -- where will the risks emanate from? going through this year, real es

roundtable, ron jarman told the committee that there was no evidence that household income would prove to have a better income on response rates. i understand the citizenship question is a controversial issue and reasonable people can come to different conclusions. i would like to emphasize that dr. dillingham was not at the census bureau when this decision was made. even confirmed, dr. dillingham will not have the ability to change this decision because congress charge the secretary of commerce with the authority to determine the census content. this is one of the powers congress has delegated to the administration. this is well within their jurisdiction to create this question and determine what it is. there is an ongoing court case to determine if secretary ross acting in his authority. rather than argue about an issue that will be fully litigated in the courts, it is my hope that this hearing will focus on whether or not dr. dillingham is qualified to lead the census bureau. have beenues and i asking for the president to nominate a qualified individual to serve as director since th