. >> i am jason anderson, and we have sent you a letter regarding this project. there are a lot of different details to this project. we support the concept but i want to focus on the affordable housing. we talk about how we are cautiously in support of the project because we feel strongly that there should be inclusionary housing mixed into the market-rate developments, not in a separate building. we understand that right now, the city policy and law is that the developer can choose to do this option. we understand we cannot ask you to force them to do the on- site, but we have bulleted three ideas, that we would like to see you -- maybe encourage the developer into putting in writing. the first is that there is distrust on legislation that is going to go to the voters in november and the possibility there -- we have spoken to the developer, that with a 12-% inclusion in, rather than 15%, this could be attractive to them and they could look at doing this. it is important to have this on- site, rather than segregated and separate housing, for the low- income. the

and i think the implication was very clear there, anderson? >> jason and sarah, stick around. i want to bring in the panel. mark, what do you make of this? do you find the timing of it suspicious at all and does it make sense to you why they would not have mentioned this during the trial? >> well, obviously i think the timing is incredibly suspicious. they wait until the jury is out, the day the jury gets out and al of a sudden there is a press release basically, for lack of a better term, that's exactly what it was, and clearly they have this person who is under oath already in front of a grand jury, who's been presumably given statements to the police, who do you think orchestrated this in order to have it come out on the day the jury goes out to deliberate? i find it suspicious. and i also don't know that this judge would have ever let him testify in their case in chief. maybe as rebuttal as if sandusky had taken the stand, but not in their case in chief. >> but you're saying why would it be released the day the jury went out if they wanted to impact the trial somehow, are

anderson? >> and jason, we're waiting to speak with jerry sandusky's cocouncil and also tom klein for victim number five. was there ever any talk of a plea deal? do we know if defense or prosecutors tried to enter into plea discussions. >> i can tell you that was brought up a number of times. the idea of taking a plea. joe amendola had suggested to jerry sandusky early on that this might be the way to go. and i can also tell you that when this whole sort of news sort of wrinkle in the story with matt sandusky his adopted son, came into play, you have to wobder what kind of discussions were happening. of course it was too late. it was discussed not once, not twice but numerous times. joe amendola told me whenever he brought the subject up, jerry sandusky said i'm innocent, i want to fight this. i want to go to court and fight these charges. so ultimately a defense attorney has to do what his client wants him to do. >> mark geragos, as a defense attorney, what is it like having a conversation with a client where you want them to take a plea and they seem unwilling to enter into that decision. >> my f

anderson. how are you? >> i'm good. to jason'sion, did jerry sandusky say anything to you after the verdict was read? >> no, he really didn't. he looked at me and obviously he was distraught and disappointed but he didn't say anything verbally. >> what happens to him now? we saw him being led out in handcuffs, put in a police car, he goes off to i guess a jail. we're told that sentencing will be any time within 90 days. what do you do tomorrow? what is the next process? >> well, tomorrow i gather my wits and we start thinking about sentencing because that's the next step and start planning our appeal issues. we'll have to get a transcript of the trial and then we'll decide how we're going to proceed after sentencing. the sentencing probably will take place in september. you said and i talked to one of your co-counsels that there were a number of issues on appeal that you may have some sort of a case for. but no matter what you used to appeal, i mean, do you really believe you have enough that could actually overturn 45 counts agai

anderson. how are you? >> i'm good. to jason'sn, did jerry sandusky say anything to you after the verdict was read? >> no, he really didn't. he looked at me and obviously he was distraught and disappointed but he didn't say anything verbally. >> what happens to him now? we saw him being led out in handcuffs, put in a police car, he goes off to i guess a jail. we're told that sentencing will be any time within 90 days. what do you do tomorrow? what is the next process? >> well, tomorrow i gather my wits and we start thinking about sentencing because that's the next step and start planning our appeal issues. we'll have to get a transcript of the trial and then we'll decide how we're going to proceed after sentencing. the sentencing probably will take place in september. you said and i talked to one of your co-counsels that there were a number of issues on appeal that you may have some sort of a case for. but no matter what you used to appeal, i mean, do you really believe you have enough that could actually overturn 45 counts agains

jason schwartzman. >> he teams up director wes anderson's new film "moon rise kingdom" opened to enormous praise.me. >> thank you for having me. >> first of alling anything wes anderson does seems to get lots of good attention. >> well, i'm happy that you say that. you know, this movie has gotten a really good response. i'm happy for wes because he works so hard on the movies. write them for a very long time, makes them for a very long time. so, when they're received and you get a positive feedback, it's so good for him. >> when he does that, do you expect a call from him when he comes up for a new idea with a movie? >> not at all. >> you guys have history, so don't you expect a call? >> i expect nothing. i expect nothing. we have a great -- you know, we met on "rushmore," the first time i ever acted. we met -- we made the film together. you know, we became best friends. and i love him very dearly. we have a relationship that's totally separate, you know, i think from movies and such. but when we get to work together, it's an incredible thing. i'm very honored to do it, but i don't expect it. >>

our jason carroll was in the courtroom and spoke to anderson cooper about sandusky's demeanor. >> heund. at one point during the jury proceeding he basically said what did you guys do to deserve me. he said that to two of the jury pool reporters there. and said to the two reporters how did you guys get stuck with is. a little bit of joking there. as he left the courthouse today people were shouting out questions to him he said absolutely nothing and drove away. >> sandusky has pleaded not guilty to charges he sexually abused boys. >>> a window seat is going to cost you extra. some airlines are charging $29 each way on domestic flights and 59 bucks on international ones. the charge for what is being called preferred seating follows recent fees from everything from checked bags to blankets. >>> in sports i'll have another's bid for the triple crown goes on for saturday. the workers reached a tentative labor deal. >>> and your senior high school prank may have involved stealing door knobs or toilet papering trees. that wasn't enough for a group of students in connecticut who police say

jason. what moments stood out to you? >> well, one of the moments that you mentioned, anderson, is when accuser number four took the stand. jerry sandusky himself leaned forward and never took his eyes off this young man. he's 28 years old. and he described this pattern that prosecutors have been talking about all along. he talked about how he met jerry sandusky through a second mile type of event. he says that then led to befriending him, which led to gifts, things such as skateboards and golf clubs, hockey sticks, things like that. then he said it led to intimate contact in the showers with soap fights. then that led to wrestling. he says that led to oral sex. it was incredibly dramatic to hear this type of testimony happening in court. i also should point out one of the first visual cues that jurors got that they really seemed to pay attention to, anderson, was when prosecutors put up the pictures of all of these accusers on the screen. they put pictures up when they were 12 or 13 years old. it was just a way to remind jurors what they're going to be hearing from are young adults. what they're going to be testifying ab

jason carroll was in the courtroom when the verdict was read. here is how he described it to andersonilty verdict started to be read one after another, anderson. jerry sandusky looked straight ahead. he remained absolutely without emotion. >> after the verdict, the judge revoked his bail and ordered his arrest. joining me now is holly hughes to talk about this. good morning to you. >> good morning. >> any surprises here? it took 21 hours. >> right. it's about a half hour each charge. he was looking at 48 counts. 21 hours, break it down that way. bear in mind, they acquitted him on three charges. they spent more time arguing about those three. this was a very fast verdict. >> an awfully quick trial. what does that tell us about them and the case the prosecution put on? >> they had one wonderful thing going for it. that was the amount of witnesses, survivors who were going to take the stand and say that happened to me. the defense couldn't turn it around and paint it as this was one or two people looking to make a buck. civilly, they can sue him. we saw those accusations and other high

jason carroll joins me now. do we know why sandusky didn't testify today? >> well, it's a good question, anderson. can tell you this, a source close to the case that i spoke to late yesterday afternoon and late last night tells me that, the idea of testifying or not testifying was still very much in play, still under discussion up until late last night. i'm also told that the final decision came down to two people -- joe amendola and jerry sandusky. you have to wonder if this whole idea of risk came into the equation. remember, sandusky gave two interviews to the media in the past. those interviews did not go well. and you have to wonder if attorneys were telling him or wondering what kind of risk would present itself if he were to take the stand under cross-examination. anderson? >> given that interview with costas, who knows what he would have said on the stand. it would have been incredible to listen to. what's next in terms of closing arguments tomorrow? >> i think what we can expect is look for each side to revisit some of the points they were bringing up during the trial. for the prosecution

jason carroll at the courthouse with more. today we're hearing new information that sandusky may have actually threatened one of the victims. >> and that's what we're hearing, anderson, from the young man identified as victim number 10. he said in 1998, jerry sandusky sexually assaulted him in the sandusky home in the basement. saying he forced him to perform oral sex on him. he said, quote, he told me if i told on him he would never see my family again. he apologized for saying that. he said that he didn't mean it and that he loved me. another reason why this young man is interesting, the defense is saying a lot of these young men are trying to come forward and cash in in some way hiring attorneys to pursue some sort of a civil case. this is one young man who has not hired a private attorney. he said he is coming forward because he said, quote, it was at right thing to do. >> perhaps the most emotional testimony came from victim number five who said sandusky assaulted him in the shower. >> he said this happened when he was 12 or 13 years old. it was one of the most emotional moments of the day without a question. he described it this way. once he was in the shower,

jason carroll is outside the courthouse. we heard from three alleged victims today. really, the most graphic testimony, some of the most serious charges, come from the man identified as victim number nine. >> that's correct, anderson. he's 18 years old, recently graduated from high school. he told a very disturbing story of how he says jerry sandusky sexually assaulted him over a period of three years in the basement of jerry sandusky's home. saying he forced him to have oral sex and that he repeatedly sodomized him. it was very difficult testimony as he told the court, quote, he came into the room, pulled his pants down, laid on top of me and kind of forced it in. at that moment, as i looked to my left, his mother was sitting just beside me. she gripped the bench. she put her head in her hands as her son went on to say, then he got real aggressive and just forced me into it. and i just went with it. there was no fighting against it. and anderson, at the conclusion of his testimony, prosecutors asked this young man to point out jerry sandusky in the courtroom. he couldn't even look at him. he just said, he's the one sitting right over there. >> for the first time, jason, we're starting to get a sense of what the d