we have the president and his attorney, jay secula. they're rightly claiming this person did not act alone. in fact, jay secula believes a law firm drafted that complaint. certainly looks like it to me. doesn't look like a whistleblower. but also one question today is, well, "the new york times" report, former cia back to the cia? oh, do we have spies again within our own government spying on the president of the united states? abusing the powerful tools of intelligence we give them, we entrusted them to keep us safe. regardless of who wrote the complaint, the claims were bogus, there's no quid pro quo. zip, you can read it yourself, not the made up version. no misconduct. nothing, the only person involve in a quid pro quo if you want to say so, that would be, yeah, joe 30330 and his son with no qualifications. when it comes to ukraine, no experience. energy, oil, gas, no experience. he makes millions. and he made billions in china. same thing. no -- no background experience in private equity, banking, none whatsoever. that we can find