' position as a national security challenge to his country, but he doesn't discuss jaydivens' views onituation on the us-mexico border, right? he is talking about ukraine. why, from the point of view of linzi graham, this is interference in elections. therefore, a very simple question arises here: what should you not do, so as not to dissolve them. to wire, i.e. where can you think of at this election time so that they think that you are not wireting them, maybe you are annoying them by the very fact of your existence, well, that is, if to take it as an axiom that the problem is not in zelensky and not in his behavior and not in the protocol and not in the way he goes somewhere, and not to look for any unprofessional moments in the activities of the ukrainian delegation there or in the statements of our own president, even if we can find them, we can sit there and find and... offer our help to speaker johnson, and if we still agree that this is not a reason, but an excuse, that just before trump's election campaign is built on the idea that he is the president of peace, and harris will

why exactly, when zelensky in the new yorker magazine talks about his attitude to jaydivens' position. which is a national security challenge to his country, he does not discuss jd vance's views on the us-mexico border situation, truth? he is talking about ukraine. why from linzi's point of view? the topic is interference in the elections, so there is a very simple question: what should you not do in order not to inflate them, i.e., what are you going to do at this time of the election so that they think that you are not annoying them, maybe you are annoying them yourself by the fact of its existence, well, that is, if we still take it as an axiom that the problem is not in zelensky and not in his behavior and not in the protocol and not in the way he goes somewhere, and not to look for any no'. activities of the ukrainian delegation there or in statements our own president, even if we can find them, we can sit there and find them and offer our help to speaker johnson, and if we still agree that this is not a reason but an excuse, that it's just that trump's election campaign is built

environment, and donald trump understands that this environment needs to be talked to and maybe jaydivens is the person who appeals to this environment at the beginning before the elections. and before the election itself, but everything that jedi wen says, it does not mean that these ideas are shared by donald trump, and that he will somehow implement them. i also watched the general's interview mcmaster, he was donald trump's national security adviser when he was president on national security issues, he says this, he directly said: jd vance's plan is a plan to make ukraine a vassal of russia, so what? americans say in general, what the survey says, how, how this plan, how these ideas of vance are perceived by americans? so there's actually a split among republicans, one of the polls that was done in january of this year shows that those republicans who support donald trump, they're significant, they're for the termination of aid to ukraine, and the rest of the republicans, on the contrary, they are divided in half, approximately split in half. in terms of supporting ukraine, so, again,