making false statements by suggesting the estimated capacity at about 60,000, that is what the , jayman said, and i quote carney is being picked desk hate to say things that are not so but in this case, the people who knew the facts and had to know the facts, and the facts were from documents we received from lead contractors that slow down to a non-acceptable level at 1100 users. in fact, todd was telling us at 60,000 was the target and at 250,000, they just could not handle it. thate basis for allegation, the chairman quoted from a testing document he released, which says this. ran performance testing , working with cgi to bee the ffm environment to able to handle a maximum load. reachtly, we are able to 1100 users before response time gets too high. mr. chow, it is my understanding wasimp one the environment only a sample testing environment, and not a test of the full production capacity of the entire website. am i correct? >> the time has expired. the gentleman may answer. quest you are correct. limitation one the environment is about 10% the size of the full production environment