it is not the jcp oa, or the jcp 08 and war. when that war comes the consequences will be much more devastating. what do we do? we have talked about the rollback shattered she recently. it is an incredibly difficult problem. , iery worried about syria have no good answers, but i think the trump administration inherited the mess, but i am not sure i see the way forward on these deals with the russians as the iranians continue to push forward in establishing this language. moremore enthusiastic, and job mikeabout the pompeo is doing at the cia. i see embolden cia with the necessary resources and to movel backings aggressively against these networks. regional approach an approach targeting networks -- we talked a lot about money issues. clearly you will not be able to do anything about the iranian threat, lsu drained them of their resources and the jcp oa, as jim says has given only one hundred billion dollars in cash by has opened up the global financial system and opened up opportunities on industrial economyd a rainy and a in 20

the jcp oa is a case in point. of twol is the outcome years of intensive multilateral , overwhelmingly applauded by the international community, and endorsed by the as a part ofcil resolution 2231. as such, it belongs to the international community in its entirety, not only to one or two countries. the jcpl.a. can become a new -- jcpoa can be a new model for interactions. we have opened our doors to engagement and cooperation. ofhave concluded scores development agreements with advanced countries of both east and west. unfortunately, some deprive themselves of this unique opportunity. they have imposed sanctions really against themselves. and now they feel betrayed. deceased nor did we cheat or deceive anyone. determined thees extent of our nuclear program. we never sought to achieve deterrence through nuclear weapons. ourselvesmunized through our knowledge, and more importantly, the resilience of our people. this is our talent and our approach. some have claimed to have wanted to deprive iran of nuclear weapons, w

that has nothing to do with the jcp oa or the iran deal. that's u.s. law, and u.s. law requires the president every 90 days to decide whether the iran deal and other elements of the u.n. resolution, which would include ballistic missile testing and arms smuggling and support of terrorism, it asks the president to look at all of those things. if he still thinks the deal is in the best interest of the united states, then he certifies. if he thinks that the deal -- that the situation is not the best interest of the american public, then he doesn't certify. at that point, it goes to congress. he works with congress on how to reshape the situation. but the iran deal and u.s. law are two different things. he's saying that he could decertify without withdrawing from the deal. ambassador haley: that's right. aat i will tell you, from u.n. perspective, what you will hear us very vocal on is the fact that the resolution in place basically wrapped in with the nuclear deal. it said if iran did any of these things, it would be in violation. since then, the secretary-general has