in the united nations -- tell me jeane kirkpatrick was not constitutional? she stared down tyrants small and large. that was a constitutional.and doing god's work at the united nations. what else can we say? i could talk more, could reminds that it was in marbury vs. madison, john marshall, questions in their nature, political, or by the constitution and the laws submitted to the executive can never be made by this court. the president has certain discretionary powers for which he is, quote accountable only to his country, in his political character and to his own conscience. that is constitutional. that is what it means to have a president, another case for your -- the court rejected the challenge of the congressional delegation lawsuits against president jimmy carter's decision to terminate the defense treaty with taiwan without going hat in hand to the house and senate. associate justice william rehnquist wrote, the constitution is expressed as to the manner in which the senate shall participate in the ratification of a treaty it is silent as to that body

. >> not like jeane kirkpatrick that she went to dinner at the embassy the night of the invasion. >> is she thought she had to vote in the british way. then after she already voted that she should abstain and she made another speech she would rather abstained so write-up to the end she did not want to the thatcher view of. >> it was tough when it was pro-british. >> the navy secretary had the british point of view and that shares the strength of that relationship because it is that military and intelligence at its closest and to in terms of the atlantic alliance it is much more important than relations. >> with 250 troops killed it was small and a significant parts of the british establishments listed stature prevails. >> guest: that's right. she had no experience with for at also she did not know what to do. she know what she wanted to she had to be given validation that it could be done. she had no idea and she said how long? he said three weeks and she said shirley yu mien three days. she did not note the logistics'. but that gave the feeling that it is at least possible. i do bel

nobody going to stand here and that jean kirkpatrick was not constitutional. she stared down tyrant small and large. a constitutional appointment. work at thed's united nations. what else can we say? talk more about justisiability. i could remind that it was in marbury versus madison that john informed thatt questions in their nature, political, or which are by the constitution and the laws, submitted to the executive, can this court.e by the president has certain for whichary powers he is "accountable only to his political his character and to his own conscience." and that's more than justisiability. that's constitutional. aat's what it means to have president. another case just for your water v carter. the court rejected challenge of a congressional delegation of a presidentainst carter's determination to terminate with taiwan. an associate justice, william here, why thete, constitution is express as to the manner in which the senate shall participate in the ratification of a treaty, it is silent as to that body's abrogationon in the of a treaty. similarly w