jeannine: so this is a citron honey tea.etness, which brings you to the honey. monica: mnh-mnh. it's not my favorite. jeannine: okay. monica: honey -- mnh. because it can smell a little bit like bad foot odor. jeannine: okay, now we go into more of a fruity citrus. fruits and citruses, again, is a consumer favorite. jessica: see, i like that. monica: i don't like it at all. [ laughter ] lemonis: juli and chloe, you guys have done a lot in the last couple weeks with agilex, working on the packaging. why don't we go through the colors, just to see how the packaging in the boards works? chloe: for the packaging, jess created a pattern. and i think it would be really awesome for every line to have its own unique pattern. so we could have a lavender line, we could have a buckthorn, based on the different flavors. lemonis: yeah. nice job, jess. christie: i'm totally digging the label. the label's dead-on. chloe: this might be easier to see the pattern. it's really easy to show the different scents with the different colors. monica

>> the best four words every reporter dreams of hearing, jeannine, it's oprah winfrey. i think i said earlier, it's not oprah winfrey right now and she said, yes, it is. ♪ it's oprah >> did she do that? >> yes, she did. >> do that to people on the phone? >> i forgot i did that. >> amazing. >> i used to say "we'll be right back" so you know. ♪ it's oprah >> jeannine, it's so fascinating to me about the book. you have a little bit of hater-ade. people are drinking it. at first you said even you were worried you had no business writing this book. you felt compelled by unqualified. >> why? >> it is a migranted story. >> it is. >> in mexico. >> i always knew i wanted to write about immigration. and i resisted for a very long time telling the story from a migrant's point of view because i was worried i didn't know enough, that my privilege would make me define certain truths. >> what convinced you that you could write it? >> i felt very compelled. it was five years of research and two failed drafts that convinced me i needed to go into lydia's point of view. there was a point

judge jeannine: client. let's talk about now, china deal. i understand phase one requires china divide an additional $40 million in agricultural products from what they are buying already. they were talking about this because pelosi is going on with this nonsense is now in the senate. >> we are talking about it and i think history will not look kindly on the instigators in the investigators of this. and will reward those beginning with president trump. who actually showed courage and boldness in transforming our economy in a relationship with the world news second-largest becoming china. a quick review, we had actually in dollar trade deficit with china. every year. the reversing technology instilling technology. in the total amount of goods and services that china will not bite under the agreement, is 200 billion. 40 billion is aquaculture. and this is fully enforceable and there's a 90 day. whether they're satisfied with the way things are doing and going. i think most importantly is the way to present trump approach this deal. in his team

( as husband ) "honey, i swear to god, i never slept with jeannine!e that monogamy is for penguins?" ( laughter ) but eye don't hear morgan freeman narrating our sex. but that would be nice." but the ukraine scandal wasn't the only bombshell in bolton's upcoming book. it turns out bolton was concerned that trump did favors for autocratic leaders. just concerned? that's it? it's like your doctor saying, "all right, your blood pressure is normal. i am concerned about this arrow sticking out of your heart. i would take it out, but i'm going to wait until i finish writing my book about it." trump isn't the only one john bolton implicates in his book. he also names secretary of state and angry baby bird, mike pompeo. but pompeo can make himself look guilty all on his own. listen to how testy he got during an interview with npr's mary louise kelly for "all things considered." >> change of subject, ukraine. do you owe ambassador marie yovanovitch an apology? >> you know, i agreed to come on your show today to talk about iran. that's what i intend to do. >> i

. >> so you're talking about judge judy, maybe judge jeannine given the political climate that we're in or the chief justice of them all john roberts presiding over the process. a lot of people trying to understand what role he will play and the judge isn't the one who sets the rules for the trial that he'll be proesiding over. and he's traded barbs with the president in the past. so people will eye the way he tries to handle this circumstance. >> and constitutional law experts really are divided about exactly what he's going to do. he could be a wild card. while the good money is on that he'll throw everything to a vote. he has every right to make a ruling on witnesses and then those 51 senators would be faced with with with overruling a conservative justice of the supreme court and i think that is a very difficult position. to put those senators in. so it is possible that he could just say, look, this is not controversial, folks. trials have witnesses. these witnesses, john bolton, mick mulvaney, are material to the question of why president trump withheld this aid and then the vul

we are joined now by jeannine zakaria, former jerusalem bureau chief and middle east correspondent forhe washington post," who these days wisely teaches journalism at stanford university in the great state of california. jeanine, where do your thoughts go given your life's work and experience in the region on a night when you hear of a volley of ballistic missiles from iran, headed to u.s. targets in iraq? >> well, it's obviously very anxiety provoking day, brian, but let me say two things. president trump is trying to establish some deterrence with iran after the provocations that we saw once he with drew from the nuclear deal, when we saw the attacks on the saudi oil fields that were unanswered. he went in this way that nobody expected in killing qassem soleimani, but he doesn't want a war with iran. likewise now the iranians want to have retaliation. they want retribution, but they don't want a war with the united states. so if there's any comfort there, it's we both -- the united states and iran don't want to go to war. so how do we square those two things? i think that the iranian