let me start with you, if i may jeff ashton, as a former prosecutor, did they have a point there? what did you make of what they were saying? >> well, i don't really agree with at least the last commentator. it is not an usual at all for a witness -- the cross examination of a witness to be limited based on what's asked in direct. that happens every day in the courtrooms i've been in. i was not surprised judge lester did not allow free rein. i felt that this hearing was handled as i expected. i didn't expect them to present a whole lot of evidence. i expected them to present the affidavit. to correct one of the judges who just spoke, the defense called the investigator, not the prosecutor. the defense seemed very prepared to cross examine the investigator about what he said in the affidavit and why. i thought that was done very well. i felt the prosecution in this case planned on presenting as little as they needed to in order to have the arthur hearing. so i did not -- i don't agree with the last two commentators that this was somehow done incompetently. >> roy black, you've been