is that we build up our successful proposition c housing bonds and i think the majors advisor, jeff buckley, and his staff. to thank them for their hard work but i know we need to do much more. i also want to say i'm in agreement with supervisor yee to look more specifically at the size of units that working families have units that are big enough. i support workforce housing and middle income people to have parts of housing bonds, but i dislike when it's paired against housing that is for our most vulnerable and lowest income people. that's what i say we need much more. the last point i want to make is gauche and i probably sound like a broken record, gauche but i know is that baby boomers turning to seniors that were trying to do her best to be an aging friendly city i'm just wondering, what percentages, what kinds of housing are we doing within our bigger bonds that are really looking at seniors. but we've done the budget analyst reports and analysis on housing needs of seniors, and showing that the population is going to boom so it'll be one third of our city, people over 60 or 65. many

i want to thank jeff buckley for keeping my office well informed about the bond as it moves forward good i have some concerns when where increasing the ami percentage for middle income, and i potentially hit lower income renters or lower income people against -- but i clearly agreed there's a need for middle income bands or our approach to prevent displacement or help house people. could you give us more of a sense does i think he said the vast majority would be up to 120% ami and when you look at larger families, you would probably go to 150. i'm wondering, what are the percentages are looking at how can we ensure that there's equity built in to our process to look at our building this new middle income rental program? >> resident vast majority of the funds would be used for households at 121 below, that's because all of our low income housing that's financed with tax credits is capped at 60% of area median income. anything over that doesn't qualify for tax credits. so, you can leverage those funds. that's really the bulk of our low income housing. surly, public housing. we have 80 mill