jeff kazinsky will talk about this in greater detail in his presentation that follows on behalf of the project sponsor. the project will replace 146-space parking lot on the site. the use of the spaces is likely to have generated traffic in the past and this project would mean less daily traffic. appellants raise add ne raised e and parking is not considered a significant impact under se albuquerque ua. q auction. ua. it would be required to comply with the noise ordinance, the dust control ordinance, public work's standard construction measures and these would be implemented for the project. the appellant's claim that the ordinances would not be followed is spec co speculative. the second topic is the purpose and intent of the design process and waterfront design committee as provided in san francisco planning code section 240. the port has provided a memo that addresses this topic. to som summarize, the foundatiof the review process is the 1997 land use plan, specifically the companion document, the waterfront design and access element. the element contains urban design, architectura