official jeff lee clark in contempt. that's next. stay with us.y with us mobile app so you can quickly check the markets? yeah, actually i'm taking one last look at my dashboard before we board. excellent. and you have thinkorswim mobile- -so i can finish analyzing the risk on this position. you two are all set. have a great flight. thanks. we'll see ya. ah, they're getting so smart. choose the app that fits your investing style. ♪♪ ♪ limu emu... & doug ♪ ♪ superpowers from a spider bite? i could use some help showing the world how liberty mutual customizes their car insurance so they only pay for what they need. (gasps) ♪ did it work? only pay for what you need ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ spider-man no way home in theaters december 17th wondering what actually goes into your multi-vitamin. ♪ libeat new chapter.iberty. liberty. ♪ its innovation organic ingredients and fermentation. fermentation? yes, formulated to help your body really truly absorb the natural goodness. new chapter. wellness well done. nurse mariyam sabo knows a moment

jeff lee clark did so earlier this week.st as reported by friends at politico. it is an eyebrow raising move here. as chairman thompson laid out earlier this week in the contempt report that we had on capitol hill, it could be a way for these witnesses, these people that the committee are interested in asking questions about their involvements as it rets to the january 6th insurrection as a means of simply delaying the inevitable, which is being held in criminal contempt. or it means they could be looking for a way to provide the committee with new information so long as they get immunity. jamie raskin told us that it is quite possible that jeffrey clark who has one more opportunity to appear before the committee community -- they could grant him immunity use which means in a question-by-question basis jeff ree clark, the former d.o.j. official who worked with the former president in his capacity at the department of justice could decide, if he decides to plead the fifth for a specific question then the committee can decide,

certainly jeff lee clark should be scrutinized whether it is legal or illegal on a d.o.j.terhead where your job is paid by the u.s. taxpayer to want a letter sent to georgia to overturn an election they recounted three times as republicans top to bottom in that state. surely there are questions about the other people around the expresident. where do you think the line should be drawn? >> well, look, i think if anybody read -- i know we all did -- that stunning piece in the atlantic last week that this was really maybe just a dress rehearsal. i don't want to get to the point where it works. and therefore, that means that, from top to bottom, there has to be accountability. and i -- again, i think the pattern people expect it. and i just don't see how we go through another election cycle with the prospect that others are planning over the course of the next couple of years to figure out a way to completely undermine the election, whether that's in the states or it is again storming the capital. so, you know, i worry that there is going to be a message sent that you just can

. >> for all of our cast gagss of jeff lee clark as the coup plotter within the coup plot over at the fbi seeking to topple jeffrey rosen, the person who sort of discovered him, his state sponsor is meadows. the report says meadows reportedly introduced trump to d.o.j. official jeffrey clark. clark went on to recommend that he be installed as acting attorney general and that d.o.j. should send a letter to state officials urging them to take certain actions that could affect the outcome of the november 2020 election by, among other things, appointing alternate slaifts electors to cast electoral votes for trump rather than president biden. so when we talk about the d.o.j. sort of parallel track that ran parallel to mr. rosen and mr. donahue, who were on the phone with trump receiving orders to declare the election corrupt, meadows was running the clark operation at d.o.j., it would appear. >> meadows was doing everything. and, you know, nicolle, i think this is a moment where we need to step back and make sure people understand who mark meadows was at this time. you worked in the white

so they are trying to show that jeff lee clark here -- that they are not on some sort of crazy partisansion, that they are not just trying to throw people in jail. they are really trying to get to the facts of what happened. so jeffrey clark's obstructionism is more on line with one other person, steve bannon, this is the argument from raskin, that's what they are trying to show there, they are not being unreasonable, they are trying to show how seriously and soberly they are conducting this investigation. >> a, i am still sort of carrying around my baggage from the last four years. i was listening for what the expresident might have heard in there. i think it's this part. we anticipate next year we will be conducting multiple weeks of public hearings, setting out for the american people in vivid color exactly what happened every minute of the day on january 6th here at the capitol and at the white house and what led to that violent attack. that's going to take place you know where -- on live tv. that's going to take place in roadblock coverage, the kind thing that triggers the expresid