at the same thing that got us here now, jeffrey dahmer was killed in prison and they took that and waged a political war and they did it out of fear. when i started to realize that, i became interested in the prison system. so i had the ignorance of believing that these people were just making choices and that wasn't the case and what i also realized was there's a difference between reading and what you'reg reading. some who were pleading guilty just simply didn't understand. there was one called manufacturing a weapon. especially for black men because they would take the razor and break off the tip. men were pleading guilty to this manufacturing a weapon so i started to tell them stop pleading guilty to that. so i started and all of a sudden they are accusing me of stuff that made no sense. suddenly from the wisconsin innocence project there were students assigned and so as stuff was going on you could see what was going on and essentially people stopped pleading guilty to these and started doing little and couldn't fill up the bed space in the unit so just think about it, this is segre

jeffrey dahmer was killed in prison and they took it and arranged to get a budget to both the present and they did out of fear the same they got the criminal law that takes people out and sent people to prison, same thing. when i started to realize, i became a tutor in the prison system so i had to leave ignorance of believing they were just making choices, commit crime and come back but that wasn't thees case. i also realized, there's a difference between reading and understanding what you read. pleading guilty, they just simply didn't understand stuff like that. i'll give you one in particular, there was a call, manufacturing a weapon and you would get especially for black men because they would take the canteen, rip off the tape to get close shave because why? blackman's hair curls up and you get ingrown hairs so they were pleading guilty to the infarction of manufacturing a weapon though i started to tell them, stop pleading guilty to that. if there was no intent, you are saving with it so i started and all of a sudden i'm getting snatched, they are accusing me with stuff that mad

jeffrey dahmer was killed in prison and they took that and waged a political war to go get a budget to build more prisons. and they did it out of fear. the same way they got the criminal laws that tax people out and send people of color to prison for cracking, not people who have -- the same thing. so when i started to realize that i became hscd tutor in the prison system. so i had the naive ignorance of believing that these people were making choices to commit crime and come back. that wasn't the case, right? and what i also realized was this. there is a difference between reading and understanding what you are reading. and i met so many men pleading guilty for rule infractions because they simply didn't understand the laws and stuff like that. i will give you one in particular. there was one call manufacturing a weapon, right. and you would get manufacturing of a weapon especially for black men because they would take the canteen razor, break off the tip to get a close shave. why? black men's hair curl up. men were pleading guilty to this rule infraction of manufacturing a weapon. so

. >> joe biden is perfect like andrew cuomo is the perfect gentleman and jeffrey dahmer has the perfecta little sharp there. >> it is a little accurate, stu. it is accurate. by gosh, joe biden perfect? our economy is tanking. his poll numbers are tanking. our borders are wide open. we've gone back to ridiculous things that mean we're no longer energy independent. we're now begging opec to -- stuart: it was a fund-raiser. i think it was a fund raiser or a holiday party to raise funds. you can expect that kind of thing. >> you have to have a tinge of honestly in it. for him to say get ready, pal, we'll win big in 2022. that is the kind of thing you say if you're about to get pummeled in the boxing ring. go out there do a little trash-talking. everybody in that room knows what he said is absolutely banana oil. there is no way that what he is saying he could believe. it is just impossible, stu. stuart: do you see that editorial, it is an op-ed in "the new york times" this morning, before stephens saying that the president should say that he is not running and should say it publicly. it was