jeffrey. you got to jeffrey jeffrey there's a lot of economists are saying there's not enough austerity you have to keep cutting cutting spending cut spending cut budgets cut cut cut cut i mean it's a remarkable looking at europe well. well there always these kinds of nine hundred thirty s. like dizzy with success stalinist who want to see more extreme measures imposed or camaro rouge types who just can't see enough destruction that their appetite is is growing only as they taste more blood and of course this is absurd we can't just keep opposing this austerity i mean what is the end game it is you can continue to keep cutting a wages as you continue to keep cutting the social sector and i'm not talking about protecting inefficiencies i'm all for introducing efficiencies but when you're actually reducing these costs then where does the demand in the economy come from and i would agree with peter we certainly do need to see some radical haircuts be imposed on finance but my concern is with the word reform remembering my friend boris calder lecky who once reported that every time the former soviet

written by jeffrey sachs. jeffrey sachs, good to have you on this program. we appreciate your insights. thanks for your time. >> thank you so much. tavis: thanks for watching. >> there is a saying that dr. >> there is a saying that dr. king had that said there is always the right time to do the right thing. i try to live my life every day by doing the right thing. we know that we are only halfway to completely eliminating hunger and we have work to do. walmart committed $2 billion to fighting hunger in the u.s. as we work together, we can stamp hunger out. >> and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. >> be

jeffrey dahmer. with jeffrey dahmer, it was not enough to kill. jeffrey wanted to incinerate, burn, destroy, melt body parts. remember, jeffrey dahmer bore -- would drill holes in his victims' skulls. he would put torsos in plastic buckets full of chemicals. so that the torsos would melt. he gathered the body parts so that he could have control over them and for his sexual satisfaction. so with this guy, i think you are seeing not just a pattern of homicide, but almost either cannibalism, a fetishizing of body parts, a perverse wish to have control over the body. and there may be more parts in that house. >> interesting that he is hoarding body parts. to the lawyers. sherman, brimner. mickey, another question is this. let me see mickey, please. mickey, i have seen offenders confess to a murder, but they will not confess to molesting a child. i mean the best we can pray for here, mickey, is that he knocked her out with some type of you know, knockout gas on a rag like he tried to do to the jogger. how can you explain all of jessica's little clothes neatly

(from monday, still remember the jeffrey maeir homerun."14:38:04 (from sunday) "jeffrey maeir stole ouucencc..((melinda tag)) 3 how are the roads looking tonig? tonight?brandi proctor has our traffic edge report. report. mapfiberbelairwilkensmap395map &, a wwman dying of ancer is humiliated by airport security. security. what she wassforced to do in ffonn of other passengers..... and the reeson she says her health was put attrisk. halloween is still weeks away... why hunnreds of zombies took to thh streets of england. 3 --adblib weather tz-- &p as a pastor, my support for question 6 is rooted in my belief that the government should treat everyone equally. i wouldn't want someone denying my rights based upon their religious views, so i shouldn't deny others based upon mine. it's about fairness. i support this law because it doesn't force any church to perform a same sex marriage if it's against their beliefs. and that's what this is about. protecting religious freedom and all marylanders equally under the law. join me in voting for question 6. so let me tell you what i know:k about quest

jeffrey maier. maier.llt's... octobee ninth,1996. tte playoffs... o's vs. yankees.../ derek jeter... hits a ball deep../ tony tarasco... ready to catch it.../ but... jeffrey maier... rracces out... from catches the baal instead...///. the... umpiies... call it... a... p homeerun...// even... though after sloww you... an see maierr.. inteefeee....// the... four games to one...../ and... the orioles... went... into a tailspinn./ to ...postseason play... until now. baltimore's ties... to thh - poes... baak... much farther.. than that series. series.meliinda roeder shoos us hoo those ties....go back to the beginning of the modernn err of baseball 3 (from sunday) 16:02:21 - nats of beeping at turnstiles(from sunday) 16:14:143 "post season sscre cards here!"(from sunddy) 16:22:10 "go oos, hon!" the orioles may not used to so much fanfare in october. but they are facing verr familiar foes.(from monday, roonie's stuff) 14:21:42 "readdthe sign, yo!! yankees fans flocked to theirrteam take on the birds. (from sunday) 15::4:27 it's a new season. this is derek jeter time, see."in many ways - it felt ike a meeting between old friends. reliving the good old days.14:17:29 "reminds me of the oriole magic of ears gone by. absolutely."the last time these teams met in the pould forget gameeone???? 16 years ago today... when a valuable player.interfering - with a catchable fll ball - --called a home run.(from 14:18:22 "i still remember the jeffreymeeun." 14:38:04 (from sundayy "jeffrey maeir ssole our innocence."(todaa)11:51:43 pthat's a story that willlgo down... the great blown caals offall time..baseball historians love to point out rivals.goong back more than a - centuuy. when half of the baltimore orioles eam was later become the yankees. (today) 11:48:40 "it's a semi compplx sory."standdp: and prony thht the most legenddry here in baltimore.(today) 11:47:21 "baltimoreans have always grappled with the museum sees a spike in ttendance whenever the yankkes ccme to town.but ironically... the babe's greatest record - for home runs hht in one season - ffll, or was at least tied - here in town too.by roger maris - who hht #59 agaannt the orioless ((oday) 1:49:32 "iits just &panother quirky link ttat brings us together with the yankees..there haae been from players...(todaa- 11:52 "one of thh great orioles of all time has been broadcasting yankees baseball managers.....(from monday) 14:42:00 "i know, of course, that showalter ..

jeffrey rosen, is hew/] dqg ? isisa pardinis. >> my name is jeffrey rosen and i am on the san francisco cab drivers association, i'mhe director on their board. been driving a cab 17 years. i'm not going to yell. there a no sense in it. we've been complaining. people are upset. we're enraged as cab drivers. you can tell. but who's listening. i don'tyofsñ know. it's crucial. we've been putting our labor into this, really. the other thing that's really important here, no more earned medallions, honor the waiting list. you're forcing our hand. we're enraged. there's no other choice we have other than to pursue legal action, most likely a ballot initiative. so let the courts, let the voters, because you're not listening. can hear that. thank you for your time. is mr. pardinis here? honorable officials? i don't think so. you are dishonoring the people you are working for and being paid by. if youi$dz)> have no common sen, continue. i don't want to mud sling. but you put yourself in a position where we feel the need to defend ourselves because you are dishonoring what is going on. be honorable, please. honor the contracts

reporting live, jeffrey schaub, cbs 5 and kcbs. >> thank you, jeffrey. you for that report. >>> all right. now a chance of showers and thunderstorms today. lawrence was talking about lightning. >> yeah. so was the chief there in richmond. what's going on? >> can't verifier the ones in richmond. i was talking to the folks at kcbs. we haven't seen lightning strikes there you about we have seen plenty at the coast. the half moon bay area getting pounded and the san jose area last night seeing some rain coming down. a welcome return of the rain that's fallen. they had a good downpour there. .09" of rain after 9:00 last night. and they may not be done yet. check out our high-def doppler radar. you can see some of that rainfall and automatic those lightning strikes showing up along -- all those lightning strikes showing up along the coastline. we are not done just yet. we could see more on the way although the rain line is going to be shifting further to the south. you can see some of that activity now towards los gatos. pretty good cells near blossom hill roa

jeffrey thanks so much for coming on great to be here so jeffrey a business roundtable just released a new poll that showed prop thirty seven as losing i mean i thought it had so much momentum at the beginning clearly in the lead how is it possible that nationwide polls show ninety percent of americans supporting jamma labeling but then this new poll saying that only thirty percent of california residents support this measure. well the problem is that the biotech industry is trying to confuse voters by telling them that labeling is confusing they're spending more money than ever spend on labeling telling people that labeling is too expensive they're pretending that the labeling bill has been created by trial lawyers to force lawsuits and that it's going to be bad for farmers and small businesses and it's going to cost a huge amount of money for california bureaucracy in reality all of these are manufactured lies and this is very simply a right to do we're label b. of six to eight a package indicating whether a product is genetically engineer. and some of the opponents of prop thirty seven jeffries say that the food choices will decrease and prices will increase how do you respond to that. there are sixty one countries that have labeling requirements for genetically engineered foods and not one has increased the cost of shoots to consumers in fact the same companies that sell g m o's in the united states craft nationally as hershey's and have either labeled it overseas or removed it entirely at no cost to consumers if they wanted to trust the entire cost of hiring an artist to place the actual label would cost about seventy three cents per person per year however the biotech industry claims that it's going to be four hundred dollars per year and that it's going to cost the california government over a billion what in fact according to the california government it's at most two point seven cents per person so what they're doing is they're trying to scare people away from voting for their best self-interest sure i mean the cost to california and consequential are reading the actual bill it's very little and also i mean if these biotech companies have to incur a one time cost to repackage their foods and pass and if they're going to pass all the costs on us that's just another reason to not support that jeffrey but as we know i mean monsanto already threatened to sue vermont the state that tried to pass labeling and then you have the lawsuits like of thousands of farmers that have sued monsanto here and the millions of brazilian farmers and brought in sued monsanto and the case was kind of dismissed i mean it seems like corporations are always coming out on top what legal recourse do we have if these states themselves are getting threatened by monsanto it was a shame that the. governor of vermont and the leaders in both in connecticut as well both refused to let the bills for labeling go through because of their fear of an. civil lawsuits are a lot of sound and we've been tracking their influence all around the world i visited thirty four countries and the big space equally capture regulatory agencies and capture government administration so in fact they captured the food and drug administration it was their former attorney michael taylor who was in charge of policy at the f.d.a. when the g.

jeffrey toobin, legal expert and staff writer for the new yorker and author of a new book, the oath, the obama white house and the supreme court. jeffrey, thank you very much for being here tonight. >> good to be with you, rev. >> wednesday i know because i'm going to be down there and there's a lot of action that this court is going to hear and decide that could up in voting rights and same-sex marriage. >> and you can see george w. bush's impact on those issues. in 2003, justice o'connor browr, diversity is a legitimate goal and the case you're going to hear, the fisher case out of the university of texas, is a direct challenge to that and a threat to affirmative action in public universities but it could lead essentially to the death of affirmative action and and you covered in this book, and i'm reading it, very good book, that a lot of the behind the scenes back and forth around the affordable health care act when it went before the court and people were stunned, i among them, when john roberts voted and you write in the book and i want to read, this is out of the book, quote, by demanding that roberts kill our entire health care law, the four conservative justices prompted them to look for some kind of middle ground. roberts felt obligated to protect the institutional interests of the court, not just his own philosophical agenda. now, doing that, he uncost merrily went against the conservatives, members of the court. >> he certainly did and count me among those who are shocked and predicted wrongly. justice sees himself as the chief justice, as the embodiment of the court and after citizens united, after bush v. gore to do it a third time in a relatively short period of time would have damaged the court and romney found that middle ground under the taxing power of congress and he upheld the law but don't think that john roberts has suddenly. >> a mentor of mine said, be when he said that, he did not find it, they had the right to deal with interstate commerce. >> right. >> but that they could deal with tax law, most of the civil rights legislation was built around interstate commerce. >> it sure was. >> that is not a good sign for some of the stuff that you're dealing with now. >> including the voting rights which they are going to be dealing with. >> because if he already said in the affordable care act decision that he does not find that the interstate commerce is allowable, then how does he turn around in the voting rights decision and say it? >> well, he has the voting rights act in his sights, the depth. you saw it in a case out of texas and basically what roberts has said, maybe in 1965 these states covered by the voting rights act, maybe it was justified then but the country has changed so much and these states have changed so much that they need to be freed from the restricts of the voting rights act even though this law has made such an enormous difference in the african-american political representation. >> 2009, chief justice roberts gave some indication that when he questioned the constitutionality of the voting rights act, which is what you just said, in court opinion he wrote, things have changed in the south. this is it in a court opinion. blatantly discriminatory evasions of federal decrees are rare. the act imposes current burdens and must be justified by current needs. so when people see us rallying out there, we are actually looking at a chief justice that you thoroughly went through in this book that may, in fact, turn the voetiting rights act around. we're looking at historic times. >> and he will serve much longer than george w. bush, barack obama. these justices serve -- they don't serve for four year terms. they serve decade after decade and that's why the issue is so important. >> you gave a fascinating portrait of how similar yet different allies of president obama and john roberts swo him in and had to do the oath again. both of them had ties to chicago. both of them harvard, both of them harvard law review. i mean, it was amazing how they were like flip sides of the same coin. >> it is. they do a fascinating parallels. but the paradox of the difference is that john roberts when it comes to the constitution is the candidate of change. he's the one who wants to change the law on abortion, on civil rights, on the death penalty, on all of these areas whereas obama is much more of a cautious conservative when it comes to the course. he's the one saying, let's leave things the way they are. the law is okay the way it is. roberts is part of the generation of conservatives. ronald reagan brought them to washington who said, we have to change the law. >> i've been trying to tell everybody, i'm a conservative. i'm trying to conserve the voting rights act, conserve affirmative action. i'm the conservative. so glad jeffreyon the show to affirm that for me. >> that's my goal, rev. >> jeffrey toobin. the book is, the oath, the obama white house and the supreme court. you need to read it and get ready for this year. thanks for being here tonight, jeff. we'll be right back. stop! stop! stop! come back here! humans -- we are beautifully imperfect creatures living in an imperfect world. that's why liberty mutual insurance has your back with great ideas like our optional better car replacement. if your car is totaled, we give you the money to buy one a model year newer. call... and ask one of our insurance experts about it today. hello?! we believe our customers do their best out there in the world, and we do everything we can to be there for them when they need us. [car alarm blaring] call now and also ask about our 24/7 support and service. call... and lock in your rate for 12 months today. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy? >>> i want to close tonight about the positive jobs repor

jeffrey maierr maier.let's... 1996 playoffs... o's vs. yankees.../derek jeter... hitt a ball deep../ . ony tarasco... rrady to catch it.../ but... &p jeffrey maier.. reaches out... from the stands and catches the ball instead...///..he umpires call it a home run... eeen though after slow you... can see maier... interfere....// the yankees... won that series our gaaes to one. we've... pplice officer... under investigaaion.../ for... his... suupected involvement... of... a... 133. - yeaa-old girl../. cleared... of any wrongdoing.n - &pwrongdoing.in a first on fox.... keith daniels, live n downtown baltimore.. wwerr prosecutors say officer john ward will ot bb charged with a crime.. keith. jennifer..... the city state's attooney's office released the news today..but only after we called them followinggup on the investigation. and tonight.. accordinn to ttii statement.. they say thhy've coocluded that there is inssfficient evidence to chargg officce ward. ////// 3 ward had been under investigation.. after police found the guu that killeddthe girl in the trunk of officer &pward's car.. after her body had een hidden in a pile of trass. sources s

jeffrey dicks is around the table. jeffrey, your interpretation of these figures?ll, i'll start with the policy, if i may, because that's what really interests me. i'm surprised that david miles didn't vote for some more qe this month. you said it was unanimous on qe as well as on the interest rate decision. a month ago, he was flagging, or we assume it was him, was suggesting he was getting very close to voting for more qe, but i guess he's stayed with the committee and they'll look at it again in november in the context of their upcoming forecast. then we're most likely to get another round of qe. >> under what justification? >> the minutes there are saying that they suggest the outlook for the real economy is weaker. we're in a very peculiar position with the bank of england, because despite yesterday's good inflation data, the average was above what they thought in august. q-4 isn't going to come down again as they expected in august. but instead of -- we used to think with the taylor rule that if inflation was above target, then that would lead to a monetary t

jeffrey and rbc old cutting microsoft today. jeffrey has a $34 target. also looking at yahoo!cular. yahoo! savior, the new ceo, marissa mayer, she came in to save yahoo!. we are looking here today because she has had her baby. her husband tweeted they had a beautiful baby boy. she will be back to work as soon as possible. likely and wanted -- likely in wanted to weeks. nicole: -- cheryl: oklahoma, michigan and south carolina in the fight. the law empowers government at the expense of the states, taxpayers in the constitution. joining us now from columbia. thank you for taking the time to be with us. i think people need to understand exactly what you are talking about. that we are giving federal officials who are not elected the ability to basically liquidate companies. >> absolutely. if you look at the constitution, you know, congress has the power to create uniform walls covering the subject matter of bankruptcy. the purpose of any law that congress passes should be to narrow the field of uncertainty. this expands the field. states like south carolina, michigan and oklahoma a

bestride jeffrey in nevada -- let's try jeffrey in nevada.ler: republicans and democrats are on different sides of the same totem pole. you will get the same outcome. guest: i will offer up a prediction. we will find ourselves in a continued state of war. military interventions that results in hundreds of millions of enemies to this country that wouldn't otherwise exist. then i want to offer up a prediction. . . everybody understands that this has to be mutual sacrifice on the part of all laws, and i will use that "mutual. as long as it is neutral, i think we will fix this. about one we are a alleged believe that we are doing nothing, but we do nothing and we fix it? somehow growth is going to come out of nowhere? we have 0% interest rates. and we are stagnant. it's the federal reserve, auditing the federal reserve, i would love to turn on lights and understand what is in the federal reserve balance sheet how much are they buying up? how many assets are they buying? and whatever they buy they inflate in value. in this case, the bear buying up

jeffrey summons about europe's austerity program which many governments believe will save the ailing economies coming up. i'm talking to jeffrey summers an associate professor at the university of wisconsin milwaukee he's also a co is rare and contributor to the forthcoming book the contradictions office start see this so secret on the cost of the new liberal both model jeffrey the contradictions office terrorists everyone is talking about susteren see in the comics i started what about the policies office terrorists was terribly austere of course i mean we've seen massive pain that's been inflicted by these policies throughout the globe. the incredible migration of workers from countries that have been impacted by these policies the social costs as you know have been significant as well in terms of educational institutions either being. contracted or shut down hospitals being shut down so the policies have been terribly austere can we have this new disease let's say using a medical metaphor the existing fields i would say that we're using potions not pills and so in other words it's kind of a medieval system of medicine that we're seeing applied here rather than modern medicine we should be thinking in those terms at all we should be thinking about people who are practicing medicine but have no qualifications or training.

jeffrey brown now who is with-- jeffrey, are threw in other studio. >> brown: i am here. i'm joined by presidential historian michael burb love and our political edit ever christina. and we are going try to dot first wrap of history and the longer look. christina you got the first draft which these days is a zillion tweets, what was happening. >> a lot of things. partisans on twitter looking at facebook were far more encouraged on both sides. you saw a lot of desperation and people wanting to sort of see the president do better last week and a lot of republicans saying that mitt romney really won. tonight you see democrats far more encouraged by what you were seeing. but you saw the campaigns taking more control of the messages on twitter. the obama campaign or partisans-- . >> brown: you mean as it was happening. >> on the democratic tag start aid hashtag called ryan's choice where they put in some their policy zingers as the debates going. that remained a trending topic for most of the night which did not happen last week amount of that went out of control with other topics. and ended up being more interesting. and then you also saw a lot of the reaction to as mark and david and gwen and judy were talking about, the facial expressions of these candidates. >> brown: particularly joe biden. >> but also paul ryan and his look. we see on twit certificate that people will create pictures or funny things like that. and get a little bit more of the joking elements. but the policy did shine through. >> michael, it was said going in, we said it earlier tonight that this had a lot more writing on it than most usual vice president debates am how did it feel to you? >> well, you know, if you look for historical precedent, 1976 second debate gerald ford made this enormous gaffe saying that the soviets did not control eastern europe. then came a vice presidential debate between walter mondale and his choice bob dole, everyone on the republican side was hoping that dole and inn that debate would stop the bleeding. dole did the opposite. and said you know, democratic presidents have been responsible for 1.6 million deaths in the 20th century, didn't help at all. i think in contrast to that, if democrats were looking at this debate as something that would stop the bleeding that started when barack obama had a bad night last week, i think this is going to do it. >> brown: all right, that sea a first look. going it to throw it back to judy and gwen now and come back later. >> we are going to go back to the debate side in kentucky at centre college where jonathan martin of "politico" and sam youngman of routers have been covering this. jonathan martin, you have spent some time follows this joe biden around the obama biden campaign. getting your tie adjusted right now. we want to you have injure tie on straight for this. jonathan, just based on-- based on watching joe biden on the trail and you know what the obama-biden team has been doing. how did joe biden come across tonight. what did he accomplish in. >> judy, this was the full joe biden. joe biden in full tonight. what you saw this evening, here at centre colleges with what people who have been watching him on the campaign trail, not just this year but the last 40 years in american politics has seen. he is demon strattive, at times over the top. he is what he is. some folks like t others don't. but it's raw, it's authentic and it's certainly real. look, i think he had some clear blows tonight on paul ryan, on substance, certainly on the issue about whether or not ryan wanted to have a stimulus in wisconsin for his district. on question about its entitlements in this country, certainly on the romney comment over the 47% of americans who don't pay taxes. the big question to me is was biden's bidenism, his mannerism, his reaction on so many of those shots that we saw on our tv screen tonight, does that overshadow some of what i think were some good moments of substance tonight for democrats. >> you're home tonight in kentucky but you have been spending time on the road traveling not only with mitt romney but also with paul ryan. did he come with a plan tonight that he executed? >> well, i don't know that he was ever able to get whatever plan he might have had into motion because joe biden was on offense from the very beginning. look, paul ryan told us yesterday in st. pete, he said you know, look, this is going to be my first big debate on the big stage. joe biden has done this a hundred times. i think it showed tonight. i think biden's message was basically welcome to my turf, rookie. the thing that paul ryan i think did very well tonight was keep his compose sure. i think people that like joe biden really liked what they saw tonight. people that don't like joe biden probably found him on knock-- obnoxious and overbearing. my sense is that paul ryan probably scored points with people when he asked the vice president to stop interrupting, that the american people would be better served. by a better, more polite debate. i don't know that, you know, i don't know that paul ryan did any real damage tonight. but he certainly didn't draw any blood. >> woodruff: jonathan martin, to the extent the obama campaign was feeling the need tonight for the vice president to get them back on track, is there a sense that the vice president was able to pull that off tonight? >> well, that's what ot bama posters are saying right now. hi one senior obama official e-mail me and say if you are talk approximating about mannerisms you lost, which is to say that the romney focus on the vice president's mannerisms was a concession that on substance they lost the evening. i think the point that christina made earlier is right on. for partisans on both sides tonight, you felt good. ryan got in there his first debate against a 40 year veteran of american politics, he did okay. and biden i think he showed the kind of offense, the aggressiveness that so many democrats were hoping for from the president last week. i think democrats are feeling a heck of a lot better tonight than they were last week in denver. the big question to me is what did that remaining middle out there tonight in places like ohio, in florida and virginia, what did they think. were they turned off by biden's interrupting, by biden's sighs and his laugh. or were they you know, content to think that's just biden being biden. he is an old politician who talks a lot. and he is who he is. and the fact is, you know, on substance perhaps they liked what he had to say more. i really thoughts that when he went after ryan on entitlements saying where i come from, folks can't afford that, was really effective. and then towards the end of the debate real fast when biden said, when martha raddatz asked the question of paul ryan, do women in this country have to worry about legal a box the pause that ryan gave, i thought, for a lot of suburban women was damaging. >> let me ask that question to sam youngman, paul ryan doesn't spend a lot of time talking about foreign policy on the campaign trail even though that was the bulk of this debate tonight. i wonder how much, de seem to you like he was cramming for that, and also it did he seem like he was prepared for that question about abortion and catholicism at the end? >> well, i don't think there is any question that the romney-ryan ticket would have prefered that all 90 minutes tonight would have been about the economy, it was maybe 10 to 15 minutes just on benghazi. but nass's not what the debate was. i think congressman ryan showed that he had been really cramming on foreign policy. he showed i think great familiarity with the situation in afghanistan, even though i think the romney-ryan ticket continues to struggle to sort of show what they would do differently in afghanistan. quite frankly, my brother say veteran of afghanistan i was thrilled to hear it discussed so much tonight. but i do think one of the criticisms will you hear from republicans probably going forward was that there wasn't enough discussion of the economy tonight. i don't, i tend to agree with jonathan, i saw a very long pause from congressman ryan when the discussion turned to abortion. i don't think he was probably prepared to discuss that. at least not in such a point-blank fashion. de get some questions on it yesterday. but i don't think that he was ready for that to be such a hot debate topic. >> woodruff: sam youngman and jonathan martin, we thank you both for joining us. appreciate it. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> woodruff: and now we are back in washington and we want to go once again to our colleagues here in the other studio, jeffreybrown. >> brown: i want to pick up with you, christina. pick up on what we were hearing about the mannerisms versus substance, the screens we were talking about, the dual screens, sometimes the split screen, depends how people watch. >> it really does. you are influenced by ba you are seeing on that screen and maybe its second screen, pew research center just came out with a poll today that showed that 11% of people that are watching these debates were watching it with another screen, whether that is your laptop on your lap, your computer there with you or maybe on your iphone and that means are you monitoring your social network, posting on face boork, reading what people are say on twitter and influenced by what people are saying. the reaction people were saying immediately that the president lost that debate and that sort of began early on in the debate. well this evening people felt like joe biden came out swinging, was aggressive and that sur fasd but one of the campaigns these ar

bestride jeffrey in nevada -- let's try jeffrey in nevada. caller: republicans and democrats are on different sides of the same totem pole. you will get the same outcome. but for a guy like you, there is a change that we need and believe in. guest: i will offer up a prediction. if either obama or romney are elected, we will find ourselves in a continued state of war. military interventions that results in hundreds of millions of enemies to this country that wouldn't otherwise exist. then i want to offer up a prediction. i think we are looking at a monetary collapse. we just cannot escape the mathematics of what we are doing. host: we have a question from twitter. >> i find it an exciting notion that the libertarian president would challenge democrats on what they are supposed to be good at, civil liberties. let's not bomb i ran. let's get out of afghanistan. let's recognize marriage equality. let's stop the drug wars. let's repeal the patriot act. let's repeal the national defense authorization act. this is what they are supposed to be good a

jeffrey broke his hand during the jaguars games. sources tell the tribune he could miss a few games, but coach lovie smith would only say jeffrey is bangedrn this season. earl bennet is expected to return from a hand injury in two weeks. the bears' defense had three more take- aways on sunday, and they lead the league with 17 this season. lovie smith still sees room for improvement. >> >> we have gotten off to a good start. the bulls open the pre- season against the grizzlies at the united center tonight. joakim noah is a game- time decision. he's been overseas dealing with a personal matter. the bulls' "bench mob" will look very different this year with six new players in the rotation. the one holdover is taj gibson, who's in his fourth season and now considered the leader of the group. that's a look at sports. your live illinois lottery drawing is next. >>winning pick 3 numbers. 33,1 winning pick 4 numbers. 4,0,7,9 >>jopin us tonight for the mega millions. i have a cold, and i took nyquil, but i'm still stubbed up. [ male announcer ] truth is, nyquil doesn't unstuff your nose. what? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus liquid gels spee

jeffrey mayer moment. >> sorry. it was close last night. >> we are owed for that. >> the jeffrey thing, that's over. that is a curse. the o's are going to take that bat. it's been 15 years. we have been living with that. i'm done. this is it. >> i'll tell you the truth. i took my young kids to three o's games this year. it's been a lot of fun. it's been great. they are a great team. a great story. but they are going down. >> hey. that's what makes the horse race, right bob? >> that's right, pauly. >> this is like a presidential debate. >> exactly. the heels of the vice presidential debate. >> that's malarkey. you have to love it. this is october baseball, we have two games in the dmv. the yankees and o's are underway as we speak. and actually, if you look at this series, they are split right down the middle. 22 innings, so the deciding one will be tonight and the deciding one tonight, who moves on to the nlcs, that's coming up at 8:30. we're going to be here to cover it all. we're excited to get this underway. >> i have not seen pauly and bobby b. so fired up since the beginning of their vacation. >

step forward and chase what matters. ,,,, officer jeffrey enslen is suspecte >>> the san jose police department has arrested one of its own. officer jeffrey enslen is suspected of committing grand theft as a result of time sheet fraud. the department's criminal investigation detail caught on to the discrepancy after a nine- month investigation. he is on administrative leave being booked at a santa clara jail. >> anytime you have an officer booked for felony crime it's disappointing to the rank-and- file. we count on one another to do a good job and to do the right things for the right reasons. >> prior to this incident, officer enslen had served the san jose police department for 15 years. the case is now in the hands of the district attorney. >>> the pursuit only lasted a matter of seconds. about but in that time shot were fired and an innocent driver was injured. it came to an end at eddie and frankly streets. add don knapp reports, police are still trying to find the man responsible. >> reporter: that's right, dana. as police tell us, a cadillac was heading east on eddie towards van ness about the same time a taxicab was coming north o

jeffrey, was born with down's syndrome. he is about 43 right now. her husband passed away a few years ago. she is at home with jeffrey, and she has devoted the last 43 years of her life to making sure that jeffrey's life is as full and complete as can possibly be. a hero to me. i think of the single moms across the country who are scrimping and saving right now. so they can have a good meal on the table at the end of the day for their children. i think of the men and women who are working two jobs right now and perhaps a mom working the day shift and a dad working the night shifts so they rarely see each other. why? so their kids will be able to have those clothes that other kids at school have. i think of the number of couples across america that will not have christmas this year, but instead, are going to scrimp and save so they can give their kids a better christmas. we are a generous people who are known cafaro large harvests and our willingness to give to others and improved -- for our large harvests and our willingness to give to others and improve their lives. you can see what needs to be done. i am counting on you to be able to see the importance in this race and to be able to make the ri

jeffrey, has downs syndrome. he is 43 now. her husband died years ago and she is with jeffrey.he has spent 43 years to making sure his life is as full and complete as it can possibly be. a hero, to me. i think of the single moms across the country who are saving so they can have a good meal on the table at the end of the day. i think of the men and women working two jobs. they wrok two jobs so their kids can have the clothes others have. and the couples who won't have christmas this year -- but will save to give theri kids a better christmas. we are known for our willingness to give to others. this is that time in america. we face real challenges. the people of ohio are given to have real eyes. i am counting on you to make the right choice. there was a fictional football team -- called friday night lights. the athletes would go off and touch a sign that said, "clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose." i am convinced on november 6, the people of ohio, with clear eyes and full hearts, will make sure america can't lose. we are taking back this country. [applause] >> one more thing i w

jeffrey do you have marijuana on you? [laughter] that is a really legitimate alert. he sniffed the air and sat down looking at the location where jeffrey hit his marijuana. [laughter] in a little baggie. [applause] all the dog works for is a toy. that is all he gets. the dog is just simply trying to find the marijuana, methamphetamine cocaine or heroin. this dog is trained to find ecstasy and the dog simply thinks it's one of those odors and when he finds it he stops and sits. >> when andy was a k-9 officer at the dog alerted and nothing was found the dog would not get the toy. the dog would not get the reward. but in most instances are let's just say many instances the dog gets it no matter what. as a result the dog has no incentive to alert only when the contraband is there. that is one of the problems. we also didn't touch on one of the problem and that is certification. most of the certifications are completely meaningless. they are typed out on a computer after some private person maybe qualifies, maybe maybe unqualified sissoko this dog is certified. here's your certification. there is no real certification for handlers, for dogs and dogs and handlers together in many instances in certain departments are great. certain federal government agencies are great but even so they alert to the owner and not to the substance you should be counted at all to justify. >> and i say something? we just saw here, we were all the thinking of this as a search. typically it's hard to say what the dog is doing here looking for the order or the drugs however you want to characterize it is a search which presumptively requires a warrant. ports of entry or being safe like that. if it's not a search then he goes round everybody's house walking on the street looking for stuff or you stand in line in a movie theater to search everybody and again once the technology gets there at some point maybe it becomes better than a k-9 unit they will just have monitoring stations all over the place and the dog might not even need to be there. i think it's hard to argue -- >> anyone else? >> what else would you all like to know for to see? >> i get asked to look at cases all over the united states with detection dogs. i've been an expert at looking for cases for several years now and the one thing i look at all the time or the training records and of course the certification. we want make sure the dog is trained properly on proper amounts of dark products and shouldn't be trained on residual odors only. getting the best training equipment possible. basically training on six ounces and above meaning a pound or something like that so you don't get a lot of alerts on residual odors on door knobs. we want the dog to find a pound of stuff not just a tiny bit. >> you think there should be some sort of testing requirement for dogs? >> i believe that in all cases. right now we have bed bugs dogs are so unregulated right now. that is not a real good certification or governing body that looks at the type of thing so there are good dogs out there doing good work basically with handlers with dogs that aren't even trained to find anything. they just walk in and they'd get the dog to sit somewhere and they're able to get paid for doing really nothing. >> day that i had to to a case in u.s. district court in new york and because the judge, the federal judge had received a request he had a dog come in. it was a private company that did it and i watched it because this is something i'm very interested in. it was a complete joke. they cleared the courtroom. comes in and the dog was not sniffing and working. the dog had his tail up in the air and he was walking around. the courtroom is clear. this is what happens all the time and that dog was not qualified. our government probably paid a fortune for the contract to contracting of contract to have the dog committed every day and it was so meaningless. this is what often happens. a lot of these police dogs are not qualified period but even if they are doesn't mean anything. >> there really needs to be a governing body to oversee everything. i don't have a problem with that whatsoever. the problem is you can't get to people to agree on anything especially trainers. in one case that i had they'd handlers handler signed his own certificate. the master trainer. that is not the kind of stuff i want for my industry so i have a good qualified cord to qualify our dogs for this type of work. >> that's a great idea. i wasn't going to make drucker. comments about the dogs but it does seem like a mouth these cases the dog handlers always say my dog is 100% accurate and that sort of hard to believe in all cases. >> there absolutely is no dog that is 100% accurate. we are not in dogs are not either. there again the handler needs to read the dog and if the dog sits you need to know whether the dog was sitting because of an order because he walked the dog are excellently cute the dog. there are few behaviors that happen before happened before the dog sits. you will see on the cameras when he is later when he got to the order you saw his behavior change. he knows it's about ready to pop up from somewhere. his breathing will change in his mouth will often close as he starts to smith and those are signs. when the dog is searching a car, there are other mitigating factors. >> you think it would be a good idea and is it okay with you if the searches were videotaped? i take it there are some concerns that the handlers are queuing the dogs and i would think after-the-fact mimi the defendant or the lawyer would like to sort of watch with the dog did and how -- is that possible and would it be a good idea to require videotaping as the dog alerts on something? by its cheap enough now and in the past not everyone could afford to have a video but it's getting less and less expensive. a light would help because they can also do something with their voice. cameras have been known to change their voices as they get closer to where it is they want the dog to alert. i welcome that and i think there are many officers who wouldn't unfortunately. maybe their rights are being violated or -- but i welcome it and i think it would be a good idea. >> anybody else have questions? >> i have a question. [inaudible] >> i am wrote a book. [laughter] is called the detection dog manual and you can get it on line. also k-9 detection dog manual. i'm not sure if you will find too many out there that are written in the way that all of you can understand. because there are so many dogs and words of people use. i'm going to let the dog off the leash. i'm not doing anything with the caller but some dog trainers -- but it's written in plain english. good boy. i saw you had your copy in hand. >> this is great but the reality is on the road when their cars going by there could be a dog on the other side of the street and most of the searches are done with the leash which means queuing -- subconscious or unconscious off leash. >> may i ask the panel is to questions? i am a newspaper reporter so i need a simple answer to these for the sake of newspaper articles. i'm interested in two things. what do you think the courts should rule if you are deciding the case, what should they say and i'm also interested in the question about what is the bad consequence of the court goes the wrong way? i mean why should ordinary americans care about this? any order you want. what do you think the court should say in these cases? >> well, i was one of the people who wrote the briefs on behalf of the nec dl. i personally believe that what we wrote is correct. i think the dog sniff clearly is a search. the question is whether it is a reasonable search and the court to date has evaded the question of under what circumstances this kind is reasonable by simply saying it's not a search at all. the right thing to do would be to acknowledge the search and go from there. with regard to -- again i think the florida supreme court should be affirmed. i think it's not positioned for reasons that we just heard. simply to say this dog is trained, there are many different types of training. some work, some don't. there are wide variations of the reliability of dogs and there should be some additional evidence to show that this dog sniff actually constitutes probable cause to believe that there is contraband in whatever areas being searched. with regard to the consequences, i already touched on that a bit. if the court continues down the path of saying dog sniffs are not searches at all, first of all law enforcement will be completely unfettered to use drug dogs however they wish. that could lead to random sweeps of neighborhoods or people limited only by restrictions the fourth amendment puts on seizures. and, more broadly, again, as technology develops, if the court continues down the path of saying there are some searches that we and ordinarily parlance would cause searches that only detects contraband and therefore are not searches at all. the encroachment on our privacy is going to increase ever further as it moves on. >> i was a little puzzled as to what the florida supreme court really meant or wanted in the harris case. that is the car case and they said, as danielle said it's not enough just to say the dog has been certified. unique more performance evidence that i was wondering how would that work? jeffreyaybe would know this better. every time there is a case where drug evidence is used, the prosecution would have to come in and show what's? that there is some sort of test? he has gone out 100 times and has been right 95. what would be the evidence that would be enough to convince the judge that this dog was reliable? >> the traditional test for probable cause is totality of the circumstance and they think the state in hair and is essentially advocating don't look at the circumstances. if a police officer gets on the stand and says this dog is trained, that should be enough. we are arguing now, one should look at the totality of the circumstances. they can't be some kind of ers gripes checklist that has to be checked off, but something more than simply the assertion that a dog is trained and that might be a description of how the dog is trained and the record of its performance in training. it might be the record of the dog's performance in the fields. the dog alerted x number of times

jeffrey katzenberg. but rupert murdoch's donations are all to republicans. and clint eastwood has more company in romney's camp. others include jerry bruckheimer, sylvester stallone, kelsey grammar and lion's gate jeffreyt. more republicans in the vc crowd and more democrats in the executive ranks. case in point is facebook, where sheryl sandberg has deep roots in democratic politics. facebook's political -- but two of the company's highest profile investors have poured money into conservative causes. mark an dreesen backs romney, donated nearly $200,000 to republican causes while peter thiel has given nearly $5 million to conservative and libertarian super pacs. he backed ron paul. many lean left, microsoft's steve balmer and sin ga's mark pinkas. now the candidates agree on silicon valley's reform in sib err securi cyber security. but the biggest argument is the internet. net neutrality, which is preventing broadband providers from discriminating against certain types of data, which is a stance that romney opposes. carl, back over to you. >> interesting stuff. although the state may go blue, we'll see, there's certainly a number of people that go the other way. bell is about to sound across europe. w

jeffrey just brought up. he mentioned energy. that has been something obama has been pushing. there has been some pushback from the republicans. there is a corridor of nevada that is tapped into the california grid. jeffreyentioned the housing market and the obama surrogates being in nevada all the time. there was an editorial board interview last year where romney said the housing market should be allowed to bottom out. you cannot say that in nevada. there are so many people who need some sort of assistance. the parties cannot agree about whether it should take the fund washington should be trying to force some kind of principle reduction program. they are not sure the government should be pushing the banks around. people criticize romney about being callous about the particular problems of nevada and how severe the problems were when he made those comments. host: we have another caller from nevada. caller: i am looking at the bat out of 50 states -- nevada being 49th or 50th in education. i just moved to nevada. i cannot see where they are on education. host: carrie brings up some of the personalities in nevada. guest: education is a huge issue in nevada. nevada has not qualify for a race to the top fu