jeffrey: nope. i have had five careers. emily: i should say katzenberg 5.0 is where we are. jeffrey: i am on 6.0. in my 20's. i had 11 years at paramount. 10 years at disney. 10 years at dreamworks in a partnership with steven and david, and 12 to 13 years at dreamworks animation as a standalone, public company. each chapter for me somehow or another has gotten better than the one before. i don't know why. i don't know how. it is not something one could have expected, right? in some instances that would seem improbable if not impossible that i could have a better run. somehow or another, every time it has occurred. so getting fired from disney was as humiliating and low a moment as i have had in my career. eight days after i left the walt disney company, humiliated, embarrassed, hurt, broken from a 19 year partnership and marriage, eight days later, i announced a partnership with steven spielberg and david geffen to start dreamworks animation, where we had raised $2 billion. eight horrible days, oh my. so, you know, a chapter closes, and i don't know about you and i don't go back and read chapter

to la so there's a small office in new york, a bigger office in la and the executive team, jeffrey katzenberg and the women he split around him on the development side with jeffrey is incredibly diverse and incredibly female centric and what i took from that immediately was two people at the top saying if i'm going to create my own company we are going to do it with the people who we want to create content for so it's pretty young at the executive level and its diverse city at the executive level and i was really, that made me really happy when i walked into the biggest meeting that i was in when i was in la because something similar happened when i walked into the original meeting at vice news tonight that i walked into this room, they were having some meeting at a bowling alley in brooklyn and i was like it's going to be a bunch of hipsters and i'm from dc but i walked in and it was literally gay,straight, black, white, asian , hispanic, trans in that room and this is before we started making the show itself and well, this is the group my boss has gotten together and i think we're going to

you have jeffrey katzenberg introducing qwibi next year. people want to stream content.e 85 million subscribers to multi-channel television. my guess is the number of homes that actually have to have sports and news, the only way they can get that is a linear tv package. that is 40 to 50 million homes. you have 30 to 40 million homes that will come out of the pay-tv bundle, the cut the cord-tight bundling, and they will find new ways of adding content whether netflix, amazon, hulu, disney plus, apple tv plus. all of these are far easier and cheaper to subscribe to than cable was. you can sign up, you can cancel, you can have a few. this really empowers the consumer to create a bundle they want versus being forced to take channels they never wanted. how many people are paying $900 espn anda month for never watch it? kurt: i do feel like this can be somewhat confusing to the general consumer when you think about all these players and price points. obviously some of them are advertising but are not yet available. are these streaming services doing a good job of actually mar

you have jeffrey katzenberg introducing could be next year.ere you look, there is more and more content. the reality is the consumer is a spending right now 80 to $100 a month for linear tv packages. you still have 80 million subscribers to multichannel television. the homes that actually have to have a sports and news and the only way they can get that is through a linear television package it -- that is 40 million to 50 million homes. you will have 40 million homes andng out of the billing find new ways to get content, all of these are far easier and cheaper to subscribe to then cable was. you can sign up, cancel, you can have a few of them for a. of time. this empowers the consumer to create the bundle that they want, as opposed to being forced they nevernnels that wanted. >> i do feel that this can be somewhat confusing to the general consumer when you think about all of these different players, different price points. mother them are already advertising, but are not yet available, are these a streaming service a good job of marketing them

you've got jeffrey katzenberg introducing the service next year.e you look, there is more and more content. the reality is, the consumer is spending $80 to a month for $100 linear tv patches. you have still got millions of subscribers to multi channel television. my guess is that the number of homes that have to have sports and news, you have got 30 million to homes coming out 40 million of the bundle. they will find new ways to get content. all of these are far easier and cheaper to subscribe to than cable. you can have a few for a time, this really empowers the consumer to create the bundles they want. how may people are paying for espn and never watch it? >> i do feel this can be someone confusing. -- somewhat confusing. when you think about all of these different players and price points, some of them are already advertising. i'm wondering, are these streaming services doing a good job of actually marketing themselves and how is that playing out? >> one challenge they have is they are drawing so much attention. so the narrative about the servic

you have jeffrey katzenberg introducing whidbey, but every where you look, people want to stream contentumer is spending right month for0 dollars a linear tv packages. you still have millions of subscribers to multichannel television. the number of homes that actually have to have sports and news, and the only way they can get that is through a linear tv package, that is 40,000,000-50,000,000 homes that are going to come out of the pay-tv bundle. the cut the cord tied bundling. they're going to find new ways of getting content whether it is netflix, amazon or hulu or disney plus or apple tv plus. andof these are easier cheaper to subscribe to then cable was. you can cancel, you can have a few of them for a period of time. this empowers the consumer to create the bundle they want instead of being forced to take channels they didn't want. >> i do feel like this can be somewhat confusing to the consumer when you think about all these different players and price points. some of them are already advertised but not yet available. are these streaming services doing a good job of marketing thems