and on the other hand, we can have a jeffrey sachs who suggested that smithy markets have led to an equity exploitation and environmental degradation. and all this ,-comcome was but a socially awkward 18th century scottish philosopher who wrote after all, only two books his whole life which is hardly enough to give him a full professorship in an american university these days. so this is just something of a puzzle. who really is this person, adam smith? what were these momentous ideas, good or bad. how could a person an obscure profession in an obscure place in an obscure time have brought such tremendous effect on the world? if there's been as one might expect quite a range of writing on adam smith from all manner of perspectives and throat for disclosure i myself have contributed to that. smith has indeed been appropriate by many people including an entire academic disciplines, by political parties, by schools of economics, by moral agendas officers the own purposes. so it can make one wonder reasonably whether one might get a true measure of the man. where can one find an account of smi