our guest today is the famous economist, jeffrey sachs.jeffrey sachs, well, of course, about ukraine. i think this war goes back to the time of nato expansion, which with the us started in the mid-nineties. zelensky, the ukrainian leadership is terrible. they just don't know what to do with it. i think the war will end the day biden picks up the phone and calls president putin and says, nato will not expand, this was a bad idea, we are stopping, we need to find a way for ukraine to survive. vanilla cola or cotton candy , smoke without fire, here you sold it to a minor child without documents, all the hookahs were sold, of course, but the hookah hookah, this is all that mows down our youth, they were specially accepted the law is that there should be no advertising for children , but getting an electronic cigarette for a schoolchild is not a problem, there is a wide choice, a sale of 150 rubles, you smoke, well, that’s right, this is the kind of business, what can you do? there are more and more cases of the new vep disease, it’s like, well

what did we talk about with jeffrey sachs, well of course, about ukraine.led, they just don't know what they're doing about it. i think that the war will end on the day when biden picks up the phone and calls the president and says, nato will not expand, it was a bad idea, we are stopping, but the teacher, the students should ask the teacher, why is this, and what does the president have in mind there and there, well, the teacher should be able to tell why so and well and not otherwise, in principle, you know, for this there is no need to change the constitution, seriously , well, that is, maybe somehow we’ll start with this, or the political workers there, yes, well, that’s what we’re fighting for, because thesis on national liberation...

today our guest will be the famous economist jeffrey sachs, which we talked about with jeffrey sachs,the ukrainian leadership made a terrible mistake by listening to the americans then. and no success was achieved . washington doesn't know that their policy has failed, they just don't know what to do about it. i think the war will end the day biden picks up the phone and calls president putin and says, nato won't expand, it was a bad idea, we 're stopping, we need to find a way to... well, they struck twice, that doesn't help. massive blow, yes, and you see, the leaders of the country mean somewhere they warn that we will get out of here altogether, and where it was clear that we will finish they say, listen, of course we are very bad iranians and in general, but we will still give you money, we will unfreeze you, we are here, tell your formations there, no matter what they do, has anyone ever seen this, but the problem is that there is no one to tell, no, that is, there is a connection, but they tell you,

today our guest will be famous economist, jeffrey sachs. what did we talk to jeffrey saxon about?ukraine. i think this war goes back to the nato expansion that the us started in the mid-nineties. zelensky, the ukrainian leadership made a terrible mistake by listening to the americans then, and no success was achieved . washington doesn't know that their policy has failed, they just don't know what to do about it. i think it will end on the day when biden picks up the phone and calls president putin and says: there will be no nato expand, it was a bad idea, we are stopping, we need to find a way for ukraine to survive. indicators are higher than forecasts. rosneft published its operating results for 9 months. the company shared the data, although by decree the president has the opportunity not to disclose it. rosneft's activities are based on openness, development of existing projects and launches of new ones. this business model made it possible to increase the volume of hydrocarbons from january to september by 11% to 5.5 million barrels of oil equivalent. this is more than... ma

military operation, now i think it’s too late to say, but in any case, the natural intelligence of jeffrey sachsssing the picture, so i am now turning to the even more natural intelligence of boris aleksanovich rozhin, our permanent military expert who monitors the situation in real time, boris aleksanich. what news do you have from the fronts of the special military operation today? and good evening. on the front line, of course, i completely contradict michel’s statement, because the enemy in most areas, where he previously launched an offensive with specific goals, has practically either gone on the defensive or maintained local activity, the enemy is no longer conducting any global offensive actions there, this is completely accordingly disavows these statements from brussels, well, where they put a good face on a bad game, well, just in the direction in the area of ​​five the situation has not changed... the enemy in the area of ​​kopan, novoprokopovka, verbovoy was confidently occupied by our troops, the enemy was unable to advance anywhere , suffered , again, over the last 24 hours, losse

our guest today is the famous economist jeffrey sachs. made a terrible mistake by listening to the americans then, and no success was achieved. washington doesn't know the policy has failed, they just don't know what's wrong with it do. i think the war will end the day biden picks up the phone and calls president putin and says: nato will not expand, it was a bad idea, we are stopping, we need to find a way for ukraine to survive. the second question, of course, is the same one, which is with migrants, well, my position, firstly , you need to understand: i consider myself a russian director, but i am a son on my father’s side, i am the son of a migrant, my father was a migrant, he was a baken, a karabakh armenian , who came to moscow and, as they say, but he was still a citizen, he was a citizen of a large country, i understand, i’m saying, if it were one country, there would be no questions anyway, it was a problem, mine is like my mother

to continue funding the kiev regime will not bring anything good to ukraine, american economist jeffrey sachscording to him, military assistance from the united states only prolongs conflicts and leads to an increase in casualties among ukrainians. instead of spending money on kiev, washington should push forward negotiations with russia about peace in ukraine, sachs said. further news sports. sash championship continues in st. petersburg russian short course swimming. tell us about the return of six-time world champion yulia efimova. dima, for efimov this is the first major start in 2 years. in the 50m bras final, she finished third . on the second day of the russian short course swimming championship in st. petersburg , eight competed. medal effects. in the men's 100m backstroke, two-time olympic medalist kliment kolisnikov became the national champion. in the final, clement showed a time of 49 seconds and 12, this is the best time this season in the world. in the girls' 50m breaststroke, evgenia chikunova became the champion of russia. the nineteen-year-old athlete in the final was 41 hund

first, a big game is on the air, today we have a conversation with columbia university professor jeffrey sachsch for taking the time. i i looked at yours, thank you for inviting me, i looked at your statements recently, i must say that on two of the most important problems of international security, what is happening in ukraine, the crisis around ukraine, and what is happening between israel and hamas , the crisis around gaza, in that other case, you wrote serious and i’m not afraid to say courageous articles with very interesting proposals, if you don’t mind, i’ll start with ukraine, if you repeat, if possible, briefly, those basic proposals that you do to stabilize the situation in ukraine and get out of this constant crisis. this war is destroying ukraine. and as long as the war continues, ukraine will not only lose a lot of people, it will lose territory, and its very future is at risk. therefore, this war must end at the negotiating table. this war should not have happened in principle. with russia, none of this would have happened, but we need to go back 30 years ago, if the united state

network president jeffrey sachs, also gave his take on how to find a solution to the ongoing violence. today's meeting takes place at a time of several major wars. these wars may seem intractable, but they are not. indeed, i would suggest that all 4 wars could be ended quickly by agreement within the un security council. one reason is the major wars must be fed from the outside, both with extra rental finances and armaments. the un security council could agree to choke off these awful wars by withholding ex terminal, finance and armaments. this would require an agreement among the major powers consider in a similar way. ready in israel and palestine here to the war could be ended quickly by the council enforcing the many un security council resolutions made over several decades. calling for a return to the 1967 borders, an end of this real settlement activities in the occupied territories and the 2 state solution. it is high time. therefore, in my view for the un security council to enforce its decisions by implementing adjusting lasting solution that is in the interest of both israel

on the first, the great game, today we have a conversation with columbia university professor jeffrey sachst now there is another crisis, which you also wrote about, about the tragedy that is unfolding in gaza, and uh, you propose, if i understand you correctly , to support the efforts of the united nations, to resume... consultations on this crisis in the security council, where the five members of the permanent members of the security council have leverage over israel, over hamas, as far as i understand, this too, your proposal, does not arouse... enthusiasm for the biden administration, although it seems to me that the biden administration is not completely hopeless, your point of view, and by and large this is also political crisis, just like the ukrainian one, the crisis at a fundamental level is a political crisis, you know, as clausewitz once said that by means, therefore, when we see a war, we need to look at its political root causes, war is always a continuation of politics, it comes from the political situation, there is a solution, there is a un resolution, and security council

authoritative, they are also trying to ban him, by the way, but nevertheless, he goes to ether with jeffrey sachsd the russians, of course, drew a red line here, they said: no, this would not be of strategic importance for the russians, they simply could not allow it. was it rational for the bush administration to push for further nato expansion? i would argue with this, i think it is obvious to everyone that the burns memorandum said that the russians would resist. russia furiously opposed nato expansion in 1999, then in 2004, and we just shoved it down their throats. and i believe that the bush administration has all subsequent administrations. a diplomat from the united states, given the outbreak of the conflict in ukraine, an american diplomat asked: how can we convince the russians that nato does not pose a threat to them, are you kidding me?9, after the first wave in 1997, the first wave of expansion took place, well i started fighting back in the first state duma, ninety- four, when clinton first talked about it stuttered, so there was a serious struggle, and led by deputy glotov, i spoke

jeffrey sachs of course, he spoke beautifully about the coliseums, yes, they throw out there, what is the arena, that there will be a reduction in funding for ukraine, yes, and for this an imf mission arrived, they sharply reduced spending on education, medicine, and utilities, but this does not mean at all that they are leaving ukraine with its problems, they are simply increasing the efficiency of the allocated funds, that is, that attention is moving away from ukraine, ukraine was excellent a screen behind which 50 countries hid and led war against russia. ukraine was an excellent reason to increase the production of weapons; thanks to ukraine , the pentagon drew up a five-year program for the development of the production of its weapons. the article that was written for zaluzhny, i don’t think that zaluzhny thought that they wrote everything for a long time, it’s been a long time since i wrote to an economist, i’ll write for the respected one. especially for a dissertation, publication is needed, no, i think he was told by zaluzhny, so you wrote an article, this is a clear article

in the most difficult years, in troubled times, in the nineties and now, and the conclusion of jeffrey sachsamericans must urgently recalculate course, start negotiations, do not expand, recognize crimea and new regions are for russia , because ukraine is destroyed on the battlefield and is being destroyed from an economic and demographic point of view, european unity is falling, economic support for kiev too, anatoly mayorov figured out why the exit formula is already from... realist political scientist mearsheimer, russia will ultimately control the south and east of ukraine. this will freeze the conflict, but will make ukraine itself a failed state, it itself is to blame for this development of events, because instead of urgent negotiations it puts forward impossible conditions, because zelensky’s phrase must live with the current need for victims is already proof, he does not understand that war is a field peace negotiations between big players. for everyone, this is already like a new autumn tradition, every week to please. over the past 7 days, western cats have been burning on the zap