today we're speaking to professor jeffrey sachs, the director of the center for sustainable development at columbia university, and one of the world's leading economist, dr. sacks. thank you so much for joining say, where is the conscience? and where are the policies that are focused on the potential a war crimes every day in every way that you see out there and what should be done about it as well? what should be done about it is straightforward. of course, what the government of israel is doing is unconscionable. a world opinion is united against israel. the problem is the united states remains complicit in these war crimes because it's traditional and us politics, that politicians show no space between the united states and israel. now what's interesting is that we have seen i verbally by who i am schumer, i have been pretty explicit about the absolute unacceptability of the israeli government policies, but they haven't acted. but of course, a strong, effective view west president would do, would be to stop the flow of munitions if those munitions are being killed, they use for slaug

i really appreciate your candor, columbia university professor jeffrey sachs. thanks so much for joining us. great to be with you. thank you. so what's the bottom line? we'll have for a year into a war where israel has killed tens of thousands of innocent people and destroyed the infrastructure of a closed off area with roughly the population of an american states like connecticut in direct talks between hamas and israel are ongoing. with the biggest and most influential player, and all of this is the united states, which is simultaneously shipping bombs with no conditions on their use and taking 2 months to build a port of entry into gaza to deliver supplies, food, and medical. but let's just face it were desperately needed, months ago, like the presidents before him, 5 and sees and one and the risks of allowing israel to continue with war. and then the other hand, the political consequences of stopping it, especially in an election year. when will he decide that one out ways, the other, that's when the war will end. and that's the bottom line. the, the east t

russian official at all, but objectively, i think dmitry will confirm, a very respected expert, jeffrey sachsl experience, which is not without irony he told me that now victoria will be his colleague, they will work at the same university, he said, well, it’s probably better, well, at least that’s it, the main thing is that it’s not in the state department, these are his thoughts on the matter. yes, we know many facts, we know that the us knew about this attack in advance, we don’t know how, we didn’t know why, where, but this raises a very huge number of serious questions, and the fact that the us government has not clarified these questions , just simply shows the whole horror of the situation, if the attack was planned, it will eventually happened. on march 7th we remember that this was an attack on a shopping center in moscow, everyone was told that they should not go to the shopping center in moscow, why, as they knew, and the us does not explain anything to anyone, yes, we know moreover, we know that those terrorists went towards ukraine, and this does raise a real question. we know mo

together under the supervision of washington. to start a war in ukraine, says american economist jeffrey sachsirst the author called the us intention to expand nato to ukraine and georgia as a provoking factor in order to encircle russia in the black sea region. the second reason was the establishment of the russophobic regime in kiev in february 2014 , the expert pointed out. the shooting in ukraine began with the overthrow of yanukovych 9 years ago, and not in february 2022, as the us government, nato and g7 leaders claim. sachs noted. the key to peace in ukraine lies through negotiations based on its neutrality and non-expansion of nato, but ukraine is prohibited from talking, and this is unnecessary once again proves who has been inciting the kremlin for many years. the americans understand perfectly well, and the europeans too, that the kiev regime is a puppet regime; it does not make any decisions on its own. and therefore , it is most convenient to say that we are for peace, but look what ukraine wants to defend. great britain, france and germany it followed from the conversation that t

biden administration organized two provocations to start a war in ukraine, american economist jeffrey sachshe author named the first provoking factor as the us intention to expand nato to ukraine and georgia in order to encircle russia in the black sea region. the second reason was the establishment. the russophobic regime in kiev in february 2014, the expert pointed out: the shooting in ukraine began with the overthrow of yanukovych 9 years ago, and not in february twenty-two, as assured by the us government, nato and g7 leaders, ” sachs said. the key to peace in ukraine lies through negotiations based on its neutrality and non-expansion of nato, but ukraine is prohibited from talking, and this once again proves why who has been trimming the kremlin for many years. americans are great. europeans also understand that the kiev regime is a puppet regime, it does not make any decisions on its own, so it is most convenient to say that we are for peace, but look that ukraine wants to defend democracy, freedom, wants to fight to the last ukrainian, this is all frivolous talk, when in america they

russian official at all, but objectively, i think dmitry will confirm, a very respected expert, jeffrey sachssaid that now victoria will be his colleague and they will work at the same university, he said: “well, it’s probably better, well, at least it ’s like that.” that is not in the state department, here are his thoughts on the terrorist attack. yes, we know many facts. we know that the us knew about this terrorist attack in advance. we don't know how, we didn't know why, where? but this raises a very huge number of serious questions, and the fact that the us government has not clarified these questions simply shows everything. was launched when the united states hired jihadists to attack the state of sir in afghanistan, who were supposed to just calm down the situation when dragging the ussr into afghanistan, this is strategy, we know that the united states is in fact controlling the jihadists in the balkans in the caucasus region, this also leads to a huge number of very serious questions if the us knew. the united states had information, there is a history of such relations, if they di

operation against false flags, some experts are sure, according to the famous american economist jeffrey sachsthe united states has long forgotten what diplomacy is, instead trying to speak exclusively in the language of force. there is only the idea that everything should be the way the united states wants it, that’s all. everything turns out completely differently: washington is destroying one country after another, afghanistan, syria, ukraine, libya. the white house has no diplomacy, only covert operations or open war. this is the reason for the death of hundreds of thousands of ukrainians. if you don’t listen to common sense, hundreds of thousands more citizens will die, we are sure experts. it's time to negotiate. washington must radically reconsider the principles of its foreign policy, which is now based on interference in the affairs of sovereign states. emil mirsaev, news. yerevan is turning into a tool for implementing the dangerous plans of the west. official representative of the russian foreign ministry maria zakharova wrote about this on social networks. loud statements about the

biden administration organized two provocations to start a war in ukraine, american economist jeffrey sachsrovoking factor as the us intention to expand nato to ukraine and georgia in order to encircle russia in the black sea region. the second reason was the establishment of russophobia. regime in kiev in february 2014, the expert pointed out: the shooting in ukraine began with the overthrow of yanukovych 9 years ago, and not in february twenty- two, as the us government, nato and leaders of the g7,” sachs noted. the key to peace in ukraine lies through negotiations based on its neutrality and non-nato expansion, but ukraine is prohibited from talking, and this once again proves who has been inciting the kremlin for many years. americans understand perfectly well. germany has been on the territory of ukraine for a long time, and moreover, they are preparing provocations against russia. however, according to experts, such a leak put an end to the transfer of german taurus missiles to kiev. berlin does not want to further worsen relations with moscow. in a belarusian liberator is running thr

biden administration organized two provocations to start a war in ukraine, american economist jeffrey sachs is confident. the author named the first provoking factor as the us intention to expand nato to ukraine and georgia in order to encircle russia in the black sea region. the second reason was the establishment of russophobia. regime in kiev in february 2014, the expert indicated. the shooting in ukraine began with the overthrow of yanukovych 9 years ago, and not in february 2022, as the us government, nato and g7 leaders claim, sachs noted. the key to peace in ukraine lies through negotiations based on its neutrality and non-expansion of nato, but ukraine is prohibited from talking, and this once again proves who has been inciting the kremlin for many years. americans understand perfectly well. france and germany have been on the territory of ukraine for a long time and, moreover, are preparing provocations against russia. however, according to experts, such a leak put an end to the transfer of german taurus missiles to kiev. berlin does not want to further worsen relations with moscow