even controlled by the sbu, no nato expansion and two more conditions, the american economist jeffrey sacksxpressed his opinion. what peace talks on the ukraine conflict really should be my the view is still that the war should end through negotiations that the negotiations should be three-part no nato expansion crimea remains de facto in russian hands and something is being done with the donbass. i don't know it might be too late, but instead of turning it into ruins, it would be better to have even a frozen conflict, if not a full agreed result. i believe it is possible and i believe that the neo-conservatives of the united states still reject it because they still want to win. i don't i think that victory will come on the battlefield. as jeff isak noted, the price for europe and the whole world is quite high, the number does not want to accept european pseudo-values, as a result of the degradation of society in the power of the west, the american agenda continues to bend europe is putting pressure on hungary because of the law banning lgbt propaganda in schools . materials encouraging ge

but jeffrey sack the columbia university . he recently came forward and said that's not the case. the united states as overthrown dozens of governments. it definitely contributed to the overthrow of yanna, ko bitch. and i know this from the inside, not just from the outside. so i just want to be clear. i will bid, i know from top people involved in these issues is what i'm discussing right now. now the soros document not only matches the situation where kia is having you as weapons mild in suicide, being supplied with weapons by the united states. it also matches that the government of poland is very war mongering and hostile to russia. and furthermore, if you look at the situation, there are some estimates that the ukrainian casualty rate we may have seen over a 100000 dan. they are being carried out and people are dying to serve nato goal that yes has recently admitted. this is what's been said. shouldn't you put a yellows ne mind through today we occurring out nato's mission without the loss of their blood with but with the loss of ours. that's why they need to supply us with w

no nato expansion and two more conditions american economist jeffrey sacks expressed his opinion on what should actually be peace talks on the conflict in ukraine my opinion remains that the war should end by negotiating negotiations should be in three parts no nato expansion crimea remains de facto in russian hands and something is being done with the donbass. i don't know it might be too late, but instead of turning it into ruins, it would be better to have even a frozen conflict, if not a full agreed result. i believe it is possible and i believe that the neo-conservatives of the united states still reject it. because they are still hungry for victory. i don't think that victory will come on the field i was afraid of for europe and for the whole world is quite high. the question of expediency swedes are not ready to give up their laws for the sake of nato membership, this is evidenced by polls, the newspapers dages, nyhetter, 79% of those surveyed chose the option that the country should uphold swedish laws and principles, as the rule of law in relation to turkey, local residents are