jeffrey toobin is just that attack and attack of indemocrac when elected people contravene the judgmentother people died decades ago. these people can't even hear themselves millions of normal americans recognize this moment for what it nsis it's proof democracy destin exist. they can decide what they want for their communities through states their towns and the courts of these potentially respect right. it's called. self-government th legislature in texas realized i for months they pass laws homeless encampments in a sessions in schools protests that prevent emergency vehicles from writing down the road et cetera et cetera. a law of specific attacks of th people one and a lot are still on the books. >> that's not a bad thing how i that aa bad thing large affixes have to be exactly like california? the problem is that kind of thinking goes national, and greatly disempowers the people at cnn and there's overall so-called civil rights organizations that think they are in control. >> you might actually save several rites for the rest of us .ci >> radio show host with think lives in texas i

jeffrey toobin is back with us now.ing don't do this, and then the fda did it. >> it is. this is such a huge problem in the united states now. i know it for my own family. alzheimer's is a growing problem. it is the sixth leading cause of death in the united states. it is causing unending heartbreak for families. there has not been a new drug approved for alzheimer's since 2003 until this drug made by biogen was approved this year. but the question is, does this drug even work? and the answer, according to the experts, was no. and now patience are stuck with this terrible dilemma of do they ask their doctors to try this drug, or do they respect the experts and say it's not going to do any good anyway? >> so what should patients do? >> i -- you know, we have to ask dr. gupta about that. it's a really hard problem. because there is this movement in the united states beyond just this drug called the right to try. which is, you know, if a drug isn't actively harmful, let people try it. that seems to be the direction the fda

and jeffrey toobin here as well.alk about what this indictment kind of isn't but first just explain what it is and what is alleged to have happened here. >> so, i think it's fair to cat gore rise this as a speaking indictment. it has a story to tell. durham has a story to tell but it's very, very different from the narrow false statement charge that michael susman is being charged with here. as you mentioned he's a lawyer at perkins. he goes to the former counsel of the fbi, jim baker, has some information about a potential connection between a russian-backed bank alpha bank and a trump email server. never mind that that whole thing turns out to pan to nothing. but he goes to baker with this information. baker's recollection is that susman did not represent he was coming there on behalf of any client. problem for susman, his being entries have clinton foundation or general political advice. so that's a problem for him because he's now been charged with lying to the fbi. that's a crime. you can go to jail for that. pe

jeffrey toobin, the first patch of these subpoenas that was for people inside the white house.his new one is for outside who people who might have been planning or planning to stop the steal rally. what does that tell us about where this investigation is heading? >> well, the investigation is asking the right question. who planned this attack on our democracy? who authorized it? and who knew it was going to happen before the attack on the capitol began? these are all very good questions and they are unanswered to this point. the problem is will this committee be able to get these answers and i think one of the things that the trump forces have learned is that it's easy to run out the clock on congressional investigations and that is likely to be the strategy here. >> andrew, i want you to listen. this is congressman jamie raskin, what he said to ryan nobles about these new subpoenas that, here it is. >> do you think it's possible you're going to find there was more coordination there than we know about or one of these things where there is a bunch of people that came together a

people like jeffrey toobin feel fine.s his prerogative but whatever there he is lecturing us about roe v wade a sacred five four ruling that invented the right of abortion out of nothing. here you have a duly elected state legislature right now in 2021 contradicting the five unelected judges who concocted the right to abortion back in 1973 and jeffrey toobin is suggesting that is an attack on democracy, when elected people conthe, are, avein elected people who died decades ago. millions of normal americans recognize this moment for what it is. it's proof that democracy does still exist. voters can decide what they want for their communities, their states, their towns. and that courts will at least potentially respect that right. it's called self government. the legislature in texas has realized this for months now. they passed laws banning vaccine passports, homeless encampments, racial struggle sessions, block protests that prevent emergency vehicles from riding down the road, et cetera, et cetera. laws specific to texas

. >> joining me now, jeffrey toobin and wendy davis. senator davis, the governor did acknowledge that many women, as congresswoman ocasio-cortez don't know they're pregnant in the first six weeks. >> i agree with the congresswoman, that his comments were completely repulsive and absolutely unacceptable and not at all with the understanding of how mechb snstruating people's s work. when i was in the texas senate, we had the largest backlog of untested rape kits of any state in the country, over 20,000. i had to fight like hell to begin the process to start testing the backlog and to prevent a future backlog. that problem has still yet to be completely resolved although other legislative members have worked incredibly hard on it. so number one i want to challenge that statement. number two, in our state right now there was an article in the paper recently that rape crisis centers are afraid to refer their clients to abortion clinics for fear that they are personally going to be sued by one of these vigilante anti-abortionists under senate

the president and ceo joins us now along with jeffrey toobin.i appreciate you being with us. why did your client think it was an important step to stand up to this law by violating it? the doctor is used to being able to give his patients options. and with the texas law in place, he is having to turn most of his patients away. the option that's he has for them are untenable. needing to travel out of state which many cannot do even if there are means for them to be able to leave the state financially. and so he feels as a doctor who is providing care for years that it's important to challenge this blatant will you unconstitutional law that is creating havoc on health care in texas. >> he could lose his medical license? >> well, you know, today operation rescue is an anti-abortion rights group filed a complaint against him with the texas medical board. so he's putting many things on the line. that should not prevail. texas took the position in the supreme court. they can't enforce this law by any government agencies including the medical board. so

joining us to talk about all this is cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin. why do you think the supreme court hasn't enacted on this yet? >> this is a peculiar situation designed to create legal complications. because of the law berman just mentioned, it is not the state of texas that enforces the law the way it works in most states. the way it works in every state. it's the system of private enforcement, private attorneys general it's called and what this difficulty it's created is that it's unclear who the abortion provider should sue. usually you just sue the state government and the court issues an injunction on state government don't enforce the law. with no single enforcer of the law, there is this procedural problem that abortion providers have that it is unclear who they're supposed to sue. that's what's creating this legal tangle separate from the issue about the abortion law but the effect is that this law is now in effect and roe v. wade essentially does not exist in the state of texas and probably more in states to come. >> there is so much about

i want to bring in our chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin.mmittee. explain what specific information they can offer. >> the most important information they can offer is who organized this rally and who authorized it, and who knew, and who planned the violence that came out of it? obviously, there is nothing wrong with planning a rally near the white house with strong words spoken, but this turned into a riot. and the question is, who knew or who planned any sort of violence? but you know, this is a very good and appropriate investigative step. but there are tools to respond. chiefly, the fifth amendment. several of these witnesses may say i'm not cooperating because it implicates my right to self-incrimination. that will raise the question of whether the committee wants to give them immunity. that's a time consuming process. time is not on the side of this committee, whether it's the high level officials, the four around trump who were subpoenaed who may claim executive privilege. the fifth amendment issue here. the committee wants to move qu

cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin is here.estrictions on his activity or movements. >> because in the judgment of the medical professionals and the justice department he's earned it. he's been released most of time since 2003, 18 years. for the last five years he's been completely released, out in the community and the judgment is, of these medical professionals and he was found not guilty by reason of insanity, so they feel that he's not a threat to others or himself at this point so he's under no more supervision. >> i read that they said his mental illness is in remission. how do they know that. >> you never know for sure. but this is what they do for a living. saint elizabeths is a mental hospital. they make these sort of judgments. they're usually right. they're not always right which we hear about whether they're wrong. any sort of release like this is some kind of risk. but you know, this is been a long time. and he has been out in the public -- with free movement for almost 20 years now. so it is not really that big of

let's bring in chief political analyst gloria borger and jeffrey toobin. what did you hear and what did you think? >> i thought it was a very convincing explanation of what's wrong with the law. it was less convincing as a legal case. i think this is going to be a very difficult lawsuit for the administration to win. >> why? >> starting with the question of standing. you know, you can't just file a lawsuit because you don't like a law. the issue of do you have the injury in fact, how has the federal government been injured? you notice that attorney general garland mentioned several federal agencies he said were affected. i think the defendants in this case are going to say the injury, if there is any injury to those federal agencies, is too small and insignificant to merit the filing of a lawsuit. that's going to be a big challenge in this case. but the fact that the federal government is in this case is a big deal, and the justice department is doing what it can. the question is whether or not the courts will agree, and i think that's very much an open qu

and joining me now, cnn's chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin.nd cnn senior legal law enforcement analyst and former-fbi deputy director, andrew mccabe. he is also author of "the threat: how the fbi protects america in the age of terror and trump." gentlemen, good evening, good to see both of you. jeffrey toobin, the -- the first batch of these subpoenas was for -- was for people inside the white house. this new one is for outside who -- people who might have been planning or were planning the stop the steal rally. what does that tell us about where this investigation is heading? >> well, the investigation is asking the right question. who planned this attack on our democracy? who authorized it? and who knew it was gonna happen before the attack on the capitol began? these are all very good questions, and they are unanswered to this point. the problem is will this committee be able to get these answers? and i think one of the things that the trump forces have learned is that it's easy to run out the clock on congressional investigations, and that

. >> joining me now is cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and wendy davis, former texas state senatoribustered 11 hours against another restrictive abortion law back in 2013. senator davis, the governor didn't acknowledge that many women as congresswoman ocasio-cortez pointed out don't even know that they are pregnant in the first six weeks. i'm wondering what you made of his comments. >> well, i agree with the congresswoman that his comments were completely repulsive and absolutely unacceptable and not at all in keeping with the understanding of how menstruating people's bodies work. and i want to make sure that your viewers understand a couple of things about texas and its approach to protecting sexual assault survivors. when i was in the texas senate, we had the largest backlog of untested rape kits of any state in the country, over 20,000. and i had to fight like hell to begin the process to start testing the backlog and to prevent a future backlog. and that problem has still yet to be completely resolved, although other legislative members have worked incredibly hard on it. so nu

i want to bring in cnn's joan and jeffrey toobin. can you tell us about what the decision was that the supreme court has made here and remind our viewers about this texas state law and why people were so concerned about it? >> sure. good morning, kaitlan. i cannot overstate the magnitude of what happened last night by a 5-4 vote for women in texas, for constitutional rights nationwide and for the justices themselves and their relations with each other in a very bitterly divided set of opinions the justices let -- explained why they had not intervened the night before when this texas ban on abortions went into place. and as you say, remind our viewers that it's essentially a six-week ban on abortions. most women don't even know they're pregnant at six weeks. and the law in texas had an unusual enforcement mechanism in which state officials aren't the ones who are going to ensure this ban but rather private citizens have socially been deputized to report and bring a case against anyone who assists, aids and abets a woman with -- who is

joining me now former med ral prosecutor jeffrey toobin. blic warning coming from the justice? >> it's unusual for a justice to talk that way. they sometimes slip and talk in a little more explicit terms about what's going to happen in the court. but traditionally they really don't say much about the future. but i think, you know, she's just facing reality. the court by 5-4 let the texas law go into effect, which effectively bans abortion in the state. and there is this mississippi case which you mentioned, which is upcoming, which bans abortion all together in mississippi. that 5-4 majority looks like it's ready to change the law of roe v. wade, which women and men have expected to be the law for 50 years in this country. and she's just telling people, get ready. >> let's talk about -- you mentioned the mississippi case. the term is about to begin. what are the cases in the upcoming term that she's alluding to? the mississippi case is definitely probably top of mind. >> that's certainly the biggest one. and what makes that one even more con

. >> with me is jeffrey toobin. let's start where diane left off, which is there isn't criminal liability associated with this. this law allows strangers even to sue in civil court anyone who helps a woman get an abortion. how do you enforce this? >> i don't think anyone knows how it will work. we do know why the law was structured that way. the reason is that other states have imposed restrictions on abortion. they have done it by the state. the state has said you, abortion clinic, cannot perform an abortion at such and such a time. the state will punish you, shut your you down, fine you if you do. that means the abortion clinics can go to court against the state and get a judgment that says you can't do that to the abortion clinic, state of mississippi or state of alabama. that's how the court challenges have worked. this law has created a legal problem for the abortion clinics. who do they sue? how do they try to stop this law because there is no identifiable enforcer. >> so it's entirely designed to get around t

i want to get to cnn's chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and senior legal analyst laura coates. jeffrey, this is big news. the january 6th select committee targeting four of trump's top aides, going straight to subpoenas. what does that tell you about the investigation? >> well, it tells you that what they're looking at is what donald trump knew and when he knew it and what complicity he had in this riot. what it also tells you is that the democrats shouldn't get their hopes up that these four are going to testify because one of the things the trump administration taught the democrats in congress is they can defy congress more or less with impunity because they can tie up these subpoenas in court for months, and this committee does not have months. so even though these four, i think, have no real legal basis to refuse to testify, i would be very surprised if they actually did wind up testifying. >> yeah. so, laura, the committee wants documents, let's see, by the first week in october, and patel, bannon, scavino, and meadows appearing on october 14th and 15th. committee member ad

. >> it seems to me they cornered the market of fossil sets with jeffrey toobin. >> he's got to be nervoust this happened for one reason, because there was a push notification. so everyone's phones that we need to know about this. and when they saw dinosaur foreplayish there was at least a handful of women that got to go, hey, babe, dinosaurs were doing foreplay and start a fight with the man in their lives. there needs to be more of that. you guys not know what foreplay is? three women just shaked their head yes. >> this is a family show, cat. we don't need to go in that direction. we're concentrating. >> it's golf. it's golf. >> what's wrong with her? >> gutfeld: i have a theory -- if i were taking over cnn, i would jetson all of the news and do this type of stuff. they're terrible at news but not bad at some of the nonfiction stuff, history of the '70s, music of the south, the pilgrims invented sunshine. stuff like that. it's safer for them because they screw up the news. >> they have literally gotten everything wrong in the last six years, absolutely everything wrong. interesting they'

also with us cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin. doctor wen, i want to get your overall reaction to the president's new war on covid, this new push that he's making, this six-point plan. were you happy with what you've heard? >> well, it is about time for the president to hit re-set and to really put the blame where it should be, which is on the the unvaccinated. right now so many people who are vacci vaccinated are thinking we've been doing the right thing and acting responsibly but it is still not safe and do all of the things that we did if pre-pandemic times because of the one in four adults in america who have yet to receive one dose of the vaccine. so for the president now saying education, outreach, asking nicely, even pleading, it is not working. we're going to do vaccine mandates. it was a bit late for my taste. >> and i also think that president should have gone even further because one thing that i hope he did was to look at what france and the cities of new york and san francisco had done which is to tie vaccination to p

let's discuss with jeffrey toobin and laura coats. thank you both for joining. good evening to you. ions at six weeks and allows private citizens to bring suits against providers in anyone that seeks abortion. >> it very simple to explain. abortion will be illegal in texas, period. there is no abortion clinic. there is no abortion provider that will risk going forward giving anyone the opportunity -- any woman the opportunity for an abortion in light of this law. six weeks is a time that most women, many women don't even know they're pregnant. so it's effectively a ban on all abortions and this very strange provision of allowing private parties to sue is an attempt to insulate the state of texas from being sued to stop it. one reason why this is such a legally complicated situation is that there is no clear defendant in this case, and that's why the law was set up this way, and that's why in about 88 minutes, unless the court acts, you know, for the first time since 1973, abortion will be illegal in the united states -- in a state in the united states. >> so i don't want to over stat

. >> last time we were all mad at jeffrey toobin for self-care. >> if you do pellet on that's all theyo overrated. you need a bath bomb, greg. self-care. >> who takes a bath, you're sitting in your own dirty water. he wants to take a bath in new york city? if to drain the tub every five minutes because of your own filth. >> especially in new york, ther is a thumb of some teamster coming out of the faucet. >> we wills bring bring bring i and to this odd piece. living with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer. more time is possible with verzenio. proven to help you live significantly longer when taken with fulvestrant. verzenio + fulvestrant is for hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after hormone therapy. diarrhea is common, may be severe, or cause dehydration or infection. at the first sign, call your doctor, start and antidiarrheal, and drink fluids. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor about any fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. life-threatening l

joining me is cnn chief senior analyst, former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin and cnn supreme court reporter adrianna vogue. jeff, why is this significant? >> september 1st, 2021 i think will be seen as a major date in american history because this is the first time since january 23rd, 1973, the day roe v. wade was handed out, today is the first day that a state could legally ban abortion because the supreme court let this law go into effect. this is a major change in the law. yes, it is true that many states have imposed restrictions, have tried to limit the right to choose abortion for women, but this is the first time an outright ban has been allowed by the supreme court to go into effect. it is not going to be just texas if the supreme court continues not to step in because every other law in the many other red states that have been trying to ban abortion, they're going to pass copycat laws, and this is not the end of the fight. this is just the beginning of the end of roe v. wade. >> arianne, were you surprised the high court did not intervene? >> it's interesting because the c

joining me is jeffrey toobin. jeff, this is partially good news in terms of at least people are able to go to the courts now. it's not a total system but it's only about appobortion provider with planned parenthood and who they sued against them. is this for more than just them at some point in time? >> we have to see. the judge said this temporary injunction lasts until two weeks until september 17th but the judge will hold a hearing on september 13th about deciding whether to make it a permanent inju injunction. so this is certainly a win for planned parenthood but, you know, it may be of short duration and it's not clear how many organizations it will ultimately apply to, but look, a win is a win. that means planned parenthood can continue to serve women for the next two weeks without the fear that they had for the last three days, but i mean, as you're saying, the legal issue, the legal issues surrounding this law are very -- are going to be in the courts for quite sometime. >> i mean, you're operating and you

i actually already have one of them because jeffrey toobin sent me a prototype last year.round the house while playing music and delivering you drinks. like the other astras, it could cheat at the world series is. astro monitors your house for broken glass and alerts you to suspicious activities, you know, like a robot rolling around taking videos of everything. you nosy pervert. topic number two. celebrity chef -- has opened a new high-priced london restaurant serving an $840 steak. now we know where democrats are going to be holding their next maskless fundraiser. he became famous in 2017 for the way he put salt on a steak which is also what launched the career of liam hemsworth. the prices are as pretentious as the customers. the menu offers bourbon for $130 and a gold leaf tock a hawk steak for $850. tomahawk steak. former new jersey governor chris chris christie was happy to spend $840 on a single steak dinner, although he never went to london. that was at at an arkansas by's. we got the meats. topic number three. are are you tire of netflix and chilling? now you can

i want to get perspective now with cnn's chief legal analyst and former-federal prosecutor, jeffrey toobinered for 11 hours against another restrictive abortion law back in 2013. jeff, does the justice department have a strong case here? >> well, they -- it was certainly a powerful and persuasive case. that this law is outrageous, that it conflicts with the constitution. the problem is when you dig into the 27-page complaint, the issue is standing. the issue is does the justice department, under federal law, have the right to bring this lawsuit? because this lawsuit says nothing about the federal government. now, attorney general garland tried to make the case that it has an effect on federal agencies in texas. that may or may not be a persuasive argument to -- to the -- to the courts there. but -- um -- the -- the problem with this whole case from the beginning has been, procedurally, how to get the issue squarely before the court. the supreme court of the united states didn't address it when it allowed the court to go in -- it allowed the law to go into effect. this is an attempt to get

we'll be joined by texan cecil richard as well as cnn's jeffrey toobin who's long predicted this day would come. what makes new salonpas arthritis gel so good for arthritis pain? salonpas contains the most prescribed topical pain relief ingredient. it's clinically proven, reduces inflammation and comes in original prescription strength. salonpas. it's good medicine. >>> breaking news now on republican efforts to stymie the committee investigating january 6th and punish the two gop members of the committee. cnn has learned arizona congressman andy biggs is planning to send a letter to house minority leader kevin mccarthy this week. it would call on him to remove liz cheney and adam kinzinger from the republican conference. he's a big loyalist to the former president moo worked to overturn the election. congress mccarthy has level a veiled unmistakable threat against telecom and social media companies that cooperate with the committee. congresswoman serves on committee joins us now, and sits on the judiciary committee and chairs the house administration committee. thanks for being with

. >> i want to get perspective now from cnn chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin. and cnn political analyst, kirsten powers. so, jeff, you look at not only arizona, all these other states now taking their lead and conducting their own, you know, so-called sham audits or audits. i mean, this does seem to be the new way forward or one leg of the new way forward for republicans. just keep auditing, keep sowing doubt, keep sowing fear? >> and, you know, anderson, i try not to be an alarmist about this or anything else. but we have to really recognize how profoundly this is a departure from the american-political tradition. one of the out -- one of the rules of the game has been when the votes are counted, that's the end. you can have a recount which is an official process. but if that is the end, that is the end. and the idea that republicans are -- are basically asserting that any election, any close election that democrats win is, by definition, illegitimate and they will find a way to discredit it. that's something new in american politics. and it's -- it's -- it's

. >> let's discuss this with cnn chief legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin andthor of "the voting rights war naacp and the on going fight for justice." do you agree with justice breyer. >> well, of the three branchs the u.s. supreme court has the highest level of trust among the americans and it is matter of trust. his first book, i believe, also spoke of alexander hamilton and his recent book as well and the fact that alexander hamilton in this issue of trust is one that goes very deep. and so, i would look at jus it is breyer as someone who is saying he can't make a political move like retiring if it's going to be based on the fact that a president wants to put someone else in office that would make the supreme court look as political as the other two branchs and it would undermine the trusts he believes that has to be there in order for people to accept the ed sigss of the court. as they used to say, what army is going to make people actually decide that they're going to accept the decisions of this u.s. supreme court? and it's about trust. the people don't t

perspective now from cnn chief legal analyst and supreme court historian jeffrey toobin. what does that 5-4 split among the justices tell but not the fate of just this texas law should it wind up at the court again but also roe v. wade itself? >> well, it tells you that clarence thomas is really in charge of this court now. the supreme court works by seniority. and the chief justice is always senior even if there is a longer tenured justice in the minority. but he is now in the minority on abortion rights. and the seniormost justice in the majority was clarence thomas. so he will control the opinion if there is a vote on the future of abortion rights, which there will certainly be more of. there's a big mississippi case coming down the pike. and it is likely that this texas case goes back. clarence thomas is committed over and over again to overturn roe v. wade. he is the single most dominant justice of that view. but he is joined by samuel alito, who has also expressed the view as wrong. and donald trump promised to appoint justices who will appoint -- who will overturn

perspective now from cnn chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin.at 5-4 split among the justices tell you about the fate of not just this texas law should it ever wind up at the court again but also roe v. wade, itself? >> well, it tells you that clarence thomas is really in charge of this court now. you know, the supreme court works by seniority. and the chief justice is always senior, even if there is a longer-tenured justice in the minority. but he is now in the minority on abortion rights. and the senior-most justice in the majority was clarence thomas. so, he will control the -- the opinion if there is a -- a vote on the future of abortion rights, which there will certainly be more of. there is a big mississippi case coming down the pike. and it -- it is likely that this texas case goes back. clarence thomas has committed over and over again to overturn roe v. wade. he is the single-most dominant justice of that view. but he is joined by samuel alito who has also expressed as wrong. and donald trump promised to appoint justices who will point -

cnn chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin, joins us now. so, what does that mean?mean, anderson, you have to understand -- i think people have to understand just how bizarre and -- and really outrageous the situation is. texas passes a law that everyone, including texas, acknowledges is contrary to supreme court precedent. it is -- it is unconstitutional under the law as it exists now. but here it is, several weeks later, and no judge has yet ruled on -- on the merits of this case. and yet again, this judge seems in no hurry to do so. you know, the -- the -- the -- the justice department asked for september 21st. he said october 1st for this hearing but that's only the hearing. who knows when he is actually going to rule? >> and -- and the rationale i read was i think said something to the effect of, you know, there were serious legal questions involved in this and it deserves time to consider them. >> well, and -- and this is why the fault here really is with the five justices of the supreme court. what -- what the district judge here is -- is basically repeating,

let's bring in the former federal prosecutor jeffrey to toobin, along with the former baltimore city alth commissioner, dr. wen. author of a new book. jeffrey, what do you think these mandates are? are they going to be going to court? i assume they will be. but will they hold up in court? >> well, the lawsuits are certainty. first of all, we need to see what the regulation actually says. i think it is interesting that the biden administration is not putting them out right away. i think they want a few weeks to get companies to start creating the procedures so that this is almost afate complete when the regulation comes out. anyone who tells you with certainty about whether these laws will be upheld doesn't know what they're talking about because this is uncharted territory. yes, it's true that the 1970 law says grave danger can be addressed by the federal government. but that still raises the question of whether a vaccine mandate is within the gambit of the law. it also raises the question of whether the appropriate procedures are going to be followed. will there be something called n