jen jackson is a warrior spirit and a healing heart. they is able to tackle issues while never losing site of who she serves. the people and her planet. she will leave a huge hole in the department and on her team. within the department she has been a fierce advocate but she has not stopped there. jen understand that sum is bigger than the parts. she has shared her observations and suggestions with her peers outside of the program with the hope of improving the effectiveness and welfare of the entire department. jen has leaned into the work. the outcomes and design of each program she leads. she has lean across and everyone has known that her heart was always open for problem solving session. wnl the toxics team, jen has united its members through a shared commitment to rigorous science and deep human compassion. a respect for numbers and skepticism of paralysis of analysis. and how little we understand about impact of human activities on the world in which we live. jen's legacy is far and deep. ipm, flame retardents and antibiotic and

joining me cnn legal analyst joey jackson and legal analyst jennifer rogers. let me start with you, jen. your take on this aspect of the ruling? no stay. >> yeah, this is a terrible opinion. doj gave her an offrafr-ramp fo this. saying let's talk about the classified documents which there is no legal justification for letting trump have those back, no privileges, nothing. she still said no. you still have to stop. they put in an affidavit explaining the harm if they had to stop reviewing these documents. there's no contrary facts. judges are supposed to decide on the facts. the evidence is the affidavit. trump's teams put in no affidavit. she doesn't contest any facts but just says i'm not convinced. at the end of her opinion she tells us why, you have to consider the context and the context is it is the former president and that governs everything for her. >> what she does say is say the only thing i'm saying you can't do is use the content of these classified documents. you can't read out loud the documents to witnesses you question. you can't put the content of the documents before t