van jones, jennifer rogers, and carrie sheffield.or being here. >>> tense moments at some of the protests after the roe ruling. is violence becoming the default in political discourse? we just talked about some of it. that's coming up next. moderate to severe eczema still disrupts my skin. despite treatment it disrupts my skin with itch. it disrupts my skin with rash. but now, i can disrupt eczema with rinvoq. rinvoq is not a steroid, topical, or injection. it's one pill, once a day, that's effective without topical steroids. many taking rinvoq saw clear or almost-clear skin while some saw up to 100% clear skin. plus, they felt fast itch relief some as early as 1 week. that's rinvoq relief. rinvoq can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. serious infections and blood clots, some fatal, cancers including lymphoma and skin cancer, death, heart attack, stroke, and tears in the stomach or intestines occurred. people 50 and older with at least one heart disease risk factor have higher risks. don't take if allergic to rinvo

van jones, jennifer rogers, and carrie sheffield.ense moments at some of the protests after the roe ruling. is violence becoming the default in political discourse? we just talked about some of it. that's coming up next. frank is a fan of fast. he's a fast talker. a fast walker. thanks, gary. and for unexpected heartburn... frank is a fan of pepcid. it works in minutes. nexium 24 hour and prilosec otc can take one to four days to fully work. pepcid. strong relief for fans of fast. (man) [whispering] what's going on? (burke) it's a farmers policy perk. get farmers and you could save money by doing nothing. just be claim-free on your home insurance for three years. (man) that's really something. (burke) get a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. (dad) bravo! (mom) that's our son! (burke) we should. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ some people have minor joint pain, plus high blood pressure. and since pain relievers may affect blood pressure, they can't just take anything for their pain. tylenol® is the #1 dr

so i want to bring in our justice correspondent, evan perez and jennifer rogers. thank you so much.van, you start first, we'll hear from trump's involvement of the fake elector scheme. tell us more. >> that's right, don, the committee importantly is going to connect the pressure campaign that these officials in the state of georgia, in arizona personally withstood from the former president and his allies and send these fake electors that'll kept the former prosecute in power and perpetuate the idea of these crowds being brought to the capitol. they're trying to pull it all together and bringing it right to the former president and the fact that he was involved not only in that phone call he made that you played apart of to the georgia state officials but also he called and try to pressure people and white house officials try to pressure people in arizona to try to do the same. >> jennifer rogers, how do you think the committee will show this is a widespread cordinated platform, do thank you think they'll be able to make that case? >> i hope so, don. this is a piece of the puzzle tha

. >> joining me now is former federal prosecutor and cnn legal analyst jennifer rogers. jennifer, let's begin with the first witnesses, rusty bowers, the republican speaker of the arizona house of representatives who in so many ways was blocking illegal things from happening. he withstood this pressure campaign from trump, giuliani, ginni thomas, the wife of supreme court justice clarence thomas, he's expected to talk about stopping republican-backed bills that would have allowed the state legislature to overturn the results of the 2020 election. he got phone calls from trump. he got phone calls from giuliani. he got emails from ginni thomas. look at all that incoming he took and yet he blocked it at every point. what are you listening for specifically from him? >> well, so we know that the call to brad raffensperger, which we heard a little piece of, was recorded. so we heard that. we haven't heard a recording, i don't think, one exists, of these calls, and this pressure. it is going to be interesting to hear from bowers and his own words what was said, what was he told,

jennifer rogers, kasie hunt, appreciated it. thank you both. >>> cnn special coverage begins on cnn at 1:00 p.m. eastern. be sure to stay with us for that. >>> just ahead here, the uvalde school police chief now on administrative leave as a lawmaker in texas files suit demanding answers over what happened during that horrific mass shooting. he's going to join us next. if you have this... and you get this... you could end up with this... unexpected out-of-pocket costs. which for those on medicare, or soon to be, is a good reason to take charge of your health care. so consider this. an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan from unitedhealthcare. why? because medicare alone doesn't pay for everything. and what it doesn't pay for, like deductibles and copays, could really add up. even thousands of dollars a year. medicare supplement plans help by paying some of what medicare doesn't... and making your out-of-pocket costs a lot more predictable. call unitedhealthcare today and ask for your free decision guide. learn more about plan

jennifer rogers is a cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor. nnifer, thanks so much for joining me. first off, what did you think of thursday's prime time opening statement from the panel? >> i was really impressed, amara. it really exceeded by expectations. i thought they needed to present the new evidence they were talking about and set forth the clear, concise way, the attack on the constitution that trump and his allies perpetrated. i thought the way they used video, overlaying video of gruesome violence at the capitol with the president's words about how there was love in the air and it was peaceful, i thought was really, really compelling. >> sources told cnn that attorney general merrick garland and other justice department officials were watching the hearing to see what crimes if any they thought had occurred. did you see any evidence of a crime on thursday? >> we've been talking about this for months and months as evidence has trickled out, about what's been captured by the committee. and i'm not surprised garland and his folks are payi

. >>> jennifer rogers, cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor, and joan biskupic. jennifer, i wanted to start with you, i think there are a lot of people at home who are wondering this. does this ruling create an opening to criminalize travel to other states if you are seeking abortion services, whether it's the services themselves, or what about the criminalization potentially of medicine related to abortions that could travel to state to state or could be transferred state to state, is that possible? >> we know that in fact states are already moving to try to make those things criminal, the travel to other states. missouri has tried to criminalize abortion, if someone got pregnant within the state, no matter where they are when they have the abortion, and we know abortion pills are under attack as well. there are questions about the constitutionality of laws that try to prohibit people from traveling state to state. so i do think there will be legal challenges if and when states enact laws like that, and they are susceptible i think to successful legal challenges.

analyst susan glasser, a staff writer for "the new yorker" and we have with us cnn legal analyst jennifer rogers, former federal prosecutor. jennifer, let's start with you. one thing we heard over and over again yesterday is that people around the former president told him that the plan to use the 12th amendment to overturn the 2020 election was illegal and was likely not going to be looked at by the supreme court. they would likely vote against it, yet he went forward anyway. does that present any kind of criminal liability? what are the chances that doj might prosecute? >> it might, boris. we need more development of the facts and the doj hasn't looked into this, they will do that, they'll dig deeper into exactly what the president wasconversat this issue. if he knew it was unlawful to pressure mike pence to do that and did that anyway, it can be a conspiracy charge. >> one of the architects of this plan was john eastman, one of donald trump's attorneys. he told trump two days before the insurrection this plan is illegal, i want you to listen to what he had to say to the committee about this.

take on your wild world in style. ♪ >>> continuing our conversation now with jennifer rogers, abbey finkenhaurhefield. it's been heated. i want to take a moment to look at what everyday americans think. and the polling, again, has shown that americans, in general, thought that roe should stand with some caveats, that there should be some restrictions. a lot of people, when you talk to them about their feelings about it, it changes a little. but in general. so, do you think that this is the minority leading the majority? in other words, the supreme court has taken the side of the people in the minority when the majority of americans actually believe that roe should be the law of the land with the caveat of some restrictions on abortion. >> right and those restrictions are key. so, gallup has tracked this for decades. when you see there is a spectrum in term of intensity and propensity to support abortion or be pro-life, the longer the gestation period, the weaker the support for abortion becomes. so, once you hit about after the first trimester, it becomes a majority of americans who say they s

. >> let's bring in cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and jennifer rogers. was the chief justice roberts who in 2017 wrote that opinion in trinity lutheran and said you can't exclude religious schools from a grant to resurface playgrounds but he left for another day and that day is today this bigger decision. what does it mean for the country? >> this is part of a major trend and the larger subject is can the government fund religious schools? can taxpayer dollars go to schools that are openly religious? under the free exercise clause, we have parochial schools in this country. we have children -- parents can educate their children with -- under any sort of religious -- any religion they like. however, there is also the establishment clause of the first amendment, which said the congress cannot establish a religion and historically the court has said if there is government money going to religious institutions, including schools, that is a violation of the establishment clause. that idea is breaking down under the conservative majority. there are more and mo

cnn's ryan noble joins us and jennifer rogers. first the reporting here.g can't be ignored. what more are you learning about these e-mails? >> reporter: there is no doubt about that. the fact that this committee has the material in their possession ahead of what will be a month-long series of hearings of what they've uncovered raises the possibility we could learn more about the interactions john eastman had with the former president, himself, with members of the trump campaign team and what they were up to in their efforts to undermine and stand in the way of the certification of the election results and what the judge said in his ruling last night is of particular interest. because case he made is that the reason these e-mails need to be released. at least one in particular shows eastman was plotting a plan to circumvent the courts. it wasn't about putting up a legal argument to allow judges to decide yay or nay. he wanted it interpret as a criminal problem. that's one of the reasons the committee deserved to have access to these e-mails. we don't know h

joining me now is manu raju and jennifer rogers. they amassed a mountain, as they describe it. not all of which, t they think be addressed in the first of the hearings. >> the committee has a high bar here. they have been promising a lot. they have been investigating this for months. they have thousands of pages of documents. they have promising a vast majority of information about january 6th we haven't seen before. they are facing the challenge the fact that the american public is pretty divided relatively evenly about january 6th, in terms of culpability, and in terms of what they want to focus on. one of the challenges they have going forward, is convincing the public they are learning something new, changing the viewpoints on exactly what happened here. you can recall some high-profile hearings past that kind of floundered. whether it's robert mueller going before the house judiciary committee committee in 2019, when the democrats were interviewing him in relation to donald trump's efforts to obstruct the russia investigation. or the republicans going after the benghazi in

all right, jennifer rogers, jeffrey toobin, laura coates, thank you very much. >>> just ahead, we'll have much more on the u.s. supreme court ruling overturning roe v. wade and the protests taking place across the country tonight plus congress passes the first major federal gun safety bill in decades. here we go... remember, mom's a kayak denier, so please don't bring it up. bring what up, kayak? excuse me? do the research, todd. listen to me, kayak searches hundreds of travel sites to find you great deals on flights, cars and hotels. they're lying to you! who's they? kayak? arr! open your eyes! compare hundreds of travel sites at once. kayak. search one and done. think he's posting about all that ancient roman coinage? no, he's seizing the moment with merrill. moving his money into his investment account in real time and that's... how you collect coins. your money never stops working for you with merrill, a bank of america company. my mental health was much better. my mind was in a good place. but my body was telling a different story. i felt all people saw were my uncontrolled move

. >> jennifer rogers, run question is how broadly this impacts not just abortion rights but other rightsto abortion and no ore right. nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt or on precedents that do not concern abortion. there are better than me, many rights like a right to privacy that are not referenced at all that people have come to enjoy and believe are part of their lives today whether that's contraception or interracial marriage. is that true in practice when these issues are likely coming to court? >> no. first of all, you have the rights we have been discussing that are based in the right of privacy they have dismissed contra contraception, the right to do sexual acts in your own home but you have other things that are not enumerated and the court said enjoy constitutional protection. maybe most obvious being yesterday's decision in the gun case. nowhere in the constitution does it say you have a right to an individual to carry a weapon outside of the home and yet they have found that is a constitutional right protected and there are other examples. it's just,

joining me for more on this is legal analyst jennifer rogers, former federal prosecutor.arges that have already been brought. it requires that they try to overthrow the government or interfere with the workings of government by force. so by force is the key phrase here. you're not just talking about perhaps the plot to put in the fake electors or to -- these other schemes that happened in the leadup to january 6th, but by force. the proud boys, the oath keepers, these are the people who came armed and had plans at least in the oath keepers to have the cue, the quick reaction forces outside of d.c. to bring in bigger arms if need be. they actually assaulted police officers. they broke down the barriers. that's where the by force comes in. that's important. you have 20-year maximum sentence with this count. it's the most serious one the doj can bring. >> doj also brought the same charges against the oath keepers. in the indictment yesterday it noted there's a meeting between the proud boys leader and the head of the oath keepers in a d.c. parking garage on january 5th. duri

. >>> let's bring in legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jennifer rogers. good morning, we know that there was a violent assault on the capitol. that part should be stipulated. it now seems the committee has a different job and the job here is to connect the dots to the effort to subvert the election that started way before january 6 to what actually happened that day. how do lawmakers make that connection? >> you're right, that is their task and it is not an enviable one. i think they have to do a few things. one is they promised us new information about this plot and they have to bring that. they really do have to give us information we've never heard before so that people continue to tune in. secondly, to make that happen, i think that they need to parse out the information. they can't give us everything in one fell swoop. they need to kind of tease what information is coming so people won't turn away and stop paying attention. but the most important thing they need to do is connect the dots. they have to make sure that people know that there is a clear

. >>> i want to bring in jenner the -- jennifer rogers, a former prosecutor. >> they have acted, doj has charged someone with contempt of congress. that's important. i think what paula said about the distinction between this case and the mark meadows case is a big one for doj. but they did go ahead and charge someone despite that person having been part of the executive branch at the time of the events in question. so i think that's a big step forward. and has a lot to do with the fact that, of course, this was a complete thumbing of the nose at congress here. i mean, peter navarro didn't even attempt to cooperate or get himself a lawyer or ask for extensions or mile a privilege log. he did nothing. that makes it fairly easy for doj to bring this case, and should impact, by the way, any cooperation that navarro may decide to bring to the grand jury subpoena that he received from doj. that may now encourage him to not thumb his nose at that subpoena as well. >> you said it was a pretty easy case for them to bring against navarro. how quickly could it move? >> i think it will move fair

discuss, republican strategist doug high and cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jennifer rogerspolitics of this and also what they can prove or try to prove here. what evidence do they need to establish to create at least the possibility of a criminal referral to the department of justice? >> well, jim, they can make a criminal referral based on their own conclusion that there's criminal liability here. so, they're not really shooting for a particular burden of proof standard. but, of course, if they do get into criminal court, we'll be looking for proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard known to law. they're really going to want compelling proof. i have to say, we're expecting new evidence, but even from what they've showed us so far in the drafts that have come out along the months, we have proof of this long-standing, widespread conspiracy. >> doug, you speak to gop operatives, voters all the time. is this investigation so far, and will the next step of nationally televised hearings of what they promise to be or will be new information here, is it substantively

here to help me break it all down is cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jennifer rogers.ve heard so far, what do you think has been the most impactful? >> well, certainly i think testimony before yesterday's testimony, i think that some of the earlier hearings had more impact in terms of potential criminality that the doj is listening to. but yesterday had some good nuggets too. it is a little different because the doj is already investigation gaying fraudulent slate of electors, but we got good tidbits about comments from rudy giuliani for example that i think that the doj may already know, but certainly they will be paying attention to if not. >> part of what the committee did yesterday was to try to tie the former president directly to this plot to put forward the fake slates of electors. and we heard from ronna mcdaniel, the chair of the rnc who confirmed this. take a listen. >> what did the president say when he called you? >> essentially he turned the call over to mr. eastman who then proceeded to talk about the importance of the rnc helping the campaign gather thes

we have lots to talk about as i'm joined by jennifer rogers, former congresswoman, and conservative commentatorrry sheffield. lady, ladies and gentlemen so much for being here. it is an incredibly emotional night for a lot of people on both sides of the aisle. i am going to start with you, jennifer. in roe versus wade, the justices said that abortion was a constitutional right. now the justices are saying it is absolutely not a constitutional right. it is now up to the states. is this the first time that the supreme court made a decision saying something was constitutional and has taken that back? >> well, it's the first time that the court has affirmatively recognized a constitutional right that it says is new or just newly discovered. so, in roe they said there is now a constitutional right to abortion, grounded in the right of privacy. that is the first time that was said. now 49 years later they said, when we reaffirmed it again and again and again across all these different supreme courts, we were wrong. we didn't mean it. we're taking it back. it's the first time that has ever happened. >

jennifer park with rogers behavioral health, and has an office in walnut creek. >> i think a lot of usin this never-ending cycle of stress. is there a way to break that cycle? >> one simple tool or strategy for dealing with stress is to be willing to be able to check in on yourself and to be able to increase your self-awareness, to say, hey, let me take a moment here. what i need right now? a glass of water? do i need to go to the restroom? do i need to take a walk around the block? maybe i just need to take a deep breath before i start this next meeting, or before i started this task. having a lot of these little moments of checking in on yourself can actually really reduce your stress each day. dan: good advice. for kids and teenagers dr. park says strategies are largely the same but with parental support, since kids often need help figuring out and getting what they need. how do you know if you are overstressed? signs to watch out for include trouble eating or sleeping, increase in irritability, fighting with people, essentially, lower frustration-tolerance. liz: we have all been th

rogers received a bachelor's degree from northeastern university. dr. jennifer mcdonald is they see -- the senior advisofor health to the secretary of veterans affairs. dr. mcdonald held several high-lel roles at the department including senior advisor to the deputsecretary, chief consultant to the deputy under secretary for health, lead executive for the implementation of physician act and dirtor of clinical education -- innovation in education. dr. mcdonald is a family medic in -- practicing family medicine physician and a veteran. she served as a white house fellow and advisor to the secretary of the u.s. department of homeland security. she seed 11 years in the minnesota army national guard and it deployed in operation iraqi freedom earning aronze star. she received her bachelor's degree from the college of saint benedict and her md from the university of minnesota and completed her residency ucla. stephanieiller is the direcr of officers and enlist personnel management and an advisor for senior officer matters in the offices of the under secretary of defens

cnbc's kate rogers spoke to one teen and some of the businesses that are benefitting from the teen' worker demand. >> thank you guys so much. >> when jennifer sutton opened her small business, guest house juicery in park city, utah, last year, she turned to teens to fill the hiring gap. she has two teen workers between ages 15 and 17 making between 12 and $14 an hour, plus tips, more than double the local-minimum wage. it's worked out so well, she is looking to hire three more this summer. >> and then, i send an e-mail and let's set up time to talk. >> her teams work hard but also know what they want. >> i think because we foster a pretty social high-vibe environment here, that is appealing to them. however, it does not mean that there is an option to pay them less or dump more hours on to them they are coming in they are looking for work. but they're -- they are making asking in what they are looking for. they want flexibility. they want to be able to take summer vacations and they know they can get competitive pay so there's been something that's been very apparent >> reporter: at the east coast wings and grills location, teens were key a

jennifer griffin on that for us, thank you. >> john: while the president looks to put a stop to his predecessor's policies at the border, one senator is saying expand them, specifically title 42. kansas senator roger should be broadened to help fight the deadly wave of fentanyl to american families. senator, good to talk to you. you said to the health director, i think you should expand title 42 in order to help combat the fentanyl across the border. she said there's no more health emergency, we don't need title 42. listen to what she said. >> the question of title 42 that was posed to me is, is there a public health emergency that should bar people from coming into the united states. we now have, as of april 1st, when i commented on this, we now have the tools, the tests, the vaccines and the therapeutics available. our hospitals are not full, everyone -- most people in this room are not wearing a mask. no longer public health emergency. >> john: no longer a public health emergency in the context of covid. you say a clear and present health emergency because of fentanyl, explain. >> that's right, john. fentanyl poisoning is an epidemic killing more young adults than covid is, than anything else h