when you ran against jeremy corbyn to be you ran againstjeremy corbyn to be leader, you said, look mell?— ip. is it still? i want to do stuff. you know- -- — ip. is it still? i want to do stuff. you know... and _ ip. is it still? i want to do stuff. you know... and you _ ip. is it still? i want to do stuff. you know... and you can - ip. is it still? i want to do stuff. you know... and you can do - |p. is it still? | want to do stuff. | you know... and you can do stuff ip. is it still? | want to do stuff. - you know... and you can do stuff is a local mp. so, you know, we are able to do stuff, to get investment in our town centres, we are able to do stuff to try and solve individual problems and things like that. but you know, to be able to change things on a grander scale, to stop kids across the countryjust slipping into poverty... i think it's about getting a labour government, isn't it? , , government, isn't it? maybe. maybe one da . government, isn't it? maybe. maybe one day- as — government, isn't it? maybe. maybe one day. as well _ government, isn't it? maybe. maybe one day. as w

look, both brexit and our leader, jeremy corbyn�*s leadership, were big factors.them, i think, was a feeling among a lot of people in towns like ours that labour was disrespecting them and that the party sort of disrespected them on things like security. they didn't think we had a leader who would keep them safe. they didn't think we respected the big institutions of the country, of the issues around patriotism. but they also thought that the second referendum was disrespecting the result of the referendum, and i think that was damaging. and yet people listening to what you said about brexit will say, hold on, keir starmer was the guy who wanted the second referendum. there was the cooper amendment which bore your name, which was about stopping a no—deal brexit, which some interpreted as an attempt to scrap or scupper brexit altogether. have you done enough work to say to those voters, sorry? i think we got a lot of things wrong and i think a lot of people got things wrong. i obviously had said i thought we shouldn't have the second referendum, that it wasn't the

because many of the planks, the pillars that he ran the 2019 general election on, it�*s brexit, jeremy corbyn that the conservative coalition is fraying and it is not easy to continue to bind these two quite different sorts of constituencies together, as we�*ve seen tonight. constituencies together, as we've seen tonight.- we've seen tonight. lewis goodall. _ we've seen tonight. lewis goodall, thank _ we've seen tonight. lewis goodall, thank you - we've seen tonight. lewis goodall, thank you for - we've seen tonight. lewis - goodall, thank you for sharing your thoughts. goodall, thank you for sharing yourthoughts. let�*s goodall, thank you for sharing your thoughts. let�*s park our election coverage there and move on to other news. the us senate has passed a gun control bill — the most significant firearms legislation in 30 years. the new bill includes tougher background checks for buyers younger than 21 and billions in funding for mental health and school security. the reforms fall short of the demands of gun control this is not a cure all full —— for all of the way gun violence affects our

johnson [indiscernible] we have that left tail risk that we had a couple years ago, when we had jeremy corbynn charge of the labour party. that is why you are seeing a more muted reaction in markets monday. tom: marcus, i will let you finish that point. the challenge to boris. marcus: generally when you see a leadership challenge, it is a very disgruntled, in this case, all affections of that party. but that is proving much harder to come back from. to answer your question, this will not be resolved immediately, but the impact on markets is much less than it could have been. tom: do you equities maintain their relative ability to act as a safe haven? do do you want to be increasing your exposure to equities in this environment? marcus: you look at the sector composition, very much exposed to defensive. but defenses are performing in this environment, with energy being one. on the flipside, they have very little exposure to tech, and consumer discretionary. remember that u.k. valuations are significantly below, even despite the moves we have seen today. tom: and you talked about that valuation

keir starmer served underjeremy corbyn, starmer served under jeremy corbyn, i starmer served underjeremyam personally not sure they are there yet, so will be difficult. — not sure they are there yet, so will be difficult, and conservative mps say they— be difficult, and conservative mps say they want to keep boris and keir in place. _ say they want to keep boris and keir in place, they believe boris still has a _ in place, they believe boris still has a chance of beating sir keir in the next election. whether he can is a different— the next election. whether he can is a different matter, it will be a pretty— a different matter, it will be a pretty vicious election campaign like indeed they all are, but, yes, for them — like indeed they all are, but, yes, for them to— like indeed they all are, but, yes, for them to be thinking right now, now is— for them to be thinking right now, now is the — for them to be thinking right now, now is the time to replace boris johnson. — now is the time to replace boris johnson, the question leads to, who is going to _ johnson, the question leads to, who i

back in 2012, let me remind you of labour's by—election success, jeremy corbyn, 12.7% swing, exactlyelection. the element of course but this is hugely significant for the labour party and i'm so proud we can present that confident labour party utterly focused on the voters. that's what i wanted to achieve and this is evidence we are on course for a labour government. but deflecting to you as a protest this time could be a lack of enthusiasm for boris johnson, not enthusiasm for you. fin johnson, not enthusiasm for you. on the johnson, not enthusiasm for you. q“! the back of that swing i'm afraid that argumentjust the back of that swing i'm afraid that argument just doesn't the back of that swing i'm afraid that argumentjust doesn't carry through. that argument 'ust doesn't carry throu~h. ~ . ., , ., through. what led voters here to move away _ through. what led voters here to move away from _ through. what led voters here to move away from boris _ through. what led voters here to move away from boris johnson? | through. what led voters here to - move away from boris johnson? listen to

back in 2012, let me remind you of labour�*s by—election success, jeremy corbyn, 12.7% swing, exactly but this is hugely significant for the labour party and i�*m so proud we can present that confident labour party utterly focused on the voters. that�*s what i wanted to achieve and this is evidence we are on course for a labour government. but deflecting to you as a protest this time, could be a lack of enthusiasm for borisjohnson, not enthusiasm for you. 0n the back of that swing i�*m afraid that argumentjust doesn�*t carry through. what led voters here to move away from boris johnson? listen to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and i think there| is a loss of trust. the element over the years i have voted conservative. i now we are retired, stable life, i think we need something done with the economy. some believed borisjohnson behave badly but nonetheless they remain loyal. i am not into him at the moment but on the light pink is the better of the two. how did labourwin? some of the leaflets reminded people the previous conservative mp was now in prison. they also campaign

brexit has gotten done and jeremy corbyn is out of the picture.hey had in 2019 is very broad but not coherent and to some extent since 2019 the government has muddle through without providing clear answers as to what its vision and philosophy is and i think a lot of that stems from boris johnson because i don't think he's got it clear philosophy or vision but there are more fundamental problems for the conservative party to the lease. a lot of this is very personal and a sense that conservative mps don't trust boris johnson.— trust boris johnson. what number would ou trust boris johnson. what number would you be _ trust boris johnson. what number would you be looking _ trust boris johnson. what number would you be looking out - trust boris johnson. what number would you be looking out for - trust boris johnson. what number would you be looking out for at i trust boris johnson. what number l would you be looking out for at nine p.m.? it’s would you be looking out for at nine .m. ? �* , ., would you be looking out for at nine .,m_? �* , ., ., would

individual policies, they were popular, but they didn't trust them when they were attached to jeremy corbyneader. very interesting, thank you for bein: leader. very interesting, thank you for being patient. _ leader. very interesting, thank you for being patient. we _ leader. very interesting, thank you for being patient. we are _ leader. very interesting, thank you for being patient. we are going - leader. very interesting, thank you for being patient. we are going to. for being patient. we are going to talk to sir roger gale, conservative mp, in a moment. iam not sure talk to sir roger gale, conservative mp, in a moment. i am not sure who mp, in a moment. iam not sure who i'm going to to mp, in a moment. i am not sure who i'm going to to now. you have to say the name again? i think we are going to talk to a gentleman called lord marland. can you hear me? you are on bbc world as well as bbc news, i wonder if he could tell our audience around the world a bit about yourself so we know where you are coming from?— yourself so we know where you are coming from? well, i was a minister in the cam

instead of all sorts of obstacles, there were two in england, jeremy corbyn, who, together with the kier author of the so-called universal grammar, that is, a person who tried to find common things in all languages ​​and find these structures. he, as a scientist, received recognition not for politics. but precisely for logic, for the philosophy of language, and so on. and this glory e, which came to him already at the declared age at one time. she gives him the opportunity to speak. that's something for what he just said, he is any other. could be in jail. could be defeated by various repressions and so on. well arrest us omsky it. well, the gut of a tank. it seems to me absolutely everyone, yes, although they do not have the same way as arresting anyone. yes , well, here. i think that if the ukrainians included the habermass on the peacemaker website, apparently, their omsky will now be included in the peacemaker website , uh, so to speak. the leading philosopher of our time, well, what he said about the fact that huge censorship and a huge propaganda machine that has already surpassed

statesman who would argue sensibly. and called for negotiations instead of there were two in england, jeremy corbyned, there in soviet times, the very height of the cold war was there. if stalin made some kind of statement, he was broadcast in the west by the mass media, the agency was printed there and broadcast. yes, there brezhnev was handed over to gorbachev. i no longer speak. yes, here it is now. just nothing to russia, only comments from that sides. yes, that is, no russian view is presented at all in the western information field anywhere. and in no way is it we represent the western information field. we are talking about it, there is absolute censorship. it's just a block on everything that comes from russia, how they can make some decisions. it doesn't look very much like an eagle in 1984, the well-known well-known novel the ministry of truth, however, they rewrote everything all the time, but the essence remains the same. same other viewpoints not represented. and by the way, in this novel. uh one of the hero asks a question. how so? eh? we have to make important decisions. is n’t it ne

in that election the country was at threat from jeremy corbyn. now? it seems like a - million votes. do you think he would do that now? it seems like a long i do that now? it seems like a long time ago. i do that now? it seems like a long time auo. ~ time ago. i think he will deliver for this country _ time ago. i think he will deliver for this country and _ time ago. i think he will deliver for this country and i _ time ago. i think he will deliver for this country and i think - time ago. i think he will deliver for this country and i think he l for this country and i think he would go on to win a general election with an ambitious programme for continuous improvements to the health service, housing, help with the cost of living challenges. he is getting on with the job. i think he has a call later this morning with president zelensky because we have war in europe and we have responded very strongly to that because of the prime minister and his understanding of the importance of this. it is all about delivery, that is what i am focused on, that