jeremy hill, what do you make of this reversal?> i certainly think we entered a new regime of at least medium term volatility and lower range. that's pretty obvious. maybe we harken back to what warren buffett said which is if history was a guide to investing, than librarians would be the richest people in the room. i'm not certain that goes longer term because we have big catalysts coming up. that fed meeting, the oil patch. there is a lot in the future that we have to think about more than just what's happened over the last couple of days. >> it does seem like the market is reacting to itself. it had such a violent move. moved faster than any fundamentals did. sentiment seems fragile here. the question is what's going to put in any kind of a believable floor for the time being? >> we thought we had a believable floor this morning, right? things are very contemporaneous now. i think probably the biggest push positive we could have right now is the fed in september, comes out and says no rate hike. until we get to that point, i thi

. >> jeremy's a rookie at the pike's peak international hill climb. 136 hair-raising turns up a 14,000untain that would give any driver goosebumps. >> it's indescribable. >> cameras mounted inside and outside jeremy's car are recording every second. >> i think it's known actually as being one of the most dangerous races not only in the country but probably the world. >> jeremy's girlfriend robin is 3,000 feet up the mountain where it's cold and it's been drizzling on and off for the past hour. >> we could see most of the track. we got a pretty good spot. >> in the thin air at 12,000 feet, the time trial is going well. seven minutes in and three to go, jeremy and his co-driver are on pace to finish in third place. jerl jeremy downshifts around a hairpin curve and accelerates. this section of the course is called devil's playground. it's about to live up to its ominous name. jeremy drives 80 miles an hour into the next turn. he steers to the left but his wheels aren't grabbing. they never will. >> the front end just basically slips out. it's one of the most frightening things i've experi

. >> now, let's go to cherry hill's favorite song jeremy pe ders. >> you know, i did cover clinton forives me a little jersey. >> i guess that's why they give you cherry hill. >> governor, good morning, you won re-election the way republicans want to win the white house, that's by capturing a significant percentage of the hispanic vote. what do you think donald trump's being in the race does to the party's chances of winning over his pangs? >> i don't think anything jeremy. not only did i win a significant amount of the hispanic vote. i won the hispanic vote. we got 51% in 2013 and 22% of the african-american vote and female candidates we got 56% of the female vote. >> that is the way we have to try to win across the country. i don't think any one particular candidate has an effect on the party unless and until that candidate is the nominee of the party. until that time all you are is someone who is aspiring to lead the party. but we don't decide who leads the party by who leads in the polls in august. the year before the elect. we decide who leads the party when someone gets the numbe

more money for energy and jeremy said that all of these alternatives are now becoming cheaper and cheaper, well if that is true, then why is the wind industry swarming on capitol hill to renew their tax subsidy. why is the solar industry determined that they have to have their tax subsidy? it is because those kinds of power are not competitive and one of the reasons is because the wind doesn't blow all of the time and the sun doesn't shine all of the time. for example texas has a lot of windmills but in texas in the summer, which is when everybody has their air-conditioning on, the windmills with blowing 2% to 3% of the time. now in the other seasons, they are 30% of the time, perhaps. but when they really need the power in texas, they have 2% of the entire mix coming from wind mills. so this is not -- this is not the future. windmills are very old technology. we need to get off of these dead end technologies and on to letting the free market innovate and produce real solutions to our problems. >> you've heard the thoughts of our guests so far. they continue with us as we talk about the plan released by the administration earlier this week. if you want to ask our g

more money for energy and jeremy says that all of these alternatives are becoming cheaper and cheaper -- well, if that is true, then why is the wind industry swarming on capitol hillw their tax subsidy? why is the solar industry determined that they have to have their tax subsidy? it is because those powers are not competitive and one of the reasons is is because the wind does not blow all the time and the sun does not shine all the time. for example, texas has a lot of windmills but in texas in the summer, when everybody has their air-conditioning on, those windmills are blowing about 2%-3% of the time. in the other seasons they are 30% of the time perhaps, but when they really need the power in texas, they have 2% of their entire mix coming from windmills. this is not the future. windmills are very old technology. we need to get off these dead-end technologies and on to letting the free market innovate and produce real solutions for our problems. host: they will continue as we talk about this plan released by the administration earlier this week. if you want to ask questions you can do so on the line. republicans -- (202)-784-8001. democrats -- (202)-784-8000. i