jeremy pollock lafco executive officer. before i jump in may be speak briefly to your mention of the previous mou and the history of the rep with lafco and the sfpuc. and i have been look back at historical record of lafco studies going back to the early 2000's. a lot was a lot of technical studyos acquisition of pg and e's infrastructure and with the community choice aggregation program that shifted to the lafco focus and -- yea. original mou created with our two agencies was about the design of that program and launch of the community choice aggregation clean power sf. a possess that took long and more sweat and tierce than anticipated and i think the period of strife between the agencies and between the board of supervisors and mayor's office and sfpuc and it is exciting now hearing the updates from mr. hines a noncontroversial success now and seeing it as an established program and a part of the fabric of san francisco and contrasting that with pg and e's struggles across the state and yea. i think it is -- negotiating

executive officer jeremy pollock this is an item tied to the other mou the first stretch in moving forward on that work to issue a request for qualifications and i think with all of the moving pieces on the mou and with your decision to continue the mou to a special meeting it might make sense to continue this as well. the i the speak border patrol to the original intention for conducting a request for qualifications was based on the plan to have the mou defined basic topic areas with the specifics study topics to be worked out. and the idea was we would request qualifications for the specific topic areas whether decarbonization, battery storage and we would create prequalified list of consultances that had skills to work on this and once we refined the topics we would negotiate a contract with the contractor that had the best skill set for that. i think as part of the on going discussion about what -- whether we will define topics in the mou or what level of flexibility we will have on that it might make sense to do a request for proposals. and forgive me get nothing prosecute curement ve

jeremy pollock lafco executive officer.e i jump in may be speak briefly to your mention of the previous mou and the history of the rep with lafco and the sfpuc. and i have been look back at historical record of lafco studies going back to the early 2000's. a lot was a lot of technical studyos acquisition of pg and e's infrastructure and with the community choice aggregation program that shifted to the lafco focus and -- yea. original mou created with our two agencies was about the design of that program and launch of the community choice aggregation clean power sf. a possess that took long and more sweat and tierce than anticipated and i think the period of strife between the agencies and between the board of supervisors and mayor's office and sfpuc and it is exciting now hearing the updates from mr. hines a noncontroversial success now and seeing it as an established program and a part of the fabric of san francisco and contrasting that with pg and e's struggles across the state and yea. i think it is -- negotiating this n