john conyers of michigan, and the influential chairman of one of its subcommittees, new york's jerrold nadler it came after scathing testimony given by a republican lawyer who says she sued acorn for voter registration fraud in pennsylvania. >> i would sincerely request that congress investigate these allegations as i've outlined against acorn. >> may i ask the chairman consider such a hearing so we can get to the bottom of this? i mean -- >> let me just say that i will certainly consider a hearing on acorn if i ever hear any credible allegations. >> well, wait a minute. this is a member of the bar here that got a successful partial injunction against acorn. >> the chairman makes a good point and we certainly will consider it. >> that's what all chairmens around here say. i suppose that's pretty instructive and encouraging. >> weeks later conyers confirmed there would be no hearings and his explanation surprised steve king from iowa. >> chairman conyers announced we wouldn't hold any hearings because the powers that be have decided there will not be an investigation to acorn. >> who was he ta

john conyers of michigan, and the influential chairman of one of its subcommittees, new york's jerrold nadlerfter scathing testimony given by a republican lawyer who says she sued acorn for voter registration fraud in pennsylvania. >> i would sincerely request that congress investigate these allegations as i've outlined against acorn. >> may i ask the chairman consider such a hearing so we can get to the bottom of this? i mean -- >> let me just say that i will certainly consider a hearing on acorn if i ever hear any credible allegations. >> well, wait a minute. this is a member of the bar here that got a successful partial injunction against acorn. >> the chairman makes a good point and we certainly will consider it. >> that's what all chairmens around here say. i suppose that's pretty instructive and encouraging. >> weeks later conyers confirmed there would be no hearings and his explanation surprised steve king from iowa. >> chairman conyers announced we wouldn't hold any hearings because the powers that be have decided there will not be an investigation to acorn. >> who was he talking abou

john conyers of michigan, and the influential chairman of one of its subcommittees, new york's jerrold nadler came after scathing testimony given by a republican lawyer who says she sued acorn for voter registration fraud in pennsylvania. >> i would sincerely request that congress investigate these allegations as i've outlined against acorn. >> may i ask the chairman consider such a hearing so we can get to the bottom of this? i mean -- >> let me just say that i will certainly consider a hearing on acorn if i ever hear any credible allegations. >> well, wait a minute. this is a member of the bar here that got a successful partial injunction against acorn. >> the chairman makes a good point and we certainly will consider it. >> that's what all chairmens around here say. i suppose that's pretty instructive and encouraging. >> weeks later conyers confirmed there would be no hearings and his explanation surprised steve king from iowa. >> chairman conyers announced we wouldn't hold any hearings because the powers that be have decided there will not be an investigation to acorn. >> who was he talki

john conyers of michigan, and the influential chairman of one of its subcommittees, new york's jerrold nadler by a republican lawyer who says she sued acorn for voter registration fraud in pennsylvania. >> i would sincerely request that congress investigate these allegations as i've outlined against acorn. >> may i ask the chairman consider such a hearing so we can get to the bottom of this? i mean -- >> let me just say that i will certainly consider a hearing on acorn if i ever hear any credible allegations. >> well, wait a minute. this is a member of the bar here that got a successful partial injunction against acorn. >> the chairman makes a good point and we certainly will consider it. >> that's what all chairmens around here say. i suppose that's pretty instructive and encouraging. >> weeks later conyers confirmed there would be no hearings and his explanation surprised steve king from iowa. >> chairman conyers announced we wouldn't hold any hearings because the powers that be have decided there will not be an investigation to acorn. >> who was he talking about? >> only two people, either

john conyers of michigan, and the influential chairman of one of its subcommittees, new york's jerrold nadlerand it came after scathing testimony given by a republican lawyer who says she sued acorn for voter registration fraud in pennsylvania. >> i would sincerely request that congress investigate these allegations as i've outlined against acorn. >> may i ask the chairman consider such a hearing so we can get to the bottom of this? i mean -- >> let me just say that i will certainly consider a hearing on acorn if i ever hear any credible allegations. >> well, wait a minute. this is a member of the bar here that got a successful partial injunction against acorn. >> the chairman makes a good point and we certainly will consider it. >> that's what all chairmens around here say. i suppose that's pretty instructive and encouraging. >> weeks later conyers confirmed there would be no hearings and his explanation surprised steve king from iowa. >> chairman conyers announced we wouldn't hold any hearings because the powers that be have decided there will not be an investigation to acorn. >> who was he