if jerry bush with her, we, as doctors would like to be left alone by politicians, we want them to stop using us for their purposes or both sides of doing it. piet, shit, or chef ski fears they're restrictive. abortion rules in poland will have floss, think consequences, place could be the boys who they shows. there are women with who now are afraid to get pregnant, which is a job they think. what am i going to do when i find out my thetis has an illness or gene damage your school? so that's why they decide not to get pregnant at all. says that the vehicle with mothers against your prenatal examinations because they fear the results above even equal. but the debate in poland continues with pro life activists demanding father restrictions and criminal charges against people selling abortion pills. the activists who sell the pills or any money on that, and this is what we want to stop, we want to stop this business of ah, business of deaf. you could say claudia could still cannot come to terms with what's going on in poland. she's hoping for a political change soon, otherwise she says she

ho, worked for the justice in ot 2005 and after a clerkship with jerry smith on the fifth circuit and asked -- a stent on doj in the bush 43 administration. after clerking he became a partner at a law firm. he also served as solicitor general of texas and he is now on the court of appeals for the fifth circuit. we are a little bit front loaded on early clerks for the boss. we will try to call -- cover all 30 years as best as we can. this panel is about methodology, how one should do constitutional interpretation, among other things. if you are thinking about the best way to do that, two main competing approaches, one is originalism. randy barnett gives a pretty good working definition that originalism is a school of thought under which the meaning of the constitution is fixed -- was fixed when the constitution was enacted or ratified. that is a proposition about how language works. that next meeting should constrain what interpreters do in deciding cases in the present day. it is a normative claim about how we all as judges should decide cases. of course, justice thomas, is the world's leading practitioner of originalis