my name is jerry dradler. the c.s.a. operating budget has increased 100% to $19 million. the f.t.e. count has grown from about 50 f.t.e.'s to 68 f.t.e.'s, a 35% increase. what additional services are the citizens of san francisco receiving from the increased level of funding, and are the services the ones outlined in append appendix f? reporting on the funding by department is no measure of out come of value. you have to look at the input, payroll hours, and look at the output audits. citizens of san francisco deserve this information. why is this psimportant? -- [inaudible] >> -- and capital planning support are not requirements of appendix f. enumerated requirements of appendix f are not being addressed. i'd like to present my requirement of appendix f requirements and whether the . c.s.a. is addressing these? i have been told the annual audit work plan is risk based. this risk analysis had never been presented to cgoboc, and there's no way of determining how the proposed audit plan addresses known risks. i recommend the c.s.a. prepare the recommended input-output analysis and pre

my name is jerry dradler and i've been working to reduce the reduction of unpermitted housing demolition in san francisco. i've filed two whistle blower complaints on the failure of the department of building inspection to enforce demolition without permit. in both instances, the department of building inspection issued demolition permit after the property owner removed the building, so it's clear the building removal met the building code criteria for a demolition without a permit. d.b.i. failed to enforce the penalty enumerated in the section 1038.3. if the penalty on the n.o.v. was consistent with the building code requirement, a very basic compliance audit. one of my complaints was referred to the city attorney, and the second complaint, 655 alvarado was closed. when i sent an e-mail inquiring on the status of 655 alvarado, the response i received, and this is a quote, appropriate action was taken and the whistle blower program now considers your complaint closed. the answer is incompetent consistent with the mission of the city services auditor, which is to promote transparency and