but obviously we have jerry mander districts and it depends on where you are from. we call it had whack a mole program. on different days they are afraid of different things. if you are talking about teams they are afraid of saying we will encourage every 14-year-old to go out and have sex if we make an iud available even though there is no evidence that is true. or we are afraid we are condonni condonni condonning sex outside of marriage or afraid certain methods of contraception may act as abortion methods or the argument obtained on different days is there is a lot of fear. >> i think the fact that mark udall lost the senate in colorado after talking about reproductive health and bee being attacked by the denver post, which is a liberal newspaper, as being a one-issue candidate is a big element in colorado. don't you think, andrea? >> i do. and i think it is fascinating he was beat by a republican who went out of his way to show he supported contraception and went out of his way to say it was valuable for women. he wanted to propose over-the-counter contraception

purpose, and the bad purpose was politics, as paul alluded to they are saying there is no partisan jerry mandering claim out there, not withstanding paul's efforts to the contrary, andy was saying it was a defense to a short challenge. if you come in saying i didn't create this black district because of race, i created it because of politics which is the case because it helps republicans in adjacent districts, that is not good. so paul is arguing that politics have nothing to do with it and race have everything to do with it. while litigants in some cases, including one of mine they might take, argue it is all politics and no race. i don't think the shelby county argument has any legs. they will judge a legislatures interest in terms of the interest that would confront the legislature when they enacted the law. not pretent they can be put in a time machine and figure out shelby county would be reversed. the other part i like about paul's argument is they are taking a good approach to section five pre-clearance. you could saw they didn't need the underpopulate to get the section-5 preclearance. you