so there are several take aways because the supreme court said these appear to be racial jerry manders and sent it back to the lower court but had stronger language in justice brier's opinion for why they believed that many of these districts violated this doctrine. one take away is that you have to have plaintiffs who live in the districts that you're challenging. it was not clear, even at the supreme court level whether the plaintiffs had met that particular goal. they said that we have one of the groups was a member organization and they said we have mbs in all the districts. and nearly all the districts. as justice scalia points out in dissent. nearly all isn't all. maybe they don't have some in some of the districts that's challenging. on remand that have to cure that effect. the big take away from the case is that it's going to go forward and impact a number of other cases that are pending now. cases out of texas and virginia for example that also allege discriminatory intent. in those cases again before alabama was decided, the state the come in in both cases to say well to avoi