will jerry nadler be able to move the needle? stay tuned. nsley: he says that nadler has denied that request. so we'll see what happens. so, as the confirmation for the omb director is hanging in the balance, the lady has been nominated, neera tanden, you her her name a lot, key senators are coming out against her after a lot of her tweets have been revealed. she had hawk tweets. she deleted 1000 of those tweets recently, tweets attacking gop senators and attacking bernie sanders and used to work for hillary clinton. once said bernie sanders was russia's choice. lisa murkowski, did you see the tweet about you? no. i was surprised to learn she had tweeted. all these individuals say they will not vote for here are a few of them. senator collins, senator romney, senator portman, senator toomey, senator joe manchin who is the democrat, senator capito. she will need one republican to say i will vote for her. brian: joe manchin said i will not vote for her. she is totally irresponsible. she is pundit on the outside. she blisters everybody. how did

we're dropping a letter to congressman jerry nadler to open up a congressional hearing on this matter. >> you allege the greater new york hospital association which donated to democrats 1.15 million that went to the governor election in 2018 you think cuomo drafted those provisions with them top of mind. >> they drafted the bill and bragged that they wrote the bill, put it in the budget last minute. mind you, he didn't have to do that. he had emergency powers to do this on his own. he did it at the last minute to implicate the senate and assembly in a toxic bill he knows was bad. that's why we need to hold it accountable. many of our colleagues voted against it. it is time to go back and give justice for these families whose rights as patients and residents were taken away from them by cuomo. >> democrats in albany big talk stripping the governor of his emergency pandemic powers. so far all talk. 15 times republicans have tried to do this and democrats haven't come along with it. what are you telling your colleagues? do you believe they will at least do that? >> i'm confident my leade

because at the beginning of the committee meetings, jerry nadler said that would not be necessary in his committee. take a look. >> in the spirit of national unity and national pride, which i know we all aspire to a greater extent at the beginning of each meeting, the chair or one of the designees of the chair will have the opportunity to lead us in the pledge allegiance. we are all aware that in these times, it's important for the country to see members of congress working together on some things and i recognize myself to speak in opposition to the amendment. it is unnecessary. the house begins every day with the house of the pledge of allegiance. we are covered by that. there is no necessity to say it twice during the same day. >> sean: it's interesting. nadler is still awake for this hearing. here with the reaction, the author of the best selling book "firebrand" former congressman matt gaetz. all right, jim jordan, i will take the bait. who is next? who is next? >> well, it could be anyone and americans don't want to live in fear. we have this thing called the constitution, bill

jerry nadler has the i gave at the office for patriotism. in these times when our country needs to see republicans and democrats can do something together that we can come together in some ways, i just thought it would be a nice gesture before debating some admittedly divisive issues. corey bush is also on the judiciary committee. new member. she have opposed my amendment to say the pledge of allegiance because it was a symbol of white supremacy. i thought it could be something unifying and you see from either mockery or incendiary comments about race or an unwillingness to spend an extra 15 seconds recommitting ourselves to the flag we face democrat opposition to that effort. >> harris: you've been very transparent where the power lies right now. this president had promised, congressman gaetz, there would be not just bipartisanship but there would be unity around certain ideas. is that happening? >> i'm hopeful for it but i didn't hear nancy pelosi make the same commitment. i hope the president listens to republicans on everything from the

as the member designated by chairman jerry nadler, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairman nadler will vote yea on h.res. 85. as the member designated by chairman gregory meeks, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairman meeks will vote yea on h.res. 85. as the member designated by chairwoman maloney, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote yes on h.res. 85. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on h.res. 85. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. deutch will vote yes on h.res. 85. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house res

adam schiff and jerry nadler blewitt because adam schiff never testified. i don't believe donald trump incited a riot by saying they should peacefully march down to the capital. i believe that when they didn't allow the police to stop black lives matter, a lot of the people that owned those businesses were horrified financially, scared of seeing all these people, and the police were told to stand down. host: ok, thanks. sean: a lot to break down. thank you for watching the show. i appreciate it. i would love to get rush limbaugh on, he is dealing with some personal and health issues. i appreciate you watching. democrats made it clear on the day donald trump was inaugurated they were going to impeach him. they were searching for a reason to impeach him. if you look at the process of the second impeachment, there was a seven hour floor discussion in the house of representatives. there were no hearings or witnesses, which was unprecedented. they did it in seven hours. for those folks who watch washington journal and c-span regularly, you know washington does n

. >> that's how it works with nanci pelosi as speaker and adam shiv and his ship-show and jerry nadler and his judiciary committee. the reason why all the senators will be acquitting donald trump is because this is unconstitutional. it is because they realize the american public, the average person is saying to themselves why are we doing this impeachment? he's not even in office anymore. why aren't we working at getting our kids back into schools? they're looking at the facts. they're seeing that this was preplanned. the f.b.i. warned about this ahead of time. the president gave a speech. they're saying you can't assign any type of metaphorical characterization on the president saying "fighting like hell" when you look at his actual words, he's calling for his people to go there peacefully and patriotically. on the facts and also as you've been pointing out on hypocrisy, people are seeing the insurrection of autonomous zones in seattle taking over police precincts or attacking a federal courthouse, throwing molotov cocktails at police cruisers. the double standard has the average pers

like jerry nadler, we do it first thing in the morning.that for people to decide how they feel about that. meanwhile and by the way, matt gaetz himself, you said democrats don't like matt gaetz. a couple of hours on the fox news channel and listen. >> cori bush is on the judiciary committee a new member and she said she opposed my amendment to say the pledge of allegiance because it was a symbol to white supremacy. goodness gracious, it either mockery or incident they sedentary comments about race or unwillingness to spend an extra 15 seconds recommitting ourselves to the flag, we face opposition to that effort. >> sandra: nl video and sound has emerged of apparently democrats mocking matt gaetz for doing this and talking how silly. >> which could make him look better really. >> sandra: i suppose you could say that in the fact checking website with alexandria ocasio-cortez and her account what happened when she hunkered down in her house during the capitol riots. the fact-checking website apparently being painted weird by some who don't li

. >> we're also kong guess member jerry nadler to officially open a congressional oversight hearing onalso, house oversight republicans want to subpoena governor cuomo to testify on the covid nursing home coverup on fatalities in senior facilities. former staffer of governor cuomo, lindsey boil lynn says governor cuomo sexually harassed her. governor cuomo is denying this. let's welcome back the governor of west virginia, governor jim justice. great to see you again. should cuomo testify before congress? >> i think so. liz, i would say wholeheartedly. he has himself a 18-carat dog smith going on, that is all there is to it. at the end of the day, when you think you're the biggest and baddest, you're about to get your you know what whipped. what it really boils down, liz, i have so often seen you with janice dean. i've seen her, the pain on her face. all the time she is such a happy person an everything. but with her mother and father-in-law dying with everything, that that is tragic beyond belief. the governor of new york has himself a real problem now. he absolutely should testify. ev

adam schiff, eric swalwell, jerry nadler, and most of the democrats said crazy conspiracy theory things when they were in congress, impeaching president trump and attempting to delegitimize his time in office as a consequence of the russia hoax. marjorie taylor greene got 75% of the vote. that's more than -- >> sean: that's more than you! >> that's more than almost every member of congress. it is a dangerous precedent when we disrespect the voters, and that is really what the left is trying to do. they are saying the people of america don't matter. it's the decision-making process inside the beltway. so tonight, the republicans decided to keep liz cheney. tomorrow, the democrats will boot marjorie taylor greene from her committee's. i think both decisions reinforce the power of washington, and it only encourages me to try and go out in america and get people focused on the changes we need to make in both parties so that the voters are respected. >> sean: i leaned out the "hannity" conservative agenda, that is what i focus on, limited government, more freedom, low taxes, less bureaucracy

review, the investigation that cuomo called for, christi, essentially we are hearing from congress jerry nadlereople saying, you know, the attorney general should hire someone independently to investigate this. this isn't the governor's call when it comes to this specific issue. a lot of turmoil there. >> no doubt. thank you. >>> cnn has learned that former acting director of national intelligence may be considering a run for california governor. efforts to recall democratic governor gavin newsom move forward. >> california's lieutenant governor says any republican hopes to take the foregovernor' office, that's a fantasy. >> i believe that he does not deserve to be recalled. but i am also very hopeful that kansa californians will recognize this is built on a fantasy that they can slip a republican governor into the bluest state in the country. >>. >> reporter: the fuel for these mailers, for the volunteers trying to recall california's governor frustration. >> i reached my final straw when i lost my job for the third time in november. >> reporter: stacey edwards works in restaurants, an industr

meanwhile at the house judiciary committee republican matt gaetz got chairman jerry nadler on the recordthe pledge of allegiance. >> i think it would be nice if in the spirit of national unity and pride we all aspire to do to a greater extent, the beginning of each meeting the chair or one of the designees of the chair will have the opportunity to lead us in the pledge of allegiance. >> i recognize myself the speech and the opposition of, it's unnecessary. >> shannon: it's necessary to have a late night where they are under way. discuss with national republican senatorial committee chairman rick scott of florida. welcome back, senator. >> good evening, we are going to be here late, late, late and early the morning. >> shannon: to explain to people what's happening here, normally if you're going to have a $2 trillion covid bill, you have to go through a number of series of votes and go through a 60 vote protocol in the senate to get it moving. but there's something being done by democrats to move it with just more majority votes. that leads to tonight. what does it say to you about the ab

should have listened to their own words of the past i leave you with the wise words of congressman jerry nadler. the effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters we must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our system of government or our constitutional liberties against the dian threat and we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the american people there must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other such an impeachment will produce the divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions the american people have heard the allegations against the president and they overwhelmingly oppose impeaching him they elected president clinton they still support him we have no right to overturn the considered judgment of the american people mr speaker and the case against the president has not been made. there is far from sufficient evidence to support the a

adam schiff, eric swalwell, jerry nadler, and most of the democrats said crazy conspiracy theory thingsen they were in congress. impeaching president trump the vote to punish green is another manifestation of the distrust between republicans and democrats on capitol hill after the january 6th riot, we have the threat from where. can. republicans took another vote on whether to keep congress woman liz cheney as their third ranking member. she received overwhelming support after being criticized for voting to impeach donald trump. ray pogon fox news. ktvu fox two news at five starts now another mass vaccination site in the bay area scheduled to open tomorrow. this one will be the largest in the state when it begins running at full capacity. officials say it will offer up to 10,000 appointments every day. the mass vaccination site will be held at the mosconi center in san francisco. good evening. i'm julie julie haener. i'm frank somerville mosconi center will be added to the list, including the open call. see him as places that are hosting mass vaccination sites. mosconi center alone can

adam schiff, eric swalwell, jerry nadler, and most of the democrats said crazy conspiracy theory thingsongress. impeaching president trump the vote to punish green is another manifestation of the distrust between republicans and democrats on capitol hill after the january 6th riot. we have the threat from. can. republicans took another vote on whether to keep congress woman liz cheney as their third ranking member. she received overwhelming support after being criticized for voting to impeach donald trump. ray bogan, fox news, this is ktvu fox two news at six. coronavirus vaccine supply problems continue to plague the state and bay area counties. and now some health experts are suggesting a different approach to improve the distribution problems. would we save more lives? if we got more people? their first doses and then gave people their second dose is a little bit later. dr robert walked her from ucsf is emphasizing that the second dose is necessary. but he says that delaying it in order to inoculate more people could be more beneficial to the overall population. good evening, everyon

house judiciary chairman jerry nadler has denied republican matt gaetz's request to begin each meetingy begins each day with it. gates has said he asks for the pledge each meeting in the spirit of national unity and pride. a former prisoner from a chinese internment camp is telling her story about the horrific things that occurred to uighurs in china. correspondent benjamin hall has her firsthand account but, be warned, this account includes some disturbing details. >> a survivor, a survivor the secretive chinese camps for over a million uighur muslims have been detained. safely in america she is telling her story, hoping to save others. >> we are humans. buff 9 way they torture these girls and even boys it's like we are animals. >>' she was living in northwest china hoping to become a nurse. she says she was grabbed off a road and thrown into a camp. her only crime was her religion. for a month she endured forced reeducation. learning about the greatness of china and president xi hour after hour when she was released because of an illness. a few months later she was taken back in and

. >> and i think the key, this is certainly troubling, we're hearing from key democrats, jerry nadler he must go. the key thing is, as rahm said, these women should be heard, we should listen to them, they should have the environment and the space to speak. also, the notion of due process for the accused but what we're seeing is, instead of isolated allegations potential for a pattern of behavior. which is very disturbing. an aggressive investigation needs to ensue. >> 30 seconds. >> listen, i agree with what everybody said about people and women in this instance. but i also want to caution, lot of people jump to conclusions on brett kavanaugh and what happened there. i think we need to hear from governor cuomo, we need to hear from him, he needs to have an opportunity to say what happened from his -- >> independent investigation? >> absolutely. >> thank you all very much. >>> coming up, more on the murder of jamal khashoggi. we'll be right back. khasoggi. they changed how the world fights cancer. blocking the pd-l1 protein, lets the immune system attack, attack, attack cancer. pd-l1

would like to take this opportunity to thank the speaker of the house, nancy pelosi, and chairman jerry nadler, for bringing this legislation to the floor. and to mr. bishop, the ranking member of the subcommittee. and to the senate for introducing a companion bill in the senate. the puerto rico recovery, disclosures act of 2021, eliminates a double standard currently facing puerto rico. under u.s. code and federal bankruptcy procedure, any conflicts of interest or even the perception of such conflict between those working on the bankruptcy and the debt are required to be disclosed. however, a loophole in the current law prevents this current requirement from being extended to the people of puerto rico. in 2016, congress passed the puerto rico oversight management and economic stability act, or promesa, to set up an orderly bankruptcy process to restructure its debt, stimulate economic development, and put the island on a path to financial recovery. this bill will extend current u.s. law, requiring disclosures of conflicts of interest to puerto rico and thereby improving transparency and resto

should have listened to their own words of the past i leave you with the wise words congressman jerry nadler. >> the effective impeachment is to overturn the will of the voters not to remove a president from office except to defend our system of government or constitutional liberties against the dire threats we must not do so without the overwhelming consensus of the american people. there must never be a narrowly voted impeachment supported by one of the major political parties and opposed by the other. such the impeachment will produce the divisiveness and bitterness in politics years to come and call into question the very legitimacy of the political institutions american people for the allegations against the president and overwhelmingly opposed to pete on - - impeaching him elected president clinton and still support him we have the right to overturn the considered judgment of the american people. mr. speaker, that case against the president has not beenst made. far from sufficient evidence to support the allegations even if proven true do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses.

this was led by jerry nadler and it was a long report about the prescription to essentially regulate and even dismantle these companies. so there is agreement on the right and the left. i think it's one of the reasons these big tech companies are going after conservatives and trying to curry favor with the democrats in power. >> bill: at least desantis is trying to do something about it. >> dana: in terms of the idea i want to get your thoughts about jeff bezos stepping down as the ceo of amazon. is this huge news? i wasn't shocked. >> not shocked. he is stepping down from the ceo job on top. he is worth the bigger -- again, he is going out at a time when there will be greater scrutiny on amazon because of its power, because of its size as a monopoly in terms of antitrust and regulation. the man who was running the amazon web services and it pulled the plug on parler. amazon has a history of steam rolling rivals. small companies that sell their products on amazon's platform basically my word, stealing the idea, recreating the product and selling it as a private label product. they cl

i leave you with the wise words of congressman jerry nadler. >> effective impeachment is to overturn the popular vote of the voters . must not overturn it and remove the present of the office except of the constitutional liberties against the dire threats. msr do so without an overwhelming consensus of the market people. they must never be a narrowly voted impeachment. what impeachment supported by 104 major political parties in the post by the other. session impeachment will produce the divisiveness and bitterness for years to come and will fall into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions. the american people have heard the allegations against the president . and they overwhelmingly oppose impeaching him. they elected president clinton and they still support him and they had no right to overturn the judgment of the american people. mr. speaker, the case against the president has not been made. and there is far from sufficient evidence to support the allegations and the allegations even if proven true, do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses. >> mr. speak

i leave you with the wise words of congressman jerry nadler. >> the effect of impeachment as of overturn the world of popular voters. except to defend our system of government or our constitutional liberties against the dire threats. we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the american people. they must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by any of our major political parties and opposed by the other. such an impeachment will be divisive and will call to question the very legitimacy of our political institutions. the american people have heard the allegations against the president had to have imposed impeaching him. they elected president clinton and still support him and they have no right to overturn the judgment of the american people. mr. speaker, the case against the president has not been made. there is far from sufficient evidence to support the allegations and the allegations, even if proven true do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses. mr. speaker this is clearly a partisan railroad job. the same people who today tell us we m

there is no adam schiff in this or jerry nadler, thankfully for democrats. nager for the democrats. he will try to make a very cogent argument but in the end, it is a losing argument, stu. it will not win. we already know 45 republican senators voted previously to dismiss the case because they believe it is unconstitutional to try to remove from office a president who is already left office. stuart: i would suggest watching this program. we intend to be entertaining. gregg jarrett, thanks for joining us. come back and see us soon. good stuff. >> sure, stu. stuart: this is a big story emerging here. it is about reddit. they have raised a ton of money in their latest round of funding. know reddit very much at the center of this market frenzy we saw around gamestop. how much money are we talking about. susan: $250 million. that doubled reddit's valuation at $6 billion. they were only worth half of that a year ago. what a difference 12 months makes. they're doing smart thing. raising cash with high interest in the company. gamestop, wall street saga shows how inf

i leave you with the wise words congressman jerry nadler. >> the effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters. we must not overturn an election and remove a president office except to defend our system of government or constitutional liberties against a direct threat and we must not do so without anoverwhelming consensus of the american people . there must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or impeachment supported why one of our major political parties and opposed by the other. such an impeachment will produce the divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come and call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions . the american people have are the allegations against the president and the overwhelmingly opposed impeaching him . they elected president clinton. they still support him. we have no right to overturn the considered judgment of the american people . mister speaker, the case against the president has not been made . there is far from sufficient evidence to support the allegations and the allegations, even if proven

it's why that long clip by jerry nadler was so inapitant in my mind as well. >> who seeks recognition? mr. castor is recognized. >> mr. president, members of the senate, good afternoon. it has been my great privilege in the past couple weeks to lead this outstanding team of lawyers and dedicated professionals. one of the most difficult things in leading such a talented group is deciding who is responsible for what and the strategy and the order in which we will present our evidence. you have heard on the important of the first amendment and the importance of due process of law. and because i had the opportunity to set out the schedule, i decided that i would take the last substantive part of the case for myself. you can take that two ways. the first is perhaps the best is that it is almost over. the second is that perhaps you have to wait another hour for it to be over. the reason why i chose this section, and believe me it was a very difficult section to make. i thought the arguments presented were outstandingly researched thoroughly vetted, and wonderfully and articulately presented

i take the democratic party -- nancy pelosi, adam schiff, jerry nadler, chuck schumer -- those peoplehould be charged with malfeasance of office. from the date president trump was elected they did everything they could to try to come up with some way to impeach him. and now as he has left office they are trying to impeach him. these people have abused their office in an illegal manner and told so many lies. i'm not saying president trump is a perfect individual. none of us are. but these people are not using their office in a proper way. host: and the charge of incitement, doesn't hold or not? -- does it hold or not? caller: i don't think it does. i think the congress and senate have to take a lot of responsibility for what happened on january 6. the people are fed up with these moneygrubbing, dishonest people that come on tv and spout lies and words against logic all the time. the people are fed up with them. host: bill finishing off his round of calls concerning the impeachment trial. you will have a chance to do so in the last half-hour of the program. we will talk about was going

large technology companies that were a threat to the democrats based on that 450-page report from jerry nadlerhreat a few months ago. if they're on the side of the left and the democrats, i guess it's all good. maria: yeah, it's all good if your competitor is getting censored, i guess. lee, what do you make of this proposal from ron de santis and is this going to have an impact? you know the world we're living in with all of the censorship, lee. how are you reading this from speaking to and polling various constituents? leland: i'm reading this as a -- lee: i'm reading this as a move to make a symbolic move. he's tackling some of the issues that are most important to americans across the board and in florida you're seeing he's tackling covid in really, really smart ways, that's most important to people. he's tackling the economy by having low taxes and continuing to keep things open. he's doing that. and now he's addressing this idea of everybody should have a voice. we're going to protect free speech. and so while i agree with dagen, this might not have real legs or real impact, it does symbo

adam schiff and jerry nadler blewitt because adam schiff never testified.'t believe donald trump incited a riot by saying they should peacefully march down to the capital. i believe that when they didn't allow the police to stop black lives matter, a lot of the people that owned those businesses were horrified financially, scared of seeing all these people, and the police were told to stand down. host: ok, thanks. sean: a lot to break down. thank you for watching the show. i appreciate it. i would love to get rush limbaugh on, he is dealing with some personal and health issues. i appreciate you watching. democrats made it clear on the day donald trump was inaugurated they were going to impeach him. they were searching for a reason to impeach him. if you look at the process of the second impeachment, there was a seven hour floor discussion in the house of representatives. there were no hearings or witnesses, which was unprecedented. they did it in seven hours. for those folks who watch washington journal and c-span regularly, you know washington does not do

unanimous consent to introduce an exchange of letters with house judiciary committee chairman, jerry nadler, providing for discharge of the portion of the bill within the jurisdiction of the committee on the judiciary. i thank mr. nadler for this courtesy. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. levin: i urge support for this legislation, and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from michigan reserves. the gentlewoman from north carolina is recognized. ms. foxx: thank you, mr. speaker. and i thank the gentleman from michigan for yielding time. mr. speaker, i rise today in strong opposition to h.r. 447, the national apprenticeship act of 2021, which impedes the ability of businesses and employers to fill in-demand jobs. legislation deserves a proper, thorough, and bipartisan examination, which is why the house has long established procedures to do just that. these procedures respect the majority and minority and ensure that both sides are represented. democrats are ignoring these procedures and bringing this bill straight to the floor, steam rollin

i leave you with the wise words of congressman jerry nadler. >> the effect of impeachment is to overturnt overturn an election and remove a president from office except for our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. and we must not do so except in an overwhelming consensus of the american people. there should never be an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other. such an impeachment will produce a divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions. the american people have heard the allegations against the american president, and they willingly oppose to impeaching him. they elected president clinton. they overturned him. we have to right to make judgment of the american people. mr. speaker, the case against the president has not been made. there is enough evidence to support the allegations, and the allegations do not rise to the level of impeachment. the person last year had just admitted lying to congress in a proceeding. the americans are watchi