what i would like to speak about is finding 4 following what jerry woois spoke about and finding four requires that the variance will not harm property or improvements in the vicinity. the zoning decision does not really address this requirement. adjoining properties and improvements are completely ignored. the railing have stood alone for nearly 90 years. the fence stands within 18 inches of the adjoining property and it's improvement. but the zoning administrator did not mention them in his findings. he talks mostly about the views. in fact only about the views in this finding. no consideration is given as to whether the variance, the fence itself might be detrimental to the walkway even though these are the most immediate property in improvements in the vicinity. is it harmonious or harmful to the over all design and feel of the walkway. it's a flat board fence really appropriate here. we call your attention to the photograph on the first page of our brief and the photograph on the left page of our exhibits. there is no view. >> you said our brief. are you a participant in the brie