jersmy paul. i'm a permit consultant working in san francisco. around i'm in favor of anything that increases transparency and openness in thelic press. and this a.d.u. exception for a new unit going in makes perfect sense. there are many situations right now, buildings in the pipeline that have vacant spaces being built for recreational use or use with the other units that are intended for a.d.u., but an a.d.u. can't be put in until a building is completed and certificate of final completion and occupancy is issued. it doesn't a lot of sense as public policy to have a process that works that way. we should be transparent and say what our intents is as we start the process and discuss it with our neighbors and our community. thank you. >> thank you very much. any other members of the public who wish to comment on item one? ok. seeing none, public comment is closed. i'm going reserve most of my comments on this item because it will be continued and imagine there will be some changes made to the legislation. be but i would say overall the goal and